JWI - research methods Flashcards
(21 cards)
what are the 7 parts of a psychological report
- abstract
- introduction
- method
- results
- dicussion
- references
- appendices
what is in the abstract
a summary of the study including aims, hypothesis, method(procedures), results, conclusions and implications. It allows the reader to determine if the rest of the report is worth reading
what is the introduction
- review of previous research that are relevant to the current study
- should lead logically to your research so the reader is convinced why you’re doing the research
- ends with the researcher stating thei aims and hypotheses
what is the method
a detailed description of what the researcher did. there should be enough detail for someone to precisely replicated the study
what are the 5 different parts of the method
- design
- participants
- apparatus/materials
- procedures
- ethics
what is in the results
-
descriptive statisitcs- tables and graphs showing frequencies and measures of central tendency and measures of dispersion
-** Inferential statistics **- calculated values, critical values, significance levels and a justification of which test has been chosen. There should also be a statement about whether the null hypothesis is accepted or rejected - if the study uses qualitative research, then categories and themes are described with examples of each category/theme
what is in the discussion
the research aims to interpret the results and consider their implications
- summary - results are breifly verbaly report
- relationship to previous research
- strengths and weaknesses of the methodolody (with improvements suggested)
- implications for theories and possible real-world application
- suggestions for future research
what is in the references
the full details of any journal articles, book or websites that are mentioned
what is in the appendices
where any materials and raw data are presented
what are the three main purposes of peer review
- allocation of research funding
- publication of research in scientific journals and books
- assessing the research rating of university departments
why is peer reviewing important
- its a way to check the validity of research, the credibility of the research and assess the quality and appropriateness of the way that the study was designed
- peers can judhe how important the reserach is in the wider context of pyschology
- helps to prevent false or unscientific reserach being accepted as true.
what is the peer review process
- the reviewers are sent work by a journal editor < – their task is to report on the quality of the research. There are usually three options for reviewers to recommend:
1. the research should be published as it is
2. research needs revising
3. research should be rejected
what is the usual form of a peer review and what is a potential issue
single blind review, which involves the names of the reviewers not being revealed by the researchers < – lead to anonymity and unbiased review
issue - rewviewers delaying their reviews so that they can published similar research and/or hide behind their anonymity to be overly harsh
how to overcome the issue involving single-blind reviews
a double blind review can be used wehere both the reviewers and researchers are anonymous
this is intended to prevent bias against the researcher based on name,age,ethnicty etc.
what is face validity
whether a test, scale or measure appears to measure what is is supposed to at first glace (‘on the face of it’)
what is triangulation
the use of a number of different sources of evidence, it multiple qualitative findings cooroborate with one another, the findings triangulate. they support one another, adding to the validity of the findings
what is concurrent validity
the concurrent validity of a particular test or scale is demonstrated when the results obtained are very close to or match those obtianed on another recognised and well-established test measuring the same concept/construct
what is reliability
a measure of consistency. it refers to how consistent the findings from an investigation or measuring device are
a measuring device is said to be reliable if it produces consistent results everytime it is used
what is test-retest reliability
adminstering the same test or questionnaire to the same person(or people) on different occassions
- if the test or questionnaire is reliable, then the results obtained should be the same, or at least similar each time they are adminstered.
- The two sets of scores are correlated using a appropriate statistical test wtih a significant positive correlation (+0.8)
- there must be sufficient time between test and retest
what is interobserver (or inter-rater when used in studies that aren’t observations) reliability
- two or more observers watch the data, then discuss and agree beforehand their interpretation of the behaviourably categories
- they then watch the same event but record the data separately, using the same categories
- data colllected is then correlated using an appropriate statistical test, with a strong positive correlation (+0.8) indicating good reliability .
how can the reliability of an observation be improved
- make sure behavioural categories are operationalised, measurable and self-evident
- categories should not overlap and all behaviours should be covered on the checklist