The Inspector Flashcards
(9 cards)
- “It’s better to ask for the Earth than to take it.”
What: Defends Eva’s request for fair pay; criticises capitalist greed
How: Antithesis “ask” vs “take” = moral contrast between justice + exploitation
Metaphor “take the Earth” = greed of the upper class
Balanced syntax = persuasive authority
Why:
- Priestley exposes selfishness of capitalism
- Encourages audience to empathise with the working class
- “A chain of events.”
What: Describes how multiple actions led to Eva’s death
How: Metaphor “chain” = cause + effect; binds the family in guilt
Short, blunt phrasing = factual, emotionless truth
Imagery of entrapment = inevitability
Why:
- Priestley highlights shared responsibility
- Warns audience that small actions have wide consequences
- “If you’re easy with me, I’m easy with you.”
What: The Inspector warns the family about their cooperation
How: Repetition of “easy” = calm authority, but underlying threat
Conditional structure = controlled power dynamic
Colloquial tone = manipulative familiarity
Why:
- Priestley shows the Inspector’s power over the powerful
- Audience sees him as morally in control
- “Public men, Mr Birling, have responsibilities as well as privileges.”
What: Confronts Birling’s denial of duty
How: Juxtaposition “responsibilities” vs “privileges” = moral imbalance
Formal tone + title use = distance and correction
Emphasis on “as well as” = moral expectation
Why:
- Priestley attacks corrupt authority figures
- Urges audience to demand moral leaders
- “We have to share something. If there’s nothing else, we’ll have to share our guilt.”
What: Appeals to collective moral responsibility
How: Anaphora “share” = unity
Conditional clause = warning
Abstract noun “guilt” = moral burden
Why:
- Priestley promotes socialism + emotional empathy
- Encourages audience to take ownership of injustice
- “She came to you for help, at a time when no woman could have needed it more.”
What: Condemns Mrs Birling’s rejection of Eva
How: Emotive phrasing = intensifies Eva’s vulnerability
Hyperbole “no woman…more” = maximum moral failure
Direct address = personal accusation
Why:
- Priestley emphasises injustice and cruelty in upper-class hypocrisy
- Shocks audience into empathy
- “Each of you helped to kill her.”
What: Final moral judgement on the family
How: Second-person direct address = forces personal guilt
Declarative sentence = no argument or escape
Verb “killed” = removes distance from consequences
Why:
- Priestley exposes collective guilt
- Audience made to feel complicit too
- “We are members of one body.”
What: Delivers Priestley’s core socialist message
How: Metaphor = shared humanity
Biblical allusion = moral and spiritual resonance
Collective pronoun “we” = universal unity
Why:
- Priestley promotes interconnectedness
- Audience encouraged to embrace compassion
- “If men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.”
What: Final warning; foreshadows war + destruction
How: Tricolon of violent imagery = apocalyptic tone
Prophetic voice = biblical weight + fear
Modal “will not” = stubborn human failure
Why:
- Priestley warns against repeating history
- Urges audience to act before it’s too late