L9-11 Flashcards
(63 cards)
Teamwork
Individual player’s decisions have positive spillovers on productivity of other team members, hence they affect teamwork and the team’s performance.
we model productivity spillovers by
assuming that each player’s cost of action decreases in action of the other player: the higher is the action (effort) of other player, the lower is my cost
source of inefficiency in teamwork
individual’s failure to internalize the effects of own actions and/or costs on other team members /has no say in what the other’s action is/
extreme case of teamwork
pure cooperation, which takes place when productivity of another team member is unaffected by my decision, but each player’s decision has positive spillovers on the payoffs of all players
Simple model of teamwork (partnership game)
the payoffs of p1 and p2
payoff to p1 = 2(x+y+cxy)-x^2
payoff to p2 = 2(x+y+cxy)-y^2
Simple model of teamwork (partnership game)
each player’s payoff ..
increases in the action by the other layer, due to the complementary parameter c>0
BR function of a player is
a function that for each her possible belief about other player action identifies the action of the player that maximizes her payoff
Why team will act inefficiently
because players dont internalize the benefit their action has on other players and individually acting they won’t choose the joint payoff maximization since it is not a NE
Oligopoly
- Firms dont behave as price-takers, but their actions affect demand
- There’s no entry (only fixed n of firms)
- Consumers take prices as given
In oligopolies, firms maximize their profit along the
residual demand (the demand expected not to be satisfied by the other firms)
3 types of models
- Cournot competition
- Bertrand competition
- Stackleberg model
Cournot competition
- Firms set quantities SIMULTANEOUSLY
- As the number of firms increases, prices decrease and competition becomes more severe
- When firms differ in costs, the more efficient firm produces more
Bertrand competition
- 1 homogeneous good
- 2 firms, same cost function
- firms set PRICES, independently and simultaneously
- each firm can satisfy any demand ( if no capacity constraints)
Bertrand paradox
Competition is as severe as perfect competition with 2 firms only
Think of a f1 setting price of 1 and f2 setting p of 0.99 (f2 gets all customers)
Stackleberg model
Firms set quantities, one after another, they move SEQUENTIALLY
Cournot model of imperfectly competitive market
- Firms set quantities, independently and simultaneously
- Market has 1 homogeneous good
- Market entry is impossible
Cournot model of imperfectly competitive market - real life examples
A) when several firms dominate the market, and despite the fact that the market is in principle “open” to entry the costs of entry prevent it
B) the competitor’s product is perceived as differentiated (soft drinks vs coca cola) -> no perfect competition
C) More: Airline companies, oil market, Boeing and Airbus
Cournot competition symmetric duopoly insight
Choosing capacity and then competing in prices results in the same behavior as when choosing quantity directly
Sources of barriers into a market
- Economies of scale
- Product differentiation - entrants are forced to invest heavily in advertising
- Capital requirements
- Switching costs - one time costs that the buyer faces when switching an existing suppliers product to a new entrant
- Access to distribution channels
- Cost disadvantages independent of scale - Inc may have cost advantages that cant be replicated by potential entrants (location, access to raw material, government subsidies)
- Government policy
Asymmetric Cournot duopoly
Firms set quantities, independently and simultaneously
2 firms, asymmetric (linear) costs
Symmetric Cournot duopoly
Firms with symmetric costs
Positive consequences of Cournot duopoly
Joint profit on the Cournot competition is LOWER than when firms coordinate their decisions and act as monopolists, and the total quantity is higher and prices lower. -> Lower profits vs Higher customer surplus
Duopoly is less efficient than….,
but more efficient than…
Duopoly is less efficient than a perfect competitive market,
but more efficient than a monopoly
The BR function of a firm in the Cournot model of a firm is
decreasing in the Q of the other firm -> the more the other firm produces, the less the firm itself will optimally produce