L16-20 Research Methods Flashcards
(34 cards)
**
what are overt and covert observations
overt - participants behaviour is watched and recorded with their knowledge and consent
covert - participants behaviour is watched and recorded with their knowledge and consent
what are behavioural categories
when a targe behaviour is broken up into components that are observable and measurable
what is a structured observation
when the researcher uses various sytems to organise the observation
- choosing behavioural categories
- using a sampling method
what is an unstructured observation
every instance of behaviour is recorded in as much detail as possible. This is useful if the behaviours you are interested in do not occur very often
what is a participant observation
what is a non participant observation
participant - the researcher ecomes a member of the group whose behaviour he/she is watching and recording
non participant - the researcher remains outside of the grou whose behaviour they’re recording
what is continuous, time and event sampling
continuous - when they record everything they see in as much detail (providing qualitative data)
time - a target individual or group is first established then the researcher records their behaviour in a fixed time frame every 60 seconds
event - a target behaviour or event is first established then the researcher records this event every time it occurs
what is a naturalistic observation
what is a controlled observation
naturalistic - watching and recording behaviour in the setting within which it would normally occur
controlled - watching and recording behaviour within a structured environment i.e. one where some variables are managed
s + w of naturalistic observations
s - high external validity as findings can be generalised
w - lack of control meaning replication is difficult, could be uncontrolled confounding variables
s + w of controlled observations
s - confounding variables are less of a factor so replication is easier
w - can’t generalise to everyday life
s + w covert observations
s - removes demand characteristics,
ensures behaviour observed is natural <– increases internal validity
w - ethics may be questionsed as people may not wish to have their behaviour observed
s + w overt observations
s - more ethically acceptable
w - demand characteristics (the knowledge participants have that they are being observed may act as a significant influence on their behaviour)
s+w participant observations
s - researcher can experience situation increasing external validity
w - researcher may lose objectivity if they come to identify too strongly with those they’re studyign
s+w unstructured observations
s - more richness and depth of detail in data collected
w - tent to produce qualitative data which is harder to analyse, greater risk of observer bias as objective behavioural categories aren’t present
s+w structured interviews
s - data more likely quantitative meaning its easier to analyse and compare
w - less detail
how are observations better than self report techniques
- an observation allows us to see peoples actual behaviour rather than what they say they will do
- participants may become disengaged with self-report technique
how might self report techniques be better than observations
- if exploring thoughts and feelings, the participant has greater insight than a researcher so getting them to report is more effective than observing thoughts and feelings
what is content analysis (2 marks)
a systematic analysis of qualitative data (a form of media e.g. newspaper articles). The data is placed into categories and counted (creating quantitative data). A different version of a content analysis, called a themantic analysis, means that the qualitative data can be analysed in themes (keeping data qualitative)
how would a pyschologist carry out a content analysis
4 steps
- watch the media
- identify categories (would need examples in an EQ)
- then re-watch videos
- tally/count each occurence of any of the categories to give us quantitative data
what are the two ways of assessing reliability
- inter-rater reliability
- test-retest reliability
what is inter-rater reliability
the two psychologists could carry out the content analysis of the films seperately (they watch the clips and create the categories separately, agree on them and do the analysis **separately using the same data and same categories **) and compare their answers looking for an agreement (correlation of +0.8 or above = reliable)
what is test-retest reliability
the pyschologist could conduct the content analyis (including watching the clips and creating the categories) and then repeat the content analysis on a second occassion using the same data (e.g. films) and the same categories and a later data and compare the two sets of data looking for an agreement (correlation of 0.8 or above = reliable)
what is primary data
results collected directly for a specific research purpose (aim). It arrives first hand from the participants
what is secondary data and what is one way of gathering it
using results that were gathered previously by someone else, often for a different purpose. One way of doing this is meta analysis - a process of collecting and collating a wide range of results from a number of studies on a specific topic to provide an overall conclusion. The collated research is reviewed together. If this is done on quantitative data, the result is called an effect size
what is a case study
An indepth investigation, description and analysis of an individual, group, institution or event