Groups Flashcards

1
Q

group

A

a collection of individuals that have relations to one another that make them interdependent to some degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Groups vary in degree of

A

1)group entitativity
2)hierarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

group entitativity

A

mutual interdependence and cohesion
ie:coworkers in a unit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

hierarchy:

A

arrangement of individuals in the group in terms of relative power(larger the group-> the more they tend to be hierarchical)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why live in groups?

A

Protections from predation human violence

Collective hunting of big game(hunting of big animals)

Cultural learning, the collective brain needs groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Participants were in fMRI being scanned while playing a video game(cyberball)

A

1st condition:inclusion phase(ball is being shared and passed around)
2nd conditions: exclusion phase(ball is only being passed between 2 other teammates)

When participants were excluded, greater activation of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC)

Does-dependent: the more participants felt excluded, the more activation in dACC(same brain area that respond to physical pain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Social facilitation:

A

The effect of the presence of others on performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Social facilitation:

A

presence of others enhances dominant (well-practiced) response, but inhibits less-dominant (not well practiced) response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Zajonc’s theory:

A

groups can increase/decreases performance based on certain things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social loafing:

A

decreased effort put forth by individuals when working in a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

diffusion of responsibility

A

Ingham (1974) tug of war study: blindfolded participants pulled 18% harder when they thought they were alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Wisdom of the crowd

A

Average judgment converges on the correct solution
1)the crowd has a diversity of opinions
2)individual opinions are independent of one another
3)the crowd should be able to aggregate individual opinions into one collective decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Herd mentality

A

is detrimental to wise decisions and creativity and often lead to disastrous group decisions

-Aggregated information yields better and more creative solutions

-diverse views in a group weaken the confirmation bias and combine the best features of different ideas

-Diverse groups of non-experts beat even expert opinions

-As long as the individual’s judgements are independent of one another or even neg related, homogenous groups are not wise groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Groupthink

A

-opposite of wide crowd

social pressures to reach consensus in an highly cohesive group which leads to suboptimal decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conditions that foster groupthink

A

Stressful situation

Like minded members of group

Isolation from outside info and influence

Lack of clear procedures

Strong, authoritarian group leader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Symptoms of group think

A

Illusion of invulnerability

Dissent is discouraged, “mindguards”

Self-censorship, illusion of unanimity

One-sided debate(collective rationalization)

Unwillingness to consider alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Strategies to reduce groupthink

A

Encourage criticism and diverse viewpoints

Input from outside sources

Generate different ideas, approaches before decisions is made

Watch out for illusion of invulnerability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Bias and discrimination has been steadily declining

A

Implicit attitudes for (sexuality, race,skin tone) decline

Implicit attitude for age and disability hasn’t changed that much, body weight seems to increase

Least change: Age attitudes 22% decline(explicit attitude)

Most change: race attitudes 98% decline(explicit attitude)

Decline in attitude change in conservatives and liberals for sexuality, race, but not much for age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The ABC of intergroup Relations

A

Prejudice (affect):
Discrimination(behavior):
Stereotypes(cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Prejudice (affect):

A

a negative attitude or affective response towards a certain group and its individual members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Discrimination(behavior):

A

negative behavior towards members of a particular group based on their membership in that group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Stereotypes(cognition)

A

beliefs about attributes that are thought to be characteristic of members of particular groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Distal explanations: Evolutionary explanations of ingroupishness

A

1)parochial altruism
2)pathogen avoidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Evolutionary account #1: parochial altruism

A

Endemic intergroup warfare in ancestral environments

Intergroup psychology evolved to be in-groupish-small, cohesive, cooperative but mutually hostile bands

Innate dual tendency for 1)altruism towards ingroup AND 2)hostility towards outgroup- we are a clique-sh species
“Us vs them thinking” or coalitional psychology

But what counts as ingroup vs outgroup is flexible, socially constructed

Explains why the content of prejudice can be different across time and place, but us vs them mentality tends to be more resilient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Evolutionary account #2: pathogen avoidance
In ancestral environments, strangers were potential sources of novel pathogens for which immune defense is unprepared Studies show that 1)areas with high pathogen prevalence -> more ingroupish(more awareness of strangers) 2)more fear of pathogens -> more prejudice and stronger immune reaction Participants exposed to germs slide show had higher funding for familiar countries and less for foreign countries
26
Cultural explanations of ingroup-outgroup favoritism
Cultural dissimilarity-dislike Conversely similarity and familiarity= liking People felt the most positive towards groups that: 1) were geographically nearer 2)culturally most similar to themselves
27
Multiculturalism vs Culture-blindness
Belief in the value of multiculturalism is associated with less ethnocentrism (Ryan et al, 2007) Adoption of multicultural outlook improves intergroup relations and improves experiences of disadvantage groups (Vorauer, Gagnon, and Sasaki, 2009)
28
Proximal Explanations(suggest interventions to reduce prejudice)
Socioeconomic explanations: Realistic Group Conflict theory Motivational perspective (back to rationalization) Cognitive perspective
29
Socioeconomic explanations: Realistic Group Conflict theory
Group conflict, prejudice and discrimination are likely to arise over competition between groups for limited desired resources Groups who perceive themselves to be at most risk of another group’s advance are more prejudiced(eg.: working class people resenting immigrants who might compete for the same jobs) High unemployment and economic recession=more anti-immigrant attitudes
30
The Robbers Cave experiment(Sherif) (realistic group conlfict theory)
Summer camp in oklahoma Introduced competition and intergroup conflict Reducing intergroup conflict through superordinate goals
31
Superordinate goals
:goals that transcend the interested of one individual group, and that can be achieved more readily by 2 or more groups working together
32
Earthquake diplomacy”(superordinate goals)
Turkey and Greece never had good relations, but earthquake in both areas led to diplomacy between the two
33
The Jigsaw Classroom (superorindate goals)
Students separated into diverse six-person learning groups Lesson divided into 6 parts Each part is required to complete the whole lesson Each student learns one piece then teaches the group They need each other to do well on test Prejudice goes down
34
Minimal Group experiments (Tajfel and turner)(you can create ingroup bias without conflict)
participants are assigned to groups on meaningless criteria Do u like Klee or Kandinsky painting more -Divided into Klee or Kandinsky group based on choice -Then they are given money/incentive to be able to give to anyone(ie in you ingroup or other group) People are more biased to people in their group Can not be explained by realistic conflict theory
35
Motivational perspective (back to rationalization)
Threats to the self: prejudice and discrimination can arise from various threats to the self: lack of control,randomness, reminders of mortality, loss of self-esteem System justification:prejudice and discrimination can arise when people are motivated to justify the broad socio political system of which they are part, rationalizing injustice and inequality experienced by groups; blaming disadvantaged groups
36
Cognitive perspective
Implicit and explicit stereotypes and prejudice
37
implicit attitudes:
thoughts that are outside of conscious awareness
38
Primed stereotypes(implicit)
procedure used to increase the accessibility of a concept or scheme
39
Implicit association test (IAT)(implicit)
measures unconscious stereotypes and prejudices toward particular groups
40
Implicit and explicit stereotypes and prejudice
Implicit and explicit attitudes are uncorrelated Implicit attitudes matter for discrimination especially when cognitive resources are taxed, fatigued, time pressure, or when motivation appears to be unbiased Explicit attitudes matter for discrimination when conscious reflection is possible/desirable
41
The contact hypothesis in Iraq
Participants were christian minorities in iraq that were persecuted Randomly assigned them to play soccer in a mixed group of christian and muslims or just christians If participants trained with muslim players, they were more likely to view muslims more favorable (vote muslim for an award, and more likely to sign up for mixed team again, and visit mosuls, attend mixed events, and donate mixed NGO)
42
Evidence based intervention strategies to reduce prejudice and conflict
Superordinate goals Superordinate identity Unlearning implicit associations Perceived similarity between groups multiculturalism(diversity) as a cultural value Contact: positive,equal-status contact involving one-on-one interactions.
43
Benefits of Diverse groups
More creativity, better decisions Cultural role models take down stereotypes and facilitate positive social change Rectify past imbalances and injustices Powerful antidote against prejudice(positive contact)
44
ingredients for postiive contact
Ingredients: Equal-status Positive atmosphere Superordinate goals and identity Community support (supportive cultural norms)
45
Challenges of diverse groups
Social interactions are less smooth There is lower levels of trust and more concerns about disrespect Greater perceived interpersonal conflict Less social cohesion
46
More diverse countries are not more prone to internal conflict, unless social fractionalization(how diverse a country is) is territorial
47
Three cultural models of interpersonal relationships
dignity culture face cultures honor culture
48
The culture of honor
A culture defined by its member’s strong concerns about their own and other’s reputations, leading to sensitivity to insults and a willingness to use violence to avenge any perceived wrong
49
southerner vs northerners
Investigators present several lines of evidence indicating that when their honor is slighted, southerners are more likely than northerners to respond with aggression White males from the south show more facial expressions of anger, elevated testosterone, firmer grip, and greater hostility after an insult that white males from north There are higher rates of homicide in southern states due to arguments than in the north
50
White male homicide offender rates:
Rates of felony-related murders are similar in non south and south/south-west regions of the US but argument related murderers are much more common in US south and Southwest than in other regions of the US
51
Cultural meaning
same situation may have diff cultural meanings,eliciting diff emotions
52
cultural meaning expeiremnt among southern and northern
Southern and northern participants walking down the hall were insulted(called an asshole) They measure testosterone levels after the insult, southern participants had increase of T levels
53
Inclusive fitness
According to evolutionary biology, the fitness of an individual based on reproductive success and the passing on of genes to future generations
54
Violence in stepfamilies
Natural selection rewards those parents who devote resources to their own offspring
55
Violence in stepfamilies:mistreated stepchildren
Studies found that children in canada were 70 times more likely to be killed by a step parents than by biological parents and children in america 100 times more likely
56
Gender difference in types of aggression
Large gender difference in violent crime rates Men much more likely to be involved in violent and criminal behavior Long history of violence against women Men also more likely to be victims of violence Possibly due to combo of difference in hormone levels, cultural learning, and evolved psychology **Men may be more physically aggressive, but women are more emotionally aggressive
57
Communication and reconciliation
Often in heat of conflict or aftermath of aggression, the adversaries tend to stop communication, to separate themselves from one another This tendency to avoid adversaries flies in the face of one of the most potent tools for reducing conflict:face-to-face communication As adversaries communicate, they often show a powerful tendency to reconcile, to made amends for hurtful words and harmful acts
58
Moving toward a less violent world
The world has become substantially more interconnected:our interests are more intertwined with those of people from other communities and nations Cultural norms are changing in favor of more peaceful relations We are enjoying one of the least violent most cooperative periods in human history There are fewer wars, and fewer casualties of war Murder rate have fallen drastically in most western countries as well as E. Asian countries
59
dignity cultures
inherit self-worth authenticity is virtue individualistic cultures,US less hierarchical, strong rule of law
60
face cultures
socially conferred self-worth determined by performing social obligations modesty and harmony are a virtue Confucian cultures, east asia stable social hierarchies
61
honor cultures
socially conferred self worth by social image of toughness defense of ones reputation Mediterranean, latin, tribal unstable social hierarchy