Joinder Flashcards
(21 cards)
Joinder of Claims Rule Number
18
Joinder of Claims rule states
Party serving a claim can join as many claims as they have against an opposing party
- including counterclaims
- Don’t need to be related
Which claims must be joined
Those that arise from the same facts
Permissive Joinder of Parties Rule Number
20
Permissive Joinder of Parties is always allowed when
the same set of facts is being litigated
Permissive Joinder of Parties Test
- Claims against both parties must arise out of the same transaction or occurrence and
- Question of law or fact common to all Ds
If a party is properly joined they can
bring any claim against an opposing party
Must bring a counter claim when
it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence
- Are the issues of fact and law raised in the claim and counterclaim largely the same
- Will substantially the same evidence support or refute the claim as well as the counterclaim
- Is there any logical relationship between the claim and counterclaim
Crossclaims must
arise from the same transaction or occurrence as the original action
- can bring a crossclaim, making parties adverse, then join all claims against that party
Impleader allows
D to assert a claim against a new party to pass along some or all liability to the third party
Impleader Rule number
14a
Impleader rule states
- Can indemnify someone who is or may be liable for all or some of the claims against them
- Can’t use to say it was actually someone else who was directly liable when you could also be directly liable
Required Parties Rule
19
What parties are required
- Doesn’t deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction
- Can’t get complete relief without the party
- The outcome would affect the party’s interest
- The party will be subject to more obligations
Intervention as of right (rule 24)
- Statute confers the right to intervene
- When 3 conditions are met
- The applicant claims an interest in the transaction that is at issue
- Disposition as a practical matter will impede the applicant’s ability to protect that interest, and
- The applicant’s interests aren’t adequately represented by a party that is in the lawsuit
Permissive intervention
As long as there is a claim or defense that shares with the action a common question of law or fact they may be allowed to intervene
Class Action Requirements
- Common interest among class members
- Large number of members
- Claims are the same
- The representative’s representation must be adequate
- There must be some formal steps (designating the class, notice to class members, etc.)
People in the class are bound even if
they are absent from the litigation
Certifying a class action prerequisites (rule 23)
- Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable
- There are question of law or fact common to the class
- The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class and
- The representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interest of the class
Definitions of Classes 23(b)(2)
The defendant has acted in a way that applies generally to the class and the final relief is appropriate as applied to the class as a whole
Definitions of Classes 23(b)(3)
- The questions of law or fact common to the class members predominates over questions only affecting individual members
- And a class action is superior to other methods available for fairly adjudicating the controversy