Gerlad Croft Flashcards
(9 cards)
- “You seem to be a nice well-behaved family—”
What: Compliments the Birlings at dinner before the Inspector arrives
• How: Dramatic irony = masks the dysfunction about to be revealed
Adjective “well-behaved” = naive judgement
Dash = hesitation, awkward politeness
• Why:
- Priestley mocks upper-class illusions of respectability
- Builds theme of appearances vs truth
- “I don’t come into this suicide business.”
What: Denies any involvement with Eva’s death
• How: Noun “business” = detached, corporate tone
Short declarative = defensive, self-protective
Tone = dismissive
• Why:
- Priestley shows how the privileged distance themselves from guilt
- Highlights resistance to accountability
- “All right. I knew her. Let’s leave it at that.”
• What: Admits connection to Eva but wants to stop discussion
• How: Imperative “let’s leave it” = control
Clipped syntax = tension, reluctance
Tone = evasive
• Why:
- Priestley exposes how powerful men conceal shameful truths
- Suggests concern for image over morality
- “She was young and pretty and warm-hearted – and intensely grateful.”
• What: Describes Eva emotionally during their affair
• How: Romantic triplet = idealised view of her
Superlative “intensely” = overemphasises her dependency
Tone = nostalgic, possessive
• Why:
- Priestley critiques how men romanticise imbalanced relationships
- Challenges audience to question true motives behind ‘kindness’
- “I became at once the most important person in her life.”
What: Claims he was central to Eva’s happiness
• How: Superlative “most important” = inflated ego
First-person dominance = control
Tone = proud, self-centred
• Why:
- Priestley exposes emotional manipulation masked as care
- Reveals imbalance of power in their relationship
- “I didn’t ask for anything in return.”
What: Justifies the relationship as generous
• How: Defensive tone = self-preservation
Verb “ask” = implies favour, not equality
Short, clipped sentence = quick deflection
• Why:
- Priestley questions the sincerity of ‘charity’ in power imbalances
- Undermines the idea of selfless exploitation
- “That man wasn’t a police officer.”
What: Reveals Inspector Goole wasn’t real
• How: Declarative tone = feels triumphant
Noun “man” strips authority from “Inspector”
Dismissive phrasing = erases moral weight
• Why:
- Priestley shows obsession with surface truth over moral truth
- Warns audience not to focus only on legality
- “What girl? There were probably four or five different girls.”
• What: Tries to suggest Eva wasn’t a single real person
• How: Rhetorical question = deflection of guilt
Vague plural “four or five” = deliberate confusion
Tone = cynical, dismissive
• Why:
- Priestley critiques how facts are used to erase moral accountability
- Audience sees Gerald as evading responsibility
- “Everything’s all right now, Sheila. What about this ring?”
What: Tries to resume engagement after crisis appears to be over
• How: Symbolism of “ring” = return to old order
Present tense “is” = ignores growth
Interrogative = pressuring Sheila
• Why:
- Priestley shows failure to learn or grow
- Highlights danger of reverting to comfort after temporary guilt