L9-11 Flashcards

(63 cards)

1
Q

Teamwork

A

Individual player’s decisions have positive spillovers on productivity of other team members, hence they affect teamwork and the team’s performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

we model productivity spillovers by

A

assuming that each player’s cost of action decreases in action of the other player: the higher is the action (effort) of other player, the lower is my cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

source of inefficiency in teamwork

A

individual’s failure to internalize the effects of own actions and/or costs on other team members /has no say in what the other’s action is/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

extreme case of teamwork

A

pure cooperation, which takes place when productivity of another team member is unaffected by my decision, but each player’s decision has positive spillovers on the payoffs of all players

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Simple model of teamwork (partnership game)

the payoffs of p1 and p2

A

payoff to p1 = 2(x+y+cxy)-x^2

payoff to p2 = 2(x+y+cxy)-y^2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Simple model of teamwork (partnership game)

each player’s payoff ..

A

increases in the action by the other layer, due to the complementary parameter c>0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

BR function of a player is

A

a function that for each her possible belief about other player action identifies the action of the player that maximizes her payoff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why team will act inefficiently

A

because players dont internalize the benefit their action has on other players and individually acting they won’t choose the joint payoff maximization since it is not a NE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Oligopoly

A
  1. Firms dont behave as price-takers, but their actions affect demand
  2. There’s no entry (only fixed n of firms)
  3. Consumers take prices as given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In oligopolies, firms maximize their profit along the

A

residual demand (the demand expected not to be satisfied by the other firms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3 types of models

A
  1. Cournot competition
  2. Bertrand competition
  3. Stackleberg model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cournot competition

A
  1. Firms set quantities SIMULTANEOUSLY
  2. As the number of firms increases, prices decrease and competition becomes more severe
  3. When firms differ in costs, the more efficient firm produces more
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bertrand competition

A
  1. 1 homogeneous good
  2. 2 firms, same cost function
  3. firms set PRICES, independently and simultaneously
  4. each firm can satisfy any demand ( if no capacity constraints)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bertrand paradox

A

Competition is as severe as perfect competition with 2 firms only

Think of a f1 setting price of 1 and f2 setting p of 0.99 (f2 gets all customers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stackleberg model

A

Firms set quantities, one after another, they move SEQUENTIALLY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cournot model of imperfectly competitive market

A
  1. Firms set quantities, independently and simultaneously
  2. Market has 1 homogeneous good
  3. Market entry is impossible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cournot model of imperfectly competitive market - real life examples

A

A) when several firms dominate the market, and despite the fact that the market is in principle “open” to entry the costs of entry prevent it
B) the competitor’s product is perceived as differentiated (soft drinks vs coca cola) -> no perfect competition
C) More: Airline companies, oil market, Boeing and Airbus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Cournot competition symmetric duopoly insight

A

Choosing capacity and then competing in prices results in the same behavior as when choosing quantity directly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Sources of barriers into a market

A
  1. Economies of scale
  2. Product differentiation - entrants are forced to invest heavily in advertising
  3. Capital requirements
  4. Switching costs - one time costs that the buyer faces when switching an existing suppliers product to a new entrant
  5. Access to distribution channels
  6. Cost disadvantages independent of scale - Inc may have cost advantages that cant be replicated by potential entrants (location, access to raw material, government subsidies)
  7. Government policy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Asymmetric Cournot duopoly

A

Firms set quantities, independently and simultaneously

2 firms, asymmetric (linear) costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Symmetric Cournot duopoly

A

Firms with symmetric costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Positive consequences of Cournot duopoly

A

Joint profit on the Cournot competition is LOWER than when firms coordinate their decisions and act as monopolists, and the total quantity is higher and prices lower. -> Lower profits vs Higher customer surplus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Duopoly is less efficient than….,

but more efficient than…

A

Duopoly is less efficient than a perfect competitive market,

but more efficient than a monopoly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The BR function of a firm in the Cournot model of a firm is

A

decreasing in the Q of the other firm -> the more the other firm produces, the less the firm itself will optimally produce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
The actions of the firms in Cournot model are
strategic substitutes - if 1 firm produces less, the other firm substitutes for the quantity withdrawn and produces more.
26
The actions of the firms in team production (partnership) are
strategic complements - the BR functions of 2 firms are increasing in each other actions - if one firm produces more, then the other optimally will also produce more
27
Increasing the n of firms in a symmetric oligopoly
Suppose each firm has payoff: (100-q1-q2...-qn)*qi-cqi and it always yields: q*= (100-c) / N+1
28
N-firm Cournot competition shows that
1. Each firm's individual output decreases in N 2. Aggregate output of the whole Cournot market with N firms Q* = Nq* is increasing with the number of N 3. As N increases, output increases to that of a perfectly competitive market, and price decreases to MC
29
Stackleberg model market relevance
Leader has to be committed to the action, otherwise impossible to account for the second movers behavior
30
Examples of Stackleberg
Brand vs non-brand producer - the brand producer is committed and doesn't switch between markets; non-brand producer is flexible and follows the leader
31
Who moves first in Stackleberg model
The leader and has a first-mover advantage = power, and produces more than the follower
32
How do we solve Stackleberg
The leader sets the quantity and the follower observes and moves after the leader, hence, the follower maximizes on the observed choice of the leader, so we always START WITH THE FOLLOWER!!! FOC of F2, because we use backwards induction as the firms move sequentially
33
Stackleberg vs Cournot
1. Total output is lower than Cournot 2. Price higher than Cournot 2. Symmetric Stackleberg is more competitive than symmetric Cournot
34
Increasing the N of firms in Cournot oligopoly leads to
increasing efficiency - overall output increases/price decreases
35
Strategic actions of firms in Bertrand model are
Strategic complements
36
Under incomplete information about costs structure of Cournot competing firms, efficient firms have incentives to... and inefficient ...
efficient firms have incentives to signal their own type (product guarantees) inefficient firms benefits from committing to Not respond to the information (fixed price guarantees)
37
Real-world examples of Bertrand model
``` many services (easy to extend supply without additional fixed costs) – e.g. book publisher (variable costs change when printing more books, not fixed costs) ```
38
We cant use derivatives to find the BR functions and the equilibrium in Bertrand model, because
the demand that a firm faces is not continuous
39
Bertrand competition: | BR function of firm 1 to firm's 2 price BR1(p2) =
. if p2p2 and sell nothing (but make no losses) ... if p2>c but p2≤pM, then 1 will set p1=p2 - е and sell all ... if p2>c and p2>pM, then 1 will set p1=pM and sell all as monopoly ... if p2=c then 1 will set p1=c OR p1
40
The only NE in Bertrand market is
one where both firms charge p at the MC p1=p2=c A profit maximizing firm won't set p lower than p that results in 0 profits, the minimal p a firm is willing to charge is the MC p=c>0
41
Adding capacity constraints to Bertrand model (Edgeworth duopoly model)
There is no pure strategy NE, because the second firm will always charge less than the first. Hence, it results in a range of prices, the firms randomized between with some minimum price pmin > MC, therefore even with capacity constraints they make positive profits with competition in prices
42
Price dispersion
selling the same product at different prices in the same market
43
Dixit model Commitment: entry is deterred in a sequentially rational way only if commitment is
successful and the threat is credible: Pm-Pd > C > Pd-Pw
44
Hold-up problem cause
When economic actors could jointly arrive at economically profitable specific agreement, but cannot write a complete contract at the time they initiate their cooperation, they face a hold up problem
45
Hold up problem
the first mover invests into the production before the benefits an be contractually agreed, whereupon the second mover can extract all bargaining surplus due to the asset specificity (no market for it elsewhere)
46
solutions to hold-up problem
A) write contracts precluding power abuse B) create long-run relationships C) internalize the problem by taking over the bargaining partner D) Integrate services/suppliers into own firm
47
types of product differentiation
vertical = quality differences, same function horizontal = same quality, different function
48
Sources of product differentiation
Natural = location, technology, associations (Russian vodka), consumer preferences Strategic - additional services, misleading advertising, higher rate of replacement (switching from Apple to Microsoft)
49
The EU Commission monitors
1. agreements between companies that restrict competition (cartels) 2. abuse of dominant position 3. mergers 4. efforts to open markets to competition 5. financial support (state aid) for companies from EU governments 6. cooperation with national competition authorities in EU countries
50
Competition is
a basic mechanism of the market economy that encourages: 1. companies to offer consumers goods and services on the most favorable 2. efficiency and price reduction 3. innovation
51
Collusion
Price fixing with the goal to shift profits to the colluding firms
52
tacit collusion
coordinated behavior without explicit coordinating actions (communication), non-committing exchange (dinners), lowest price guarantees etc.
53
Collusion as a prisoners dilemma
T > C > D > S Deviating from cartel agreement does not pay off for firm if the discount factor is higher than the threshold value of discount factor d = (T-C)/ (T-D)
54
If the threshold discount factor is higher
the collusion is less likely
55
Factors affecting successful cartel / collusion
1. cartel profitability - ability to exert impact on demand and raise prices = cooperation value 2. cartel enforcement - ability to prevent cartel members from freeriding = long-run defection value
56
Factors facilitating collusion - cartel profitability
1. N of firms 2. Elasticity of demand 3. Control over input 4. Asymmetries 5. Low threat of entry 6. Demand stability
57
Factors facilitating collusion - cartel enforcement
1. Info on deviations of other firms - market transparency 2. Frequency of orders 3. Visibility of outputs, geographical distance 4. Stable demand to be able to detect cheaters 5. N of firms 6. Similar products
58
EU Antitrust policy
Antitrust policy = actions against cartels
59
cartel
group of similar, independent companies which join together to fix prices, to limit production or to share markets or customers between them
60
collusion
explicit commitment to an agreed course of action of individual cartel members
61
Leniency policy
Encourages companies to hand over inside evidence. The first company in any cartel to do so will not have to pay a fine
62
Leniency Notice
allows the Commission to offer full immunity or a reduction in the fines on a cartel member in exchange for disclosure of information on the cartel and cooperation with the investigation
63
Fine system
1. Size dependent on duration of a cartel - fines may be based up to 30% of the company's annual sales to which the infringement relates, multiplied by the n of years of participation in the infringement 2. Entry fee 3. Repeated offenders - will be fined more heavily (up to 100% of sales)