Hughes/Ovid- Metamorphoses Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q

Creation, Hughes- shorter, simplified sentences. Undermining the power of the gods? More imperative than Ovid, gives power to the author

A

I summon the supernatural beings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Creation, Hughes- accusative, emphasis on crueller nature of the gods

A

You did it for your own amusement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Creation- a disguise, more sinister than Ovid, gives more agency to nature

A

Nature wore only one mask-/since called Chaos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Creation- Ovid’s version of Hughes nature wearing a mask; contrast, not personified at all

A

Chaos, a raw and undivided mass, Naught but a lifeless bulk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Creation- in Ovid, the elements fight against each other but Hughes introduces the modern sense of war

A

arsenal of entropy/Already at war within it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Creation- Hughes emphasises emptiness with short monosyllabic lines/words that are rare in Ovid

A

No sun
No moon
No earth
No ocean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Creation- Hughes less grandeur of the creation process

A

He rolled earth into a ball

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Creation- Ovid, less human action

A

He rounded it into a mighty sphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Creation- Hughes, god teaches rather than commands, nature seems to have more control

A

‘educated’, ‘instructed’, ‘directed’, ‘taught’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Creation- Hughes more gruesome, uses the same alliteration but seems more harsh and uncomfortable

A

clogged before in the dark huddle of chaos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Creation- Ovid, simple description of darkness without added monstrosity, more personification

A

in darkness blind/long buried.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Creation- Hughes, more glorification of humans

A

Nothing was any closer to the gods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Creation- Ovid, doesn’t present humans as quite as similar to god

A

A holier creature, of loftier mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Creation- Hughes, anachronisms. Double meaning- modern science, but also supernatural substance that comes from the body of a medium and forms material

A

‘sculpted man from his own ectoplasm’ rather than ‘seed divine’, ‘after Jove had castrated Saturn’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Creation- Hughes, theme of dust

A

cradled in its dust un-earthly crystals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Creation- Hughes, much more critical of humans, reflects attitudes of the time

A

These hybrids were deaf/To the intelligence of heaven. They were revolted/By the very idea/of a god and sought only/How to kill each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Creation- Hughes fascinated by Ovid’s theme of states lingering even after metamorphosis

A

Hughes: ‘His every movement possessed/By the same rabid self’ Ovid: ‘yet kept some human trace’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Creation- Ovid’s simple ending

A

drown the human race

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Creation- Hughes’ extrapolation in a stand alone couplet

A

Drowned mankind, imploring limbs outspread,/Floats like a plague of dead frogs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Semele- Juno seems more aggressive in Hughes, in Ovid she seems weaker and jealous

A

Ovid - ‘She means to be a mother by great Jove-/Luck hardly ever mine.’, Hughes- ‘More than I ever gave him.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Semele- Hughes, references to nuclear warfare

A

‘known in heaven/as the general deterrent’, ‘became a silhouette of sooty ashes’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Semele- Hughes, anachronisms

A

‘I shall destroy that whore’, ‘His brat is in her womb’, ‘Something about it smells fishy to me’, ‘That babe was then inserted surgically/Into a makeshift uterus, in Jove’s thigh’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Semele- Hughes description of Bacchus, highlights Ovid’s central theme

A

describes Bacchus as ‘reborn’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Pentheus and Bacchus- Hughes, emphasis on female violence apparent in Ovid, imagery of nature

A

‘And the whole horde of women/Pile on top of him/Like a pack of wild dogs,/Like a squabbling heap of vultures.’

25
Pentheus and Bacchus- Hughes, emphasis on female violence apparent in Ovid, imagery of blood
Her red fingers hooked into the hair/Letting the blood splash over her face and breasts
26
Pentheus and Bacchus- Hughes' emphasises criticism of Pentheus for his doubt of god, elongates his speech
Metaphysicians, where are your systems?/What happened to the great god Reason?
27
Tireisias- Hughes, emphasis on the human indulgence of the gods
Ovid: 'warmed with nectar', Hughes: 'draining another goblet of ambrosia...drowsed in bliss beside him'
28
Tireisias- Hughes, emphasis on the human indulgence of the gods, and Juno's disapproval
It needs more than a mushroom in your cup
29
Tireisias- Hughes anthropomorphism, sexuality
Ovid: described as 'mating', Hughes: 'knotted as before in copulation'
30
Tireisias- Hughes, use of modern pun
strolling to watch the birds and the bees
31
Tireisias- Hughes, more sympathetic towards Juno?
Ovid: her rage is described as 'out of all proportion', Hughes: 'angrier/Than is easily understandable' could be a pun on inability to recognise female struggles? Hughes also gives the man the last word with direct reported speech
32
Tireisias- Hughes, emphasis on change
male as any man
33
Pygmalion- Hughes, makes Pygmalion a more sympathetic character, places the blame more on women
'so he lived/In the solitary confinement/of a phobia.'
34
Pygmalion- Hughes, he has less of a choice than Ovid, seems to be controlled by a greater force whereas in Ovid he decides to
She moved into his hands,/She took possession of his fingers
35
Pygmalion- Hughes, he becomes more threatening than in Ovid
Hughes: 'he half wanted to bruise her', Ovid: 'fears the limbs may darken with a bruise.'
36
Arachne- Hughes emphasises her boldness, more direct and assertive
Ovid: 'Let her contend with me', Hughes: 'I challenge Minerva/To weave better than I weave.'
37
Arachne- Hughes again more proactive in challenging Minerva
Ovid: 'Why doesn't Pallas come herself?', Hughes: 'I make up my own mind,/And I think I always did./If the goddess dare practise what she preaches/Why doesn't she take up my challenge?'
38
Arachne- Hughes emphasises her ignorance but also her destructiveness
She plunged with all her giddy vanity/into destruction
39
Arachne- Hughes, Minerva's attack seems more vicious
Hughes: 'One below between the eyes,then another/Then a third, and a fourth.' Ovid: 'three times, four times, struck Arachne on the forehead'
40
Arachne- Hughes, Arachne is more indignant and takes more control of her fate
Ovid: 'unable to endure it', Hughes: 'She refused to live/with the injustice.'
41
Arachne- Hughes gives Arachne more redemption in allowing her a final extra stanza (and reflects his interest in states lingering after change)
Ovid: 'pursues her former skill', Hughes: 'Her touches/Deft and swift and light as when they were human'
42
Salmacius and Hermaphroditus- Hughes plays even further on the sexual
'let her lust flow hot and startled...open as a flower that offers itself,/wet with nectar.'
43
Salmacius and Hermaphroditus- Hughes also plays on Hermaphroditus' status as a victim
Ovid: 'he knew not what love was', Hughes: 'The boy blushed- he had no idea/what she was talking about'
44
Salmacius and Hermaphroditus- Hughes frequently describes him as young and innocent
He plays, careless as a child/Roams about happily
45
Salmacius and Hermaphroditus- Ovid says she is struck with fear, but Hughes emphasises how she is entirely self interested, explains it more
That scared Salmacius, she thought he really might go.
46
Salmacius and Hermaphroditus- Hughes echoes Ovid in calling her a snake/octopus but plays more violently on her status as a predator
And as the octopus-/A tangle of constrictors, nippled with suckers,/That drag towards a maw-/Embraces its prey.
47
Salmacius and Hermaphroditus- Hughes condemnation of the gods
The gods heard her frenzy-and smiled.
48
Pyramus and Thisbe- Hughes cynical addition of commentary on the story
For angry reasons, no part of the story
49
Pyramus and Thisbe- Hughes plays strongly on the negativity of their love that is rarely mentioned in Ovid
Through signs/Their addiction to eachother/was absolute, helpless, terminal.
50
Pyramus and Thisbe- negativity, Hughes describes their hole through which they speak
This crack, this dusty crawl-space for a spider
51
Pyramus and Thisbe- paints Pyramus as bolder than she is in ovid
She embraced his corpse, fierce as any lion
52
Pyramus and Thisbe- Hughes emphasises the sympathy of the gods
Ovid: 'the gods received her prayer', Hughes: 'The gods were listening and were touched.'
53
Hughes Introduction- what he is fascinated/puts emphasis on from Ovid
'human passion in extremis' when 'the all-too-human victim stumbles out into the mythic arena and is transformed.'
54
Hughes Introduction- says the Metamorphoses reflect his time
register the psychological gulf that opens at the end of an era
55
Sarah Annes Brown, 'The Metamorphoses of Ovid from Chaucer to Ted Hughes'; special bond between our time and Ovid's
implying a special bond between our own age and Ovid's...such a claim is dubious: it is debatable how much impact the death of an obscure Jew would have had on a sophisticated Roman
56
Sarah Annes Brown, 'The Metamorphoses of Ovid from Chaucer to Ted Hughes'; anachronisms
There is certainly plenty in Hughes to jar on the reader in search of classical remoteness...startlingly anachronistic
57
Sarah Annes Brown, 'The Metamorphoses of Ovid from Chaucer to Ted Hughes'; unpleasantness but Hughes actually uses very similar words to Ovid
'a number of unpleasant touches...might seem to owe little to Ovid's famous urbanity and elegance' but 'words, not just objects, are subject to metamorphosis' like in Ovid
58
Sarah Annes Brown, 'The Metamorphoses of Ovid from Chaucer to Ted Hughes'; changes Hughes made to Pygmalion tale
makes his misogyny 'unambiguously pathological' he is 'less unequivocally solicitous than Ovid's...The line ending is poised so that we must wait to learn that his strange wish is in some way justified, and the hint of sadism still lingers.' Hughes adds more 'sexual force'
59
Sarah Annes Brown, 'The Metamorphoses of Ovid from Chaucer to Ted Hughes'; two things at once
Hughes is...engaged by the idea of being two things at once