Issues And Debates Flashcards
(75 cards)
What is free will?
• Free will suggests as human beings we are
essentially self-determining and free to choose our thoughts and actions
Which approach advocates free will?
Humanistic
What is determinism?
Determinism is the view that an individual’s
behaviour is shaped or controlled by internal or external forces rather than an individual’s will to do something
What is hard determinism also referred to as?
Fatalism
What is hard determinism?
Implies that free will is not possible
• Suggests all human behaviour has a cause and in principle it should be possible to identify and describe these causes
Assumes everything we think and do is dictated
by internal or external forces we cannot control
• For some this position is to extreme
Who proposed soft determinism?
William James (1890)
What is soft determinism?
• Acknowledges that all human action has a cause, but there’s some room for manoeuvre
• People have conscious, mental control over the way they behave
• We have the freedom to make rational conscious choices in everyday situations
What is biological determinism?
The biological approach emphasises the role of biological determinism in behaviour
• There is no doubt that many of our physiological and neurological
processes are not under our conscious control (e.g. influence of the
autonomic nervous system during periods of stress)
• Lots of behaviours and characteristics (e.g. mental disorders) are thought
to have a genetic basis
• Research has demonstrated the effect of hormones (e.g. The role of
testosterone in aggressive behaviour)
What is environmental determinism?
• Our experience of ‘choice’ is merely the sum total of reinforcement contingencies that have acted upon us throughout our lives
• Although we might think we are acting independently, our behaviour has been shaped by environmental events, as well as
agents of socialisation – parents, teachers, institutions etc
• Behaviour is caused by features of the environment e.g. systems of
reward and punishment that we cannot control
What is psychic determinism?
• Freud, like Skinner, agreed that free will is an ‘illusion’
but placed much more emphasis on the influence of
drives and instincts than the behaviourists
• Sees human behaviour as determined and directed by
unconscious conflicts that we cannot control
• There is no such thing as an accident, according to Freud
• Even something as seemingly random and innocuous as a
‘slip of the tongue’ can be explained by the underlying
unconscious
How is determinism consistent with the aims of science?
Determinism is all about causation – behaviour is caused (determined) by something not within the individual’s control
Supports cause and effect
What are the strengths of determinism? / against free will?
1) Determinism is consistent with the aims
of science.
The notion that human behaviour is
orderly and obeys laws places psychology
on equal footing with other more
established sciences.
2) Advances in mental health.
The prediction and control of human
behaviour has led to the development of
treatments, therapies and behavioural
interventions that have benefited many
e.g. drug treatments to control and
manage schizophrenia
• The experience of mental disorders like
schizophrenia where sufferers experience
a total loss of control over their thoughts
and behaviour casts doubt on the
concept of free will (no-one would
‘choose’ to have schizophrenia)
• Therefore in terms of mental illness,
behaviour would appear to be
determined.
3) supporting research.
Neurological studies of decision making
have revealed evidence against free will
• Libet (1985) and Chun Siong Soon et al
(2008) have demonstrated that the brain
activity that determines the outcome of
simple choices may predate our
knowledge of having made such a choice
• The researchers found that the activity
related to whether to press a button with
the left or right hand occurs in the brain
up to ten seconds before participants
report being consciously aware of making
such a decision
• This shows that even our most basic
experiences of free will are decided and
determined by our brain before we
become aware of them.
Describe the interactionist position in the free-will determinism debate?
Typically, an interactionist position may
provide us with the best compromise in the
free will-determinism debate
• Those approaches in psychology that have a cognitive element, such as Social Learning
Theory, are those which tend to adopt a
‘soft determinism’ position.
What are the strengths of free will? / against determinism?
1)Everyday experience ‘gives the
impression’ that we are constantly
exercising free will through the choices
we make on any given day – this gives
face validity to the concept of free will –
it makes cognitive sense.
• Research also suggests that people who
have an internal locus of control,
believing that they have a high degree of
influence over events and their own
behaviour, tend to be more mentally
healthy.
2)Roberts et al (2000) found that
adolescents with a strong belief in
fatalism – that their lives were ‘decided’
by events outside of their control – were
at significantly greater risk of developing
depression.
• This suggests that, even if we do not
have free will, the fact that we think we
do may have a positive impact on mind
and behaviour.
3)Legal System
The hard determinist stance that
individual choice is not the cause of
behaviour is not consistent with the way
in which our legal system operates.
• In a court of law, offenders are held
morally accountable for their actions
• Determinism is unfalsifiable. It is based
on the idea that causes of behaviour will
always exist, even though they may not
have been found – this is impossible to
prove wrong.
• This suggests that the determinist
approach to human behaviour may not
be as scientific as it first appears.
What is the idiographic approach?
Attempts to describe the nature of the individual
• People are studied as unique entities, each with
their own subjective experiences, motivations and
values
• May be no attempt to compare these to a larger
group, standard or norm
• Generally associated with those methods in
psychology that produce qualitative data e.g. case
studies, unstructured interviews and other selfreport measured.
• These methods reflect one of the central aims of
idiographic research: to describe the richness of
human experience and gain insight into the person’s
unique way of viewing the world
What approach to psych is a good example of the idiographic approach?
humanistic
Why is the humanistic approach a good example of the idiographic approach?
Rogers and Maslow were interested only in
documenting the conscious experience of the
individual or ‘self’
• They described themselves as ‘anti-scientific’
• Humanistic psychologists were more concerned with
investigating unique experience ‘on its own merits’
than producing general laws of behaviour
Why may the psychodynamic approach be labelled as idiographic?
• The psychodynamic approach is often labelled
‘idiographic’ because of Freud’s use of the case study
method when detailing the lives of his patients
• However, Freud also assumed he had identified
universal laws of behaviour and personality
development (which is more like the nomothetic
approach)
What is the nomothetic approach?
• The main aim is to produce general laws of human
behaviour
• They provide a ‘benchmark’ against which people can be
compared, classified and measured
• On the basis of this, future behaviour can be predicted
and/or controlled
• This approach is most closely aligned with those methods
that would be regarded as ‘scientific’ within psychology
such as experiments
• Such methods involve the study of large numbers of people
in order to establish ways in which people are similar (and
inform us how people are different from one another)
Why is the cognitive approach nomothetic?
Cognitive psychologists have been able to infer the structure and
processes of human memory by measuring the performance of large
samples of people in laboratory tests
Why is the behaviourist approach nomothetic?
Skinner and the behaviourists studied the responses of
hundreds of rats, cats, pigeons etc. in order to develop the laws of
learning
why is the biological approach nomothetic?
Biological psychologists have conducted brain scans on countless
human brains to make generalisations about localisation of function
What are the strengths for the idiographic approach?/ against the nomothetic approach
1)Single cases may generate a hypothesis for further study .
With its in-depth qualitative methods of
investigation, provides a complete and
global account of the individual
• This may complement the nomothetic
approach by shedding further light on
general laws or indeed by challenging
such laws
• A single case may generate hypotheses
for further study (e.g. the case of HM)
• In the case of brain damaged individuals
(like HM), findings may reveal important
insights about normal functioning which
may contribute to our overall
understanding.
2) The subjective experience is ignored in the nomothetic approach.
The preoccupation within the nomothetic
approach on general laws, prediction and
control has been accused of ‘losing the
whole person’ within psychology.
• Knowing that there is a 1% lifetime risk of
developing schizophrenia tells us little
about what life is like for someone who is
suffering from the disorder.
• In lab studies involving tests of memory
for example, participants are treated as a
series of scores rather than individual
people. Their subjective experience of
the situation is ignored
• In its search for generalities, the
nomothetic approach may sometimes
overlook the richness of human
experience.
Describe the argument that sates the ideographic and nomothetic approach can be complementary rather than contradictory.
Rather than seeing idiographic and nomothetic
approaches as mutually exclusive ‘either/or’
alternatives, it is possible to consider the same
issue or topic from both perspectives,
depending on the nature of the research
question
The goal of modern psychology is to provide
rich, detailed descriptions of human behaviour
as well as the explanation of such behaviour
within the framework of general laws