Gezi Park

Question 1

What is the Gezi Park case?

Answer 1

It was a 2013 protest movement in Turkey triggered by plans to redevelop a park. It escalated into a national crisis after the government ignored scientific, stakeholder, practitioner, and organizational evidence.

Question 2

Why is the Gezi Park case relevant to EBMgt?

Answer 2

It is a clear case of failed evidence-based decision-making.

Question 3

How does the Gezi Park case relate to scientific evidence?

Answer 3

Scientific evidence from urban planners and environmental experts showed that redeveloping green space would harm public health and urban sustainability. This evidence was ignored.

Question 4

How does the Gezi Park case relate to organizational evidence?

Answer 4

Internal reports and local government knowledge indicated the plan was unpopular and risky. These insights were not used in decision-making.

Question 5

How does the Gezi Park case relate to stakeholder evidence?

Answer 5

Citizens, activists, and community groups protested the redevelopment. Their concerns were ignored, and peaceful protests were met with force.

Question 6

How does the Gezi Park case relate to practitioner evidence?

Answer 6

Urban planners and civil society leaders had practical experience and warned of negative outcomes. Their input was overridden by central political leadership.

Question 7

What lesson does the Gezi Park case offer for EBMgt?

Answer 7

When all four types of evidence are ignored, it leads to ethical failure, stakeholder backlash, and reputational damage. It highlights the importance of inclusive, evidence-based decision-making.

Question 8

Citing

Answer 8

2023