Hobbes Flashcards

(60 cards)

1
Q

hobbes frontispiece

A

o Depicted a colossal king ruling over mountains villages and cities
o Made up of multitude of indivdi
o Reflected personation artificial person authroised by mulltude
o Facing towards head look to state person //which one
o Whilst original looked more artificial, faces looking out , mask being worn
o Holding sword temporal power, crosier (bishop hook- spiritual power- church and state together
o Latin motto- job 41:24 ‘there is no power on earth to be compared to him’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

methodllogy

A
  • Ransitional thinker renaissance humanism to enlightenment sci
  • Not purley sci method
    rhetoric
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

not purely sci method 1

A

o Write age sci rev
o Live and write paris w decsartes
o Galileo met 1629
o Political phil shold be pursued with the same rigour and clarity as geometry
 Based on propositions deduction and predictable human behavour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

not purely sci method 2

A

o Each o fthem in relation to his key natural right of self preservation signif feature eo fhis work- tye set of political laws to supposedly sci notion tht humans definitively hold a self centered trait by natur
o Personation rmeinas central hobbes natural law- only trhoug process personation such laws enforced under control authroitivae soverign actor
o De cive- 1642 first ppolitcial sci text, rational sci approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

rhetoric

A

o Humanist
o More effective communication tool
o But unstable and sistrusted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

rhetoric unstanbel and mistrusted

A

 Tool manipulation esp demagogues and clerg y
 Translated thucydided feared political instability caused by pursuasive but reckless speakers, chaos fromdemocracy
 Language a source of discord unless strictly controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

leviathan themes

A

human nature
state of nature
personation
social contract
liberty
constitutional form
who writing for- steering middle course

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

human nature

A

self preservation
self centrerd
equal
bad
law of nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

self preservation

A

 ‘small families’ once collab mutual protection so ‘now do cities and kingdomes’
 Larger political assc expand and form alliances- unde rpretect of ‘weaken[ing[ their neighbours’
* Perhaps in hope that ‘remebered for it with honour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

self centered

A

 ‘restlesse desire of power after power’ a motivation which ‘ceaseth only in death’ hoping to attain ‘more intensive delight’
 Crave diginity honour and esteem- Fukuyama- thumos cravig dignity , megalothymia desire recognised as superior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

equal human nagture

A

 Made ‘equall in the faculties of body and mind’- greater comp
 Hence willing to ‘kill subsude supplant or repell the other
 Comp over ‘praise’
 ‘if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

bad human nature

A

 The wicked were fewer than the righteous
 ‘when men go to sleep he locks his dores’- violent life
 Native americans- ‘have no government at all, and live at this day in that brutish manner’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

law of nature

A

 To sek peace and follow it
 Second- relinquish natural righst to concede to soveriegn power
 Keeping promises
 Gratitude
 Allow personation to occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

state of nature why

A

o Warning that if not respect social contract retrn
o Thought experiemnet
o Understand how humans interacted naturally without artificial authroity
o Chaos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

state of nature

A

chaos
econ
nasty brutish and short
against aristotle political animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

chaos state of nature

A

 Without ‘a common power to keep them all in awe’ soc collapses into war ‘of every man, against every man’
* ‘condition of warr’echaos econ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

state of nature- against aritsotle politcila animals

A

 De cive v.5 socila animals bees or ants ‘shoul dnot be clale dpolitical, of rtheir gov is only an accord’
 Politics requires precisely the reunication of oes own desires and projects in the interess of a united course of action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

state of nature econ

A
  • ‘no place of industry’
  • ‘no culture of the earth’
  • ‘no navigation
  • ‘solitary poore
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

personation

A

representation
artificial
united
involuntary
abstract with religion
tool- organisation of gov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

personation- artificial

A

 Functions like a machine- life is the motion of its parts working together under soveriegn authority
 Dies when that unity dissolves or soveirgen power fails
 Linked to automota at time, artificial mechanisms- watches
 Inverse of artistotle- human nature political naturally in political communities, instead man mafe
- frontispiece

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

personation frontispeice

A

origional 165 1by abrham bosse
texture and tone of face smooth and opaque whilstrest is of small tiny human figures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

united personation

A

 ‘united in one person
 The multude of men are made one person
 The unity of the representer’ over the ‘unity of the represented’ is what makes the ‘person one’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

involuntay personation

A

 without reason- like ‘children, fooles and mad-men’ that have no rational thinking capabilities of their own, and so may be ‘personated by Guardians’
 paternalism, need hep making decisions aided doing so
 echo aristotleian belief children immature rationality needed personation help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

abstract with religion personation

A

 god could be personated
 was first by moses, then by son of man, holy ghost
 physicality eeded for this ‘person’ rep god on earth
 monarchs imbue gods divine power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
personation tool organisation fo gov
organisation of gov  ch23  minsters hold ‘authority’ over idff asepcts of sate  publique ministers’ lok after econ of commonwealth, concern ‘treaure’ ‘tributes’ ‘impositions’  do not divide oneness of soeveign-
26
personation not divide oness of soveriegn
* serve person rep’ * ‘can do nothing against his command, nor without his authority * Serve soevriegn in ‘political capcity’
27
social contract
should do willing/desperate conquest
28
should do social conrtact
 ‘maketh a covenant with the actor’  Rights transferred to representer
29
social conrtact wiling/desperate
 Covenant not to defend my selfe from force, by force is alws void  From ‘fear of eath and ouwnds’ ‘fear of invasion’ ‘fear of one anotehr’  Commonwealths only exist as long as there are ‘internal diseases’ within society  The state could not e founded on benevelone alone * Not surrender irghts just to e nice
30
social cnotract consent
 ‘conquest, is not the victory istlf’ rather ‘acquisition by victory, of a right, over the persons of men’ * In order to be deemed effectively in control of group of people, need to be part of a covenant * Contradict rest of book, reiew and conclusion
31
when can consent with conquest
 Only ‘consent to a conquere when previous obligation was at an end’ * Failed to protect from foriagn or each other * If ‘cannot performe the office they have put him into ‘ * ‘defend thenm’ ‘from foreign enemies’ and from ‘the inuries of one anotehr’ * Then ‘there is no longer a common-wealth
32
liberty
meaning surrendered although maintain some rule of law morality too much
33
liberty meaning
 Freedom ‘each man hath to use his own power’ ‘for the preservation of his own nature’ mared by the ‘absence of external impediments’  Preserve right protect themselves  Free man- one hwo can do things ‘by his strength and wit’ without hindrance  Freedom of speech ‘not the liberty of voice or proununciation ‘ * Instead one to whom ‘ no law hath obliged o speak otherwise than he did ‘
34
liberty freedom of movement quote
 'fear and liberty are consistent, for when a man throws his goods into the sea for the fear the ship should sink, he doth very willingly, and may refuse to doe it if he wills'
35
liberty surrendered
 ‘lay down certaine rights of nature’  Do ‘not have libertie to do all they lists
36
ome liberties maintained
 'the liberty to buy, sell, and otherwise contract with one another' within the limits of the law,  and allowing men 'to choose their own abode, their own diet, their own trade of life, and to institute their children as they themselves think fit'
37
rule of law
every man giveth away the right of defending another; but not of defending himselfe’ * Should be left to sovereign tool to govern enforced
38
rule of law enforced
covenants, without the sword are but words’
39
rule of law tool to govern
* punishing with corporall or pecuniary punishment’ those who do ‘dis-service’ to the commonwealth * power * ‘provincilal lawes’ ‘not made by custome but byt the soveriegn power’
40
morality
 Determinby ‘the measure o fgood and evil actions ‘ in relation to ‘the civill law’ which is jduged by the ‘rep’ of the commonwealth  Perosnator judges what is and is not just  Without a commonwealth/before ‘constitited great commonwealths’ it was ‘no dishonour to be a pyrate, or a high-way theefe’ no determination law nad moralso m
41
cuh liberty
state of nature
42
constitutional form
not nec monarchist con sovereignty one person most important thing is consent anti mixed constitution too authoritative
43
constituional form not nec monarchist
balance of authorty and liberty  Less likely to make ‘rash’ deciisons as ‘faculty of solid reasoning  Democratic oveirgnty legit and potentially effective  Tolerated fforms like ronan republic or venetian council where soveignty held by people exercised by select magistrates- aristocracy
44
con soverigenty resides one person
 Indivdi may be inclined ‘to private revenges’ and ‘sometimes’ endeavouring ‘the unsettling of the publique peace’
45
anti mixed constition
 ‘not governent’ instead  ‘divisions of the commonwealth into three factions ‘ ‘nor one rep person, but three’
46
too authoritive
 Potential- has all rights and anti mixed constition  Roles- mke appt, reward punish, conduct fp, legislate  Garner favour felmer hobebs and divine right of kngds
47
garner favour
rewarding with riches’ and ‘punsihing with corporall or pecuniary puishment’
48
felmer
patriarcha kig is like a father, publicshe dlate leizabethan * Paternal relationship, divine right of kinds * Roman law les regia describes transfer of powers people to king * Symbolic through the cornation o fthe king- canssay embodies the will of the people as kig james 6th 1st ladi dout
49
james 1st and 6th
o The true law of free monarchies 1598- theoretical defence divine right of iingds- monarchs derive authority from god alone not from people or any earthly institution o James argued that kings are like fathers o their people, their uthrity both absolute and divinely sanctioned
50
hobbes divine right of kings
* Believs should not lean on god,hides away problem, * Peple have been included somehow- lex regia power form god and comes people * Hobbes concern idea not thorugh conquer coronation, ceremony promise to people, portect them not sell kingdom * Promise implies mutial relationship of power once tranfer can eb returned if broken-flimsiness * Hobbes differs people need to surrender their rights , nature of coevrnant * Irrecoverable transfer of rights
51
hobbes where says steer middle course
o Leter dedicatory- aimed to steer a middle course between too grea liberty and stoo much authority
52
why hobbes steering middle course
diggers finge political society levellers more of a problem aiming to appeal both sides as could be interpreted aiming to persuade
53
levellers
more of a problem  Want universal male suffrage, rathe rthan chaosanarchy  Hobbes Concern that would return to mob rule state of naure  Levellers support comes from the army, initially support Cromwell
54
aim to appeal both sides
 Gave copy to Charles ii  People in power read it
55
aim to persude
 Everyone can unite on the fear of state of nature, everohone ultimately wants peace  Thus it the soevriegn authority an fer ‘awesome’ revert state of nature
56
steer middle course- lacks balnce
republicans mixed constition bodin transcend constitional issue
57
republicans
mixed constitution * Aristotle lass balance, economic interest each other * No one element of society above one another * Collective responsibility res publica what is right then collective, leaithan does incoprate this  But hobbes concerned about factionalism, reactive opinons  Aristotle wants flourishing hobbes wants security * Individual right smroe important aritsotle
58
bbodine
rips appart the mixed ocnstition as an illogical conrtsuct * Too many loci of power- splitting power 3 ways
59
transcend constitional issue
as long eng is united * Scientific revolution,c limate 17thc, influenced by Descartes who wanted to destroy traditions * Hobes was bored of debates clascis reaindg cicero, analsysi reply hasn’t worked- eruope was in crisis * Endless debate was the cause of the English civil war
60