Infancy capabilities Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

scientific measures

A
  • categorical = no quantitative differences but may have qualitative (binary), nominal = larger selection
  • continuous = more specific ordinal or interval (ratio)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Experimental techniques for testing infants issues

A
  • special techniques needed
  • can’t get them to read a book or follow instruction
  • limitations on Observations: how much can We infer?, What are the Dv?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Problems with testing infants -Paul Bloom

A
  • difficult to learn about mental life of any creature that CANT use lang.
  • Babies poses special challenges: just lie there crying + gurgling
  • However Non-mature animals can express preferences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What can infants do?

A
  • can attend + orientate head to mum + changes in env
  • sneeze, cough, blink, yawn, swallow, grasp
  • can turn head + eyes to show interest + orienting reflex to bright light + loud noise
  • Non-controllable sucking reflex
  • constantly seek out new info As they get bored easily
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ways to experiment on infants

A
  • looking time Methods: spontaneous visual preference
  • Habituation - novelty + memory
  • violation of expectation- magic tricks
  • preferential sucking
  • eye tracking
  • Physiological measures (EEG, heart rate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What can infants see?

A
  • poor at acuity (sharpness) and accommodation (focus) prior to 6 months
  • Acuity of infants is approx 1/30th of perfect adult accuracy
  • poor control over eye focus necessary for sharp focus
  • Both factors rapidly improve over first 6 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

spontaneous visual preference

A
  • infant presented with 2 visual stimuli in left + right visual field
  • stimuli often lead to preferential looking
  • measure which stimulus infant looks at longest + say it prefers it
  • Novel = more looking
  • Bored: less looking
  • DV = looking time
  • Fantz looking chamber accounts for acuity + accommodation
  • Have to be sure looking preference isn’t tendency to look in 1 direction so change direction systematically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

fantz - Biological predisposition to human face visual preference exp

A
  • Presented infants with face configuration a jumbled face + 2 colours as controls
  • infants prefer faces as early as 5 days old
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bushnell 2003- preferential looking at mum VS stranger

A
  • Infant 12 hours old found to prefer looking at mothers face compared to stranger
  • Control = both women gave birth recently, no facial expression or noise + strong perfume to mask smell
  • Mums counterbalance each other + act as stranger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do infants see the human face - salapatek 1975

A
  • first to study eye movement + reveal now infants scan human face + how this changes as visual acuity improves
  • At 1 month infant focus on edges of face
  • At 2 months infant focuses more centrally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Infants prefer attractive faces - Langois et al + Slater et al

A
  • Chimeric face presented = average composition of many faces to produce prototypical face
  • 2 month olds + newborns look longer at attractive faces
  • Infant may be drawn to these as they reflect prototype with stronger facia stimuli for baby to orientate to
  • Innate facia recognition
  • Average + symmetry seen as more attractive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Habituation

A
  • Attention to novelty decreases with exposure
  • infants prefer novel rather than familiar stimuli
  • present same stimulus until infant habituates to it then introduce novel to re-engage attention (Sokolov 1963 and Colombo 2000)
  • used to test infants sensory abilities + memory
  • younger babies can recognise difference in primate faces whereas adults can’t because have 1.5 x as many synapses as adults.
  • As adult brain dev, babies look more at humans + loose the connections
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is face processing species- specific during first year of life? Pascalis, Haan + Nelson

A
  • Adults look longer at unfamiliar adult than familiar
  • 6 months prefer looking at novel human face + novel monkey
  • 9 month old = same as adult
  • Synaptic pruning + perceptual narrowing
  • There’s a window where our facia recog systems are broader
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

investigating infant visual perception using habituation paradigms- Bushnell et al

A
  • Asked mothers to habituate infants to particular shape + colour by showing it to them 2 x 15 min sessions everyday for 2 wks
  • keep colour but introduce new shapes or visa versa
  • infants had some form of memory of shapes + colours
  • Manipulation check: check habituation by exposing to original shape + Monitoring attendance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Habituation as a diagnostic tool

A
  • Habituation rate is an indicator of brain integrity + cog competence
  • Babies cog competence increases with age
  • Birth difficulties can result in slower habituation indicating neurological defects
  • Bornstein + Sigman-> early habituation speed predicts later IQ after 10 years
  • Ross + feldman-> visual recognition memory predicts IQ at 11
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

playing with magic

A
  • when something an infant expects to happen doesn’t, they show surprise
  • Infants seen test trials of moving object
  • presented with a possible + impossible event
  • surprise or visual preference of an unexpected outcome = prolonged looking, increased heart rate
17
Q

violation of expectation method

A
  • stimuli involving moving objects
  • can measure object knowledge in young infants + how they reason about events
  • reveals infants as budding physicists (Speke, 1994)
    -infants show impressive awareness of rules governing physical entities
18
Q

violation of expectation- Baillargeon study

A
  • Habituation event = box slid to end of 2nd box+ then to final box
  • Test events = possible + impossible
  • impossible = box floats
  • infant at 6.5 months act surprised by impossible but increasingly less as they get younger
19
Q

Infants understand gravity- Kim + speckle 1992

A
  • infants look longer at events they perceive as more novel or surprising
  • infants show preference for unnatural events at 7 months but not 5 months
  • surprise = evidence for concept of gravity
  • Habituation event = downward acceleration of ball on hill
  • Normal test event = ball slowing down as it goes up hill
  • impossible = speeding up, up hill
20
Q

Baillargeon’s Drawbridge task

A
  • object permanence is important milestone (Piaget underestimated ability der at 9 Month but found in 3 month olds)
  • infants familiarised with repeated event - flap rotating from flat on table to 180 °
  • possible event = flap rotates but stops when contacts cube
  • impossible = goes through cube
    -3.5 month olds look more at impossible events
21
Q

ECG to measure infants capabilities

A
  • measures heart rate
  • Falls with decreased attention, increases with wariness
  • responds to sounds at 12 weeks gestation (Hepper) -measuring fetal heart
22
Q

High-density event related potentials

A
  • place geodesic net of electrodes on head
  • sensors pick up natural electrical changes as neurons are activated
  • infants brain more widespread activation when presented a face
  • evidence for gradual specialisation + pruning
23
Q

shape perception in newborns - slater et al

A
  • habituated newborns to 1 of 4 shapes + tested familiarity when paired with new shape
  • showed newborns can discriminate between line orientations
  • discriminated on basis of angular relationships
24
Q

Newborns perception of a 3D world - Piaget

A
  • size constancy = object perceived as same size when distance changes
  • shape constancy = perception of constant form from whatever angle its viewed at
  • dev towards end of first year + not present at birth (Piaget)
  • But evidence seen in newbords -> habituated to object of constant size + look longer at objects of different size than new distance
25
perception of object unity - bellman + speckle
- perceiving a complete object despite part of it not being seen - Tested by habituating 4 month olds to rod moving back + forth behind box - Infants looked longer at separate parts because see it as novel as they were peCeiving rod as completed earlier - Johnson + Aslin found it in 2 month olds
26
Perception of object trajectories -Bremner et al
-Habituated infants to object moving back + forth disappearing behind occludes then occluder absent + fond 6 month perceived trajectory continuing/ 4 months did when narrow occluder + 2 months saw it as discontinuous
27
Piaget + Imitation
- Imitation is impossible until infants are capable of representing self + other
28
Imitation in newborns - Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
- Focus on gestures the infant is capable of producing spontaneously - used facial gestures - First month showed a sig tendency to identify gesture and matching the model - Interesting in newborns because have no experience of seeing themselves make the gesture Early imitation is based on intermodal matching between seeing + producing gesture
29
Voice perception + infants preference to mother - Kisilevsky et al 2003
- Found that from 26 weeks gestation onwards, foetal heart rate changed consistency to auditory stimuluation - Prenatal experience examplains why newborns prefer mothers voice over other female voices
30
Voice and speech discrimination - DeCasper + Fifer, 1980 + Spence 1986
- Newborns refer mothers voice compared to female stranger of similar age - Hearing is learnt prior to birth - Mothers read passage repeatedly prior to birth + once born exposed to same passage + novel one - how attentional preference to pre-exposed passage
31
Preference for infant-directed speech (Fernald, 1982)
- Typically use exaggerated patterns where there are more rises + falls in pitch when speaking to an infant - Infants preder to hear this over adult-directed - Attracts infants attention and is clearer for infant to learn from
32
Young infants discriminate different number of items - Starkey and Cooper (1980)
- Habituated 407 month olds to a pattern of particular number of dots - Infants dishabituated to number change in small number (2 or 3) but not larger (4 or 6) - Based on subitising - perceive small number of items without counting
33
Young infants can count - Wynn (1992)
- 4 - 5 month olds presented with 1 object, hid it then added another object + lowered to reveal 1 or 2 objects - Infants looked longer at the 1 object (unexpected event) - Young infants understand addition and subtraction but any larger number doesn't work