Geomorphology Flashcards
(135 cards)
Discuss the components of GW.
1) pore spaces of regolith and bed rocks, below the grnd surface
2) main source
3) aquifers: sands ideal; permeable sandstones
4) saturation of regoliths and rocks
5)saturated or phraeatic zone- GW table
6) unsaturated or vadose zone or aeration zone
7) aquiclude
8) confined water- artesian wells
9) perched water table
10) seasonal and annual fluctuations
Discuss the mechanism of geomorphic work of GW and the factors controlling the process.
1) erosion, limited transport and deposition
2) extremely slow
3) slumping, debris slides and fall and land slides
4) corrosion or solution; corrasion or abrasion;attrition and hydraulic action
5) RW mixed with atm and organic Co2 becomes active solvent agent
6) R.M. Garrels: seven variables that control limestone solution
7) amt of dissolution of carbonate rocks: T, Pco2, organic co2,carbonate rocks(limestone or dolomite, chalk), joints of rocks, nature and rate offlow of GW, contact time
What are Karst topography and where are they formed?
Landforms produced by chemical weathering or chemical erosion of carbonate rocks, mainly limestone and dolomites, by surface and subsurface are called KT
in areas where thick beds of massive limestones lie just below layer of superficial material
1) eastern margin of adriatic sea,in erstwhile yugoslavia
2) Causes region of southern france
3)Spanish andulasia
4) Northern Puerto Rico
5) Jamaica
6) Southern Indiana,Virginia, tennesse and central florida
7) other minor karst areas: Carlsbad area of USA, chalk area of England, chalk area of France, parts of Jura mts
8) India: non-existence of extensive thick limestone formations near the surface. Most of Vindhyan formations buried under thick covers of sandstones and shales. eg. Rohtas stage limestone are buried under 90 m thick cover of massive sandstones. few areas identified in Himalayas(J&K, SahasraDhara, Rovers cave), Panchmarhi,coastal area near Vishakhapatnam
What are the essential conditions favourable for development of karst topography?
1) massive, thickly bedded, hard and tenacious, well cemented and welljointed
2) Limestones should nt be porous
3) position should be above the GW table
4) should be widely distributed in both areal and vertical dimensions
5) rocks should be close to Grnd surface
6) should be highly faulted , folded or fractured
7) enough rf
various erosional and depositionl landforms of characterestic of Karst topography?
EROSIONAL LANDFORMS
1) Lapies: highly corrugated and rough surface of limestone lithology chracterized by low ridges and pinnacles, narrow clefts and numerous solution holes.
formed due to corrosion of limestones along their joints
2) Solution holes; sink holes (funnelshaped and cylindrical); compound sinks; swallow holes;ponores; dolines;collapsesinks; solutionpan (Lost river of Indiana); karst lakes; cockpits; karst window; uvalas and jamas; poljes(vertical side walls, flat alluvial floors, independent surface drainage system, irregular borders and central lake; Livno Polje of Balkan region of Europe)
(https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djm5IToehaodk-lFs?e=zCs12e)
3) valleys of Karst region: sinking creek; blind valley; karst valley
4) caves and caverns: voids of large dimensio below the grnd surface; most significant erosional landforms of GW; vary in size (carlsbad and Mammoth caves of USA)
5) natural bridge: due to collapse of roofs or due to disappearance of surface streams as subterranean streams and formation of valleys below the grnd
DEPOSITIONAL LANDFORMS
Speleothems; calcite common constituent; travertines; tufa/calctufa; dripstones; stalactites and stalagmites; helictites and heligmites and globulites; flowstones; drapes or curtains
Give an account of various theories of Limestone caves formation?
1) most debatable among all karst landforms
2) Corrasion theory: Lapprent and Martonne; due to abrasion by GW in the vadose zone, above watertable
3) Two cycle theory: W.M.Davis; in 1st cycle, caves are formed by phreatic water i.e. water under hydrostatic pressure below water table and then in 2nd cycle, are is uplifted and caves come under vadose zone coz of lowering of water table and the cave becomes dry and thus forms the depositional Lf (speleotherms).
4) Water Table theory of A.C. Swinnerton: caves are formed by lateral flow of water in vadose zone or at water table level
5) Static water zone theory of Gardener: caves are formed due to solution of ls above water table
6) Invasion theory of C.A.Malott:caves are formed by subterranean streams
Explain the realtionship betn cave ceiling and formation of stalactites?
1) Stalactites (St) are formde by deposition of calcareous solutes carried by water dripping through cave ceilings in dry env.
2) incicle or needle like
3) shapes controlled by shape of cave ceiling
4) when cave ceiling is fault or is uniformly arched: St are uniform and their tapering lower ends are directly pointed towards cave floor
5) when cave ceiling is steeply inclined, inclined and elongated St are formed
6) when cave ceiling is flat but gently inclined, slightly inclined and elongated St are formed
Karst CoE: intro?
1) J.W. Beede(3 stage) and Jovan Cvijic(4 stage)
2) DAvis: special phase of normal fluvial cycle characterised by surface drainage, its disappearance undergrnd and reappearance of subterranean as surface drainage
3)simpler: uniformity of str and dominance of mono-process (solution)
4) Base level not precisely known, mostly believed to be Water table of GW
5) conditions for initiation:(i) exposure of thick limestone at Gnd surface (ii) overlain by thin veneer of NSR
6) Two types of str preferred: (i) Folded and (ii) faulted
Karst CoE: Youth?
1) surface drainage in regions of …
2) if overlain by NSR…
3) rainwater mixed with atm Co2–along joints—sink holes and swallow holes through soln; increase in size and no.
4)grnd surface develops in rough terrain due to dev of lapies
5) with enlargement, dolines are formed and disappear of surface drainage through sinks and blind valleys
6) undergrnd drainage starts formation of caves and caverns through soln and abrasion
7) termination mkd by complete disappearance of surface drainage
Karst CoE: Mature?
1) total disappearance-> grnd surfae dry
2) numerous sinking creeks
3) process of undergrnd soln and abrasion increases due to increase in vol
4) Gradual enlargement of caves, galleries and passages
5) Covering roofs- thinning-> uvalas, poljes and karst windows–> residual uplands betn uvalas become ridges
6) Late maturity characterised by destruc of most of solutional landforms
Karst coE: old stage?
1) cave roofs totally collapsed and ridges betn uvalas narrowed down and reduced in height
2) residual carbonate rocks that project above grnd surafce , called hums
3) Most of grnd surface is levelled and thus resemble peneplain
4) subterranean drainage again appears on grnd surface and nearly all of karst valleys and sinking creeks are removed.
Continental Drift: intro?
The idea of dynamic nature of earth crust was a complete departure from the then prevailing view of permanency of continents and ocean basins. Although scholars had proposed the idea of continental drift even before wegner but he was the first to mould this idea into a theoretical frame work.
He propounded his concept on continental drift in the year 1912 but it could not come in light till 1922.
the continental drift theory of Wegener ‘grew out of the need of explaining the major variations of climate in the past’.Wegner being a climatologist was perplexed to find glacial deposits in the equatorial regions and evaporities in the sub polar regions. Such anomaly would only be explained eithen, rough shifting of climatic zones or continental shifting since climatic zones being governed primarily by the sun were least likely to shift, hence Wegner proposed the theoity of continental drift.
Thus, the main objective behind his ‘displacement hypothesis’ was to explain the global climatic changes which are reported to have taken place during the past earth history.
Continental Drift: basic axioms?
- Following Edward Suess, Wegener believed in three layers system of the earth e.g. outer layer of ‘sial’, intermediate layer of ‘sima’ and the lower layer of ‘nife’. Continents or sialic masses were floating on sima without any resistance. Oceanic crust represented the upper sima.
- During carboniferous period all the continents were united together in the form of one landmass, which he called ‘Pangaea’. Wenger does not describe conditions from pre-Carboniferous times.
- Pangaea was surrounded on all sides by an extensive water mass called ‘Panthalsa’.
- The northen part of ‘Pangaea’ Consisting of the present. America Europe and Asia was named Laurasia \Angaraland .The southern part of Range consisting of the present S America, Africa, Peninsular India, Australia and Antarctica was named “Gondwanaland”.
- South pole was located near present Durban at this time
- Pangea was disrupted during subsequent periods and broken landmasses drifted away from each other
Continental Drift: process of CD: headings?
- Forces responsible
- Process of Drifting of continents
- Creation of Oceans
- Mountain Building
- Origin of island arcs
Continental Drift: process of CD: Forces responsible?
- According to Wegener the continents after breaking away from the Panagaea moved (drifted) in two directions e.g. (i) equatorward movement and (ii) westward movement.
- The equatorward movement of sialic blocks (continental blocks) was caused by gravitational differential force and force of buoyancy.
- The westward movement of the continents was caused by the tidal force of the sun and the moon.
Continental Drift: process of CD: Process of Drifting of continents?
- The disruption, rifting and ultimately drifting of the continental blocks began in Carboniferous period.
- Pangaea was broken into two parts due to differential gravitational force and the force of buoyancy. The northern part became Lauratia (Angaraland) while the southern part was called by Wegener as Gondwanaland.
- The inter vening space between these two giant continental blocks was filled up with water and the resultant water body was called Tethys Sea. This phase of the disruption of Pangaea is called ‘Opening of Tethys’.
- Gondwanaland was disrupted during Cretaceous period and Indian peninsula, Madagascar, Australia and Antarctica broke away from Pangaea and drifted apart under the impact of tidal force of the sun and the moon. North America broke away from Angaraland and drifted westward due to tidal force. Similarly, South America broke away from Africa and moved westward under the impact of tidal force.
- The movement of the continental blocks away from the poles was dramatically called by Wegener as ‘the flight from the poles’.
Continental Drift: process of CD: Creation of oceans?
- Due to northward movement of Indian Peninsula Indian Ocean was formed while the Atlantic Ocean was formed due to westward movement of two Americas. It may be mentioned that North and South Americas were drifting westward at different rates and hence ‘S’ shape of the Atlantic Ocean could be possible.
- Arctic and North Sea were formed due to flight of the continental blocks from north pole.
- The size of the Panthalasa (primitive Pacific Ocean) was remarkably reduced because of the movement of continental blocks from all sides towards Panthalasa. Thus, the remaining portion of Panthalasa became the Pacific Ocean.
Continental Drift: process of CD: Mountain Building?
The frontal edges of westward drifting continental blocks of North and South Americas were crumpled and folded against the resistance of the rocks of the sea-floor (sima) and thus the western cordilleras of the two Americas (e.g. Rockies and Andes and other mountain chains associated with them) were formed.
Similarly, the Alpine ranges of Eurasia were folded due to equatorward movement of Eruasia and Africa to gether with Pennisular India (equator was passing thorough Tethys sea at that time).
Continental Drift: process of CD: Origin of island arcs?
Wegener has related the process of the origin of island arcs and festoons (of eastern Asia, West Indies and the arc of the southern Antilles between Tierra del Fugo and Antarctica) to the differential rates of continental drift.
When the Asiatic block (part of Angaraland) was moving westward, the eastern margin of this block could not keep pace with the westward mov ing major landmass, rather lagged behind, conse quently the island arcs and festoons consisting of Sakhalin, Kurile, Japan, Phillippines etc. were formed.
Similarly, some portions of North and South Americas, while they were moving westward, were left behind and the island arcs of West Indies and south ern Antilles were formed.
Continental Drift: Evidences in favour?
- Geographical similarity between the opposing coasts of the Atlantic ocean. The two sides of the Atlantic are such that they can be joined together i.e. eastern coast of South America can be fitted in to W.Coast of Africa, E.Coast of N. America can be fitted against W. Coast of Europe. This was called “Jigsawfit” of the opposing coasts of Atlantic ocean by Wegner.
- Geological Structure of the lands located on two coasts of Atlantic also exhibit remarkable similarity
(a)On both the coasts the structural and relief features are found transverse to the coasts.
(b) The Caledonian and Hercynian mountain system of both coasts of Atlantic are similar.
The best example provided by the Appalachian mountains of N. America which come right up to the coast and then continues their bend across the N. Atlantic ocean in the mountains of S.west Ireland, wales and central Europe.
Caledonian orogeny: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djnIfvuVcvb0NydKD?e=O8wz2o
Hercynian Orogeny: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djnOfsYxj7FAkNWbt?e=SzQA7s
So on both coasts, there is great Similarity in the structure and direction of Hercynian and Caledonian mts and their truncated end can be joined together.
The opposing coasts of S. Atlantic ocean in Africa and Brazil display even greater resemblance in their structure and rocks. The data relating to the Isotope ages of rocks in eastern south America and western regions of Africa has been plotted on maps and both the landmasses have been found to have rocks of the same ages and similar structure. This fact provides a strong proof of these two continents being joined together.
(c)The occurance of gold deposits in river alluvium in Ghana Coast (Africa) and absolute absence of source rocks in that regions. However across Atlantic ocean, the source rocks bearing gold are found in Belen sau in Brazil (S.America), This indicates that Africa and S. America existed together and the gold bearing sediments were transported down the slope from Brazil and deposited in Ghana.
- Paleoclimatic evidences :
The distribution of the carboniferous glacial deposit in Brazil, Falkland, S. Africa, Peninsular India, Australia and Antarctica Presents a powerful Proof of the fact that during permocarboniferous glaciations these land masses were assembled together. - Fossil evidences: - The fossil remains of Glossopteris fern and Mesozoje reptiles are found on all the pieces of Gondwanaland this indicates the unity of these pieces. In fact development of distinctive fauna in different parts of the world have been found after the Mesozoic era but before the Mesozoic era there is great similarity in fauna throughout the world. This is an important evidence in support of continental drift.
(https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djnQSYYFi6jyMDbRz?e=yindne) - Palaeomagnetism has provided the most reliable proof of continental drift and palaeomagnetic evidences indicate the existence of “Pangea” in some form at the end of the Paleozoic era. In fact the Paleomagnetic studies have not only confirmed continental drift but have also provided the evidence of sea floor spreading.
- It has been reported from geodetic evidences that Greenland is drifting westward at the rate of 20 cm per year. The evidences of sea floor spreading after 1960 have confirmed the movement of landmasses with respect to each other.
- The lemmings (small sized animals) of the northern part of Scandinavia have a tendency to run westward when their population is enormously increased but they are foundered in the sea water due to absence of any land beyond Norwagian coast.This behaviour suggests that landmasses were united in the ancient times and the animals used to migrate to far off places in the western direction.
Continental Drift: Criticism?
- The greatest criticism was levelled against the forces which, according to wegner, were responsible for causing the drift. The westward movement of the continents was ascribed to the tidal force of the moon and sun, but this movement is possible only if this force is ten thousand million times more than at present and if the tidal force would have been of this magnitude then it would have stopped the rotation of the earth within one year
The equator ward drift was attributed to the gravitational force exerted by the earth equatorial bulge, but this force is many million times feeble to drag the continents. - The mountain orogeny as explained by wegner invited strong criticism because he described the forceful resistance offered by Sima in the free movement of sialic continents in order to explain the origin of mountains, which is contrary to his basic premise, that sial floated on sima which offered no resistance.
- The jigsawit of the opposing coasts of the Atlantic ocean was found to be not so complete.
- Wegener has not elaborated the direction and chronological sequence of the displacement of the continents. He did not describe the situations of pre-Carboniferus times. Other questions like What kept Pangaea together till its disruption in Mesozoic era?’ Why did the process of continental drift not start before Mesozoic era? were not pondered over
Continental Drift: Conclusion?
Although in the absence of plausible driving mechanism his continental drift theory, invited criticism from diverse quarters and until about mid 20th century his theory remained,ghly controversial but after 1950’s his theory began to gain wide acceptance on account of the irrefutable evidences provided by palaeomagnetic studies as well as new theories of seafloor spreading and plate tectonics.
In fact the paleomagnetic and geological evidences have now enabled to reconstruct the history of continental drift back to Precambrian period.
This shows recurring episodes of continental rupture, drift and collision since earlier times each cycle lasting for a few hundred million years and has been called wilson cycle, named after J.T. wilson, one of the Pioneer of P.T.T.
Continental Drift: Diagrams?
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djnWHUW4nTnkGvw-6?e=BnHNEK
Plate Tectonics: intro?
Plate tectonics is a scientific theory that explains how major landforms are created as a result of Earth’s subterranean movements. The theory, which solidified in the 1960s, transformed the earth sciences by explaining many phenomena, including mountain building events, volcanoes, and earthquakes.
the theory of plate tectonics is not related to any individual scientist, rather a host of scientists of various scientific disciplines and research groups and expeditions have contributed in the development of this valuable concept of the second half of the 20th century. eg Mckenzie and Parker’s Paving stone hypothesis; in 1965, J.T Wilson become first to suggest that the earth’s lithosphere is made up of individual plates and identified relative motion of plates and by 1968 the concept of Continental drift and sea-floor spreading were united to create an all encompassing theory known as plate tectonic.
Diag: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AvN_8sA-Zf0djWDHYQK_lglKdl3d?e=JNC4O0