Language and Occupation Flashcards

1
Q

What is ‘Inter-Organisation Communication’?

A

Takes place between different organisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is ‘Intra-Organisation Communication’?

A

Takes place within an organisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is ‘External Communication’?

A

Communication from an institution to an external group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the term ‘To Codify’ mean?

A

Using language that’s designed to include groups of people, the process of inclusion occurs because people understand the lang that’s being used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the term ‘To exclude’ mean?

A

The concept of exclusion doesn’t mean that lang is being used to deliberately exclude people, more that it’s used amongst specific groups w/ particular knowledge or understanding of a field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the term ‘Discourse Community’ mean?

A

It’s used to represent the desire to form communities and all occupations have them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by the term ‘Legalese’?

A

Language of Law and is pejorative term, associated with the traditional style of legal writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a theory that can be linked to ‘Legalese’?

A

David Mellinkoff in ‘The Language of the Law (1963)’ says “The law is a profession of words”
Whether it’s legislation, classroom activities or documents of restriction on daily life, the words of the law are the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some problems with ‘Legalese’?

A
  • Can be difficult to understand, esp. with the general public
  • In a Democracy, the law should be accessible for all
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is meant by the term ‘Function Shifting’?

A

Many common words have uncommon meanings when used in an occupational context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the five functions of Language?

A
  • Communicating info
  • Requesting help
  • Confirming arrangements
  • Instructing employees/colleagues to do something
  • Making things or enacting them to happen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the term ‘Jargon’ mean?

A

Specialist vocab of an occupation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can jargon be used positively?

A

Allows people to communicate quickly and effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can jargon be used negatively?

A

Not all can understand and can be used to gain superiority and power over those who don’t understand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Cameron’s ‘Call Centre Research’ theory?

A
  • Concludes that such telephone interactions are subject to a worrying degree of managerial control, characterised by ‘codification’ and ‘surveillance’
  • Research showed that many call centres give very detailed specifications or even full scripts for what the agent should say and that the calls are monitored + recorded and used as a basis for appraisal
  • She says, this results in a standardisation of interactions + reduction of autonomy of call centre employees

Concludes that all call centres are ‘communication factories’ with employees working in conditions similar to a production line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was Drew and Heritage’s ‘Institutional Talk’ theory?

A

Workplace or professional talk differs from ordinary conversation in a number of ways:

  • goal orientation
  • turn-taking rules or restrictions
  • allowable contributions
  • professional lexis
  • structure
  • asymmetry

Suggested that members of a discourse community share inferential frameworks with each other, consisting of an implicit way of thinking, communicating, and behaving

17
Q

What was Goffman’s ‘Face Theory’?

A

Politeness theory - an individual has both positive and negative needs

18
Q

What was Koester’s ‘Interpersonal Relationships’ theory?

A
  • Importance of phatic (conveying emotions rather than ideas) talk is in getting jobs done
  • Although some employers are represented as discouraging talk that’s not strictly work-related, Koester shows that being sociable and engaging in personal chat is an important aspect in effective working
  • As well as power, then, solidarity - the ability to connect with one’s workmates - is an important dimension in workplace communication
19
Q

What was Swales’ ‘Discourse Communities’ theory?

A

He defined a discourse community as having members who:

  • Share a set of common goals
  • Communicates internally
  • Using + ‘owning’ one or more genres of communication
  • Use specialist lexis + discourse
  • Possess a required level of knowledge + skill to be considered eligible to participate in the community
20
Q

What was Nelson’s ‘Business Language’ theory?

A

Found what he describes as a ‘semantic field of business’ involving a limited number of semantic categories:

  • terms to do with ‘business people
  • companies
  • institutions
  • money
  • business events
  • places of business
  • time
  • modes of communication
  • lexis concerned with technology’
21
Q

What was Brown and Levinson’s ‘+/- Face Needs’ theory?

A
  • Developed a theory of how the notion of face, which has to do with basic human needs + feelings of self-worth, influences how people interact. Negative face + Positive face
  • Positive or negative face can be threatened in various interactive situations by what Brown and Levinson call face-threatening acts
22
Q

Fairclough’s ‘Unequal Encounters’ theory summary

A

Fairclough:

People in power decide what is correct and appropriate in conversation

23
Q

Pateman: power comes in two forms

A

Pateman: power comes in two forms:

  1. REPRESSIVE - coercive, solidarity
  2. OPPRESIVE - top down, controlling
24
Q

Michael Nelson; Business Jargon

A

Michael Nelson; Business Jargon

Business lang is field-specific + involves semantic fields to do with money, people, and events

25
Q

Levine’s theory

A

Levine:
Employers prefer to stick to non-personal topics in small talk to maintain a degree of social distance, whereas employees appreciate this opportunity to engage in small talk

26
Q

Janet Holmes’ theory

A

Janet Holmes:
Looked at small talk in New Zealand workplaces and found senior staff set agenda, give orders + summarise decisions - to do this, they use subtle strategies like convert prestige

27
Q

Ng and Bradac’s theory

A

Ng and Bradac:

Looked at ways of exercising covert prestige over others this is increasingly the way power is being exercised

28
Q

Howard Giles’ ‘Accommodation Theory’

A

Accommodation Theory:

We can converge our language to help a customer understand + not to threaten them with jargon

29
Q

Kim and Elder’s theory

A

Kim and Elder:

Occupational lang is culturally relative - Korean and USA air traffic control struggle to communicate with jargon

30
Q

Brown and Levinson’s ‘Face Theory’

A

Face Theory:
Positive Face = forming bonds with others, having status + being included in the conversation, feeling valued
- could use positive politeness strategies to achieve a positive face

Negative Face = getting your view across unimpeded, keeping a level of distance + respect between yourself and others

31
Q

Drew and Heritage’s theory summary

A

Drew and Heritage:

We expect to be spoken to in different ways by different occupational jobs

32
Q

John Swales’ theory summary

A

John Swales:
Discourse communities - language used by people in the same field, have the same goals + specialist lexis, a certain level of knowledge is required to be able to use it

33
Q

What is meant by ‘Styling’?

A

Implicit scripts for interaction with customers that give a uniformed experience

34
Q

What theory did Pateman (1980) conclude about Power in the workplace?

A

Pateman (1980):
Examines power from the perspective of:
Oppressive (power) and repressive (top-down/coercive power - superior emphasising solidarity to gain listeners goodwill) discourse