Intelligence Flashcards
Are any machines considered intelligence?
despite achievement, none of these machines would be considered “intelligent” by psychologists.
Do psychologists disagree on what intelligence is?
yes
What is genetic essentialism?
a general tendency for us to (falsely) think about certain psychological traits as “fixed” and caused by our genes.
What is Eugenics?
the social movement aimed at improving the human “genetic pool” through selective breeding.
What is intelligence? What does this definition focus on?
- the ability to direct one’s thinking, adapt to one’s changing environment, and learn from experience.
- Intelligence is under this definition about aptitude/potential, and not about what you already know or have done (achievement).
Why is the emphasis on aptitude over achievement important?
There may be reasons out of ones control that have prevented them from doing these things but psychologists believe that doesn’t necessarily take away from intelligence
What is a psychological factor?
a unique mechanism that predicts performance in a domain. This is a mechanism that predicts a lot but not everything. As a result of how this mechanism works we can predict other things. But we can also dissociate other things that don’t depend on it like hearing.
Why is visual acuity a factor? What does it predict?
Visual acuity (e.g., 20/20 vision) is a factor that predicts how well you can see, how
well you can read, how well you can drive, but not how well you can hear.
Why is physical endurance a factor? What does it predict?
Physical endurance is a factor that predicts how far you can run, how long you can swim, whether you are likely to enter a marathon, etc., but not how fast you type words on a keyboard.
What is the single factor theory?
Our performance on one test correlates well with another in a different subject. One theory proposes on the basis of this that intelligence is made up of g and specific factors.
What is general intelligence factor (g)?
the hypothesized single factor of intelligence that partly explains each person’s aptitude in all domains of knowledge.
What are specific factors (s)?
the remaining, selectively learned factors that account for the lack of perfect correlations. For most, this is about achievement in particular subjects, and therefore not intelligence.
What does the theory of g imply about people who lack g?
Some people have a lot of g, and they tend to do well on any intellectual activity.
What does the theory of g imply about people who lack a lot of g?
People who lack a lot of g would generally do poorly on most intellectual things, except when they acquire very specific and selective skills (s).
What does the theory of g say about savants?
Under this view, “savants” are people who lack overall g but have an overabundance of one very specific s factor.
What is the issue with g?
how do we know that correlations between tests are not third variables?
What does the many factor of intelligence suggest?
That there is no one intelligence
What are independent factor theories?
there is no such thing as intelligence (singular), but instead many different intelligences (plural).
- Theories vary dramatically in how many “factors” of intelligence are thought to exist
- Each theory believes that one factor (e.g., mathematical ability) is not related to another (e.g., verbal ability) at all, except through third variable correlations.
What does independent factor theory imply?
- There are no generally intelligent people – only people who are more/less intelligent on specific types of activities (e.g., math, language, etc.).
- There are generally no people who truly lack intelligence – they might often just be misclassified by our culturally narrow view of intelligence.
- “Savants” are individuals who are outliers on one specific subtype.
What do independent factor theories imply about the ability to improve intelligence?
These theories also suggest that you can’t improve your intelligence as a
whole, because intelligence is many things at once.
What is the hybrid theory of intelligence?
the most popular theory that states that intelligence has several “middle-levels” that g fuels, but that various factors can also improve without contributions from g.
Under the hybrid theory what is true of a person with high g?
Under such theories, a person with high g would be better in all the subfactors, but various other things could change a subfactor without affecting overall g.
Does g allows some factors to worsen over time (e.g., due to brain injury) without affecting all the others.
yes
What are the 2 middle levels in the hybrid theory of intelligence?
Fluid intelligence
Crystalized intelligence