Major Geomorphic Theories Flashcards
(92 cards)
G.K. Gilbert: intro?
1) no definite theory of landform dev
2) based on investigations of lf in different parts of USA like Great Basin, Artesian wells of Great plains, alaska
On the basis of his investigation of landforms and the processes associated with their formation in different parts of the United States, Grove Karl Gilbert formulated a set of principles to explain geomorphic features. The concepts and principles propounded by Gilbert provided the base for the development of the dynamic equilibrium theory involving time- independent development of landforms and it subsequently became the pivot of drastic methodological shift in geomorphology.
G.K.Gilbert: main objective?
to understand balance equilibrium and investigate present landform to predict future ones rather than to reconstruct the past i.e. to identify and quantify processes and their dynamic competition
G.K.Gilbert: Theory?
Landscapes remain in equilibrium condition, their history is rhythmic punctuated by oscillatory changes and their forms are punctuated by frictional rhythms arising out of the mechanism of driving and resisting forces.”
G.K.Gilbert: reference system?
the landscape is the result of two competing tendencies i.e. tendency towards variability (when driving force exceeds resisting force) and tendency towards uniformity (when driving force equals resisting force)
G.K. Gilbert: Mechanism?
1) postulated a set ofprinciples:
-> Law of uniform slope
-> law of str
-> law of divide
-> law of tendency to equality
-> dynamic equilibrium
-> law of interdependence of parts
2) Three major components of his geomorphic principles were : concept of quantification; concept of rhythmic time; concept of equilibrium
G.K.Gilbert: Concept of Quantification?
Gilbert used scientific methods for interpretation of geomorphic processes and landforms resulting therefrom wherein he gave more emphasis to ‘quantity’ in place of ‘quality’ and applied the laws of thermodynamics to the analysis of geological processes.
-> First law of Thermodynamics: The driving force in process of gradation of river profile is the kinetic energy that is converted from potential energy of relief of the landscape
-> Second law of thermodynamics: wih passage of time a system tends to achieve minimum energy and maximum entropy. This explained the attainment of graded profile by various landscapes
G.K. Gilbert: Concept of time?
1)His concept of nature was based on two basic concepts one of which was concept of rhythmic time- different from contemporary concept of time
2) Motion of earth(rot+rev) is the basic rhythm- affects climate-in turn affects processes and landforms. Thus time has no direct role as imagined by davis
3) rejected evolutionary concept of ‘continuous, progreesive change’ through timeand advocated time indep model involving dynamic equilib and steady state
Gilbert’s concept of equilibrium?
- final form of any func system: net force zero i.e. Principle of Least force
2) Two forces in play: driving(tendency towards variability) and resisting(tendency towards uniformity)
3) gave ex of formation of loccoliths frm vulcanicity: The driving force of rising magma from beneath and the resisting force of superincumbent load. Further applied the principle of least force to explain profile of Equilibrium of a river
Gilbert’s explanation of river profile and grade?
1) applied the concept of least force to explain river’s profile of equilibrium
2) driving force : flow velocity
resistance : bed-load and lithology
So long as the system energy say driving force (flow velocity) equals the resisting force say frictional force, the state of equilibrium is established and this condition prevails till the equilib rium condition is maintained and thus the principle of least force works.
3)The long profile of a river which has attained the equilibrium state is called profile of equilibrium (i.e. equilibrium of actions) and such river (in the state of equilibrium) is called graded river.
4) Gilbert applied the concept of ‘grade’ to all of the landforms and processes which he studied in the field e.g. ‘graded beach’ in the case of Bonneville Lake, ‘graded hillslope’ in the case of Sierra mountain etc.
G.K. Gilbert: evaluation?
- ahead of his time: advanced concepts like ‘steady states’, ‘graded curve and profileof equilibrium’, ‘dynamic equilib’
- became base of ruling theory of landform development (e.g. dynamic equilibrium theory involving time- independent development of landforms)
- Became pivot of drastic methodological shift in the postworld war II
J.T. Hack: Main points?
1) intro
J.T. Hack: intro?
J.T. Hack Rejected the evolutionary concept of landform development, represented by notion of cycle of erosion of Davis. He advocated the dynamic equilibrium theory of landscape development.
J.T.Hack: objective?
To explain the landscape of any region on the basis of present denudational processes operating there in and to demonstrate lithological adjustment to landforms
J.T.Hack: Theories propounded?
1) Dynamic equilibrium Theory: most of landscapes are in a dynamic equilibrium betn available energy for work and the work being done i.e. Geomorphic system is an open system and so long as energy remains constant in the geomorphic system, landscapes remain in conditions of steady statethough there is lowering of landscapes by denudational processes
2) Concept of Lithological adjustment to Lf: Topographic forms and processes vary with differences in nature of rocks and processes acting on them.. eg. in folded Applachians, local relief and slope angles hv been so adjusted that each major geological rock surface has an equal sediment load per unit area
3) Continuous downwasting model: envisages dynamic equilib betn uplift and downwasting but not necessarily in steady state.
Hack’s views on Time?
1) Hack’s model envisages time independent or timeless dev of landscapes
2) Didn’t agree with evolutionary model but conceded that evolution is a fact of nature and that the inheritance of form is always a possibility
Hack’s open system concept vs Davis’ evolutionary concept: differences?
1) Hack’s Geomorphic model came up to fill the vaccum created by rejection of davisian and Penckian model
2) Acc to Hack, polycyclic relief can’t be explained otbo multiple erosion cycles(Davis) but otbo dynamic equilib
3) Hack proposed a time indep model vs Davis’ evolutionary model
4) Hack’s lf are adapted to changing env conditions while Davis’ lf are derivatives of past env conditions.
5) Hack predicts no changes in upstream because of change in sea level.
Hack’s open system concept vs Davis’ evolutionary concept: similarities?
1)Hack did opine that evolution is a fact of nature and that inheritance of form is always a possibility
2) Palmquist opines that’Hack paraphrases Davis’ ideal geographical cycle in terms of equilib concept and develops a similar evolutionary scheme’ eg. if base level of erosion remains constant then Hack’s lf undergoes similar progressive changes as does Davis’ lf
Evaluation of Hack’s model?
1)Hack’s Idea became less relevant where geomorphic scale increases
2) ‘landscapes in a dynamic equilib’ can’t be validated coz of if there is gradual lowering then energy for doing the denudational work also decreases, and so balance cannot remain
3) ‘landscapes change acc to changing env’ doubtful coz there are very little landscape that instantaneously adapt to new env conditions.
Geomorphic Theory of Davis: intro?
First Geomorphologist to present a general theory of landform evolution
His theory is an outcome of a set of models and theories of his like complete cycle of river life (cyclic concept of progressive development of erosional stream valleys), geographical cycle (sequential development of landforms through time), slope evolution etc.
Geomorphic Theory of Davis: Goal?
To provide the basis of systematic description and genetic classification of landscapes
Geomorphic Theory of Davis: theory?
Landforms go through changes in a sequential manner, passing through- youth, mature and old stage- and these changes are directed towards a well defined objective- development of peneplain
Geomorphic Theory of Davis: reference system?
Landforms change in an orderly manner as processes operate through time such that under uniform external environmental conditions, an orderly sequence of landform develops
Geomorphic Theory of Davis: Defn of Geographic cycle?
Period of time during which an uplifted landmass undergoes its transformation by the process of landsculpture, ending into low featureless plain or peneplain
Geomorphic Theory of Davis: Trio of Davis?
Structure: LIthological (rock types) and structural characteristics (folding, faulting, joints of rocks)
time: not only used in temporal context but also used as a process itself, leading to an irreversible progress of change of landforms
Process: Agents of denudation (running water in case of geographical cycle)