Issues and Debates Flashcards
Paper 3 (65 cards)
Nature vs Nurture
Debate
Key terms
Interactionist- where environment and heredity interact, they work together rather than in opposition
Heredity- process by which traits are passed down onto offspring, usually refers to genetic inheritance.
Environment- everything outside our body including people, physical events. influence on behaviour that’s non-genetic.
Nature
These are inherited influences
Early nativists such as Descartes argued that human characteristics are innate- the result of our genes.
Psychological characteristics (personality/intelligence) are determined by biological factors.
Topics for Nature
Nature MAOA gene. Gene that is inherited (heritability) that makes you aggressive. This is a gene which can only be inherited and these influences of being aggressive are determined by biological factors.
+=More scientific research- niche picking your nature chooses your nurture.
Nurture
These are environmental influences
Empiricists (Locke)
Argued the mind is a blank slate at birth, and is shaped by interaction with the environment e.g. the behaviourist approach.
Two different experiences
- Prenatal terms (mother smoking)
-Postnatal experiences (conditions a child grows up in)
Topics in Nurture
SLT explanation of aggression. Bandura proposed behaviour is due to a result of operant and classical conditioning but also directly through vicarious reinforcement. Acknowledged the way a person expresses their anger is through environmental influences such as observing and imitating the way the methods of anger expressed by an identified role model.
+= more detailed research(qualitative/self report)
Epigentics= nature changes your nurture. theres a change in genetic activity without changing the genetic code. Maguire taxi study
Maguire Taxi study
Maguire et al study of london taxi drivers showed that theregion of their brains with s patial memory was bigger than in controls, this is because the hippocampi had responded this way. Maguire et al. studied the brains of London taxi drivers and found a larger grey matter volume in the mid-posterior hippocampus, an area of the brain associated with spatial awareness (skills needed for taxi drivers when they are
learning and completing ‘The Knowledge’ exam). There was a positive correlation between increasingly pronounced changes and an increasing length of time that individuals had been taxi drivers. This demonstrates the interactionist nature of empiricism and nativism, and gives further reason as to why the influences of the two cannot be separated.
Limitations of nature
Confounding variables of nurture
Adoption studies to fix
Limitations of nurture
Less scientific in their research methods.
Compromise
Interactionist approach
Diathesis-stress model behaviour is caused by a biological/environmental vulnerability (diathesis) which is only expressed when coupled with an biological/environmental trigger (stressor)
For example, a person who inherits a genetic vulnerability for OCD may not develop the disorder but combined with a psychological trigger ie a traumatic experience this may result in the disorder appearing.
Free will vs determinism
DEBATE
Key terms
Psychic determinism
freuds theory of personality suggests that adult behaviour is determined by a mix of early innate biological drives and unconscious conflict repressed in childhood.
Hard determinism
fatalism- suggests that all human action has a cause and it should be possible to identify these causes
Environmental determinism
behaviour is caused by previous experience such as through operant and classical conditioning. Our experience of choice us the sum total of reinforcement contingencies that have been acted upon us throughout our lives.
Biological determinism
The biological approach describes many causes of behaviour eg the ANS on stress or the influence of genes on mental health. Behaviour is always caused by internal biological forces beyond our control.
Soft determinism
all human action has a cause but people have freedom to make choices within a restricted range of option.
Causal explanations
are often descriptions of mechanisms, or how a change in one thing leads to a change in another.
Free will
Self-determining
Humans are free to make their own choices
There are biological and environmental influences on our behaviour but free will implies they can be rejected. (humanistic approach). Humans are responsible for their actions regardless of innate factors or early experience
Topics on free will
Internal locus control- explanation of resisting social influence, people believe they are in control of their own actions and behaviours and believe their choices have their own consequence they believe outcomes are due to the choices that they have made themselves.
Humanistic approach- self determining behaviour is an important part of human behaviour, as long as an individual remains controlled by other people they can take responsibility for their own actions. Only when individuals take self-responsibility self actualisation or personal growth occurs. Humanism is being seen as a positive approach seeing people as being able to ‘better’ themselves.
+= Good face validity can see in real life where people actually believe in free will an can see we appear to have free will in our day to day lives.
Limitations of free will
Lacks sciencificity can’t objectively be measured.
Benjamin Libet et al (1983) recorded activity in motor areas of the brain before the person had a conscious awareness to move their finger. Chun Soon et al (2008) found activity in the prefrontal cortex up to 10 seconds before a person was aware of their decision to act. This suggests that the motor activity preceding movement occurred before the conscious decision was made, and so implies that all behaviour is pre-determined by up to 10 seconds.
Determinism
Behaviour is caused by internal or external factors that acting upon the individual beyond their control
Topics for determinism
B- Chromosomes and hormones for gender
E-culture and media for gender
P- Oedipus and electra complex for gender
+= Practical application
Limitations of determinism
Legal system doesn’t agree with this view. In court offenders are heald resposible for their actions. Indeed the main principle of the legal system is that the defendant excercised their free will in committing a crime. This suggests that in real world the determinism argument doesnt work.