Language, Thought And Communication Flashcards
(42 cards)
AO1 Piagets theory (language though and communication)
He believes we learn by developing schemas about the world.
Language depends on thought. Children develop language by matching the correct word to their knowledge.
Thought and understanding comes first, language develops afterChildren only understand words when they have reached the correct stage of development and are ready.
They can have language without understanding but will not be able to use it effectively. In the Sensorimotor stage: Children speak towards the end of their first year.
Pre-operational stage: From 2 years they talk about things not present. Concrete operational stage: By 7 children’s language becomes mature and logical as they question things and create their own ideas.
AO3 Piagets theory (language thought and communication)
Supporting evidence early language is not random.
When children start talking they use two-word phrases like ‘Mummy sock’, which shows they can see how objects relate to each other. This suggests that children only start to use language when they have some understanding of it.
Language comes first Sapir–Whorf hypothesis challenges Piaget.
It states that language comes before thought as people need a word or phrase for an object in order to think about it.
This suggests that Piaget may have been wrong.
schemas cannot be scientifically measured.
It is very difficult to know if schema exist as we cannot directly measure them.
This shows that Piaget’s theory of language and thought is not based on solid scientific evidence.
Schema
A mental framework of believes and expectations that influence cognitive processing
AO1 Sapir whorf hypothesis
Sapir and Whorf suggested it is not possible to think about something you don’t have words for.
Thinking depends on language Language comes first and thought afterwards.
There are two versions of the hypothesis
The strong version: language determines thought If there are no words for a thought, object or idea then you can’t think about it.
This is why it is difficult to translate ideas from one language to another.
The weak version: language influences thought Words help to ‘carve up’ the world. However, you can still imagine something with no words for it.
Weaker version is preferred. If the words we have for a concept or idea are limited, our ability to notice or recall that idea will be limited.
AO3 Sapir whorf hypothesis
The differences are exaggerated differences between cultures may have been exaggerated by Boas. There are really only two words for snow in Inuit culture and actually English has other words for different types of snow.
This shows that the differences aren’t that great and challenges the conclusion that language may determine thought.
Thoughts come before language having more words for snow doesn’t mean the words came first.
The Inuit language may have more words for snow because there is always lots of snow.
This suggests that language develops because of the way we perceive our environment, which supports Piaget’s view that thinking influences language.
Restricted and elaborated code A strength is that the hypothesis explains the link between language and intelligence.
Bernstein suggested that working-class children will always fall behind in school because their use of the restricted code will have a negative effect on their ability to think.
This shows that language influences a particular type of thinking (intelligence).
AO1 Von Frisch bee study
Aim To describe the dances performed by honey bees to explain how they communicate information to each other. Von Frisch put a food source close to the hive (within about 10–20 metres), as well as one further away (up to 300 metres).
He made over 6000 observations of honey bees over 20 years.
Worker bees tell the others where pollen is located by two types of dance:
Round dance: Moving in a circle to indicate food is less than 100 metres away.
Waggle dance: Moving in a figure of eight, waggling its abdomen in the ‘middle’ of the eight, with this straight line pointing at the source of pollen. Speed indicates distance.
60% of bees went to food sources at the distance indicated by the dances. Bees use a sophisticated form of animal communication.
The signalling system has evolutionary value as it helps their survival.
AO3 von Frisch bee study
Scientific valueVon Frisch’s work made an important contribution to science.
People knew that bees danced but had no understanding of the meaning of the movements.
This shows how valuable his research was.
Sound matters too the importance of sound was overlooked.
When bees performed dances in silence, other bees would not then go on and investigate food sources (Esch).
This shows that sound-based signals also play a part in directing other bees – something that Von Frisch did not consider.
Other factors are important bees do not always respond to the waggle dance.
Bees do not use the information from the waggle dance to fly to nectar if it was placed in a boat in the middle of a lake (Gould).
This shows that Von Frisch’s account was incomplete.
Animal communication
The exchange of information between animals within the same species using a variety of signals
Functions of animal communication
Survival
Reproduction
Territory
Food
Survival as a a function of animal communication
Vervet monkeys use sounds to warn of danger. A specific sound warns other monkeys close by.
Rabbits use visual signals. They lift their tail high, pin ears back and leap forward to communicate danger to other rabbits.
These signals increase the survival of members of the signaller’s species.
Reproduction as a function of animal communication
Animals use mating displays.
Peacocks stretch their feathers like an umbrella to attract females. They communicate genetic fitness through brightly coloured and plentiful feathers.
Territory as a function affecting animal communication
Animals mark territory through spreading scents.
Rhinos produce 20–30 piles of dung to communicate that an area is occupied.
This has evolutionary value as it takes less energy than fighting.
Food as a function of animal communication
Animals use signals to show location of food.
Ants leave a pheromone trail to communicate the location of a food source.
Properties of human communication not present in animals
Planning ahead and discussing future events
Creativity
Single vs multiple channels
Plan ahead and discussing future events as a form of human communication
Humans can use their language to plan ahead and discuss future events.
animal communication focuses on things that are present such as predators
Language
A communication system unique to humans and consists of arbitrary conditional symbols through which meaning is conveyed
Eye contact
When two people look at each others eyes at the same time. It ha a number of roles in communication such as regulating the flow of a convo
Nonverbal communication
Enhancing info without words.
Eyes
Facial expressions
Body language
Verbal communication
The use of words as a way of expressing your thoughts and how you feel
Communication
The passing of info from one person to another
AO1 eye contact
Regulating flow of conversation Kendon found that speakers looked away when they were about to speak and gave prolonged eye contact when about to finish.
Shows eye contact encourages turn-taking in conversation.
Signalling attraction Conway et al. found that people who use eye contact are judged as more attractive even with a negative facial expression.
Expressing emotion Adams and Kleck found that participants judged emotions of joy and anger as more intense when shown a picture of someone gazing straight at them as opposed to gazing away.
They judged emotions of fear and sadness as more intense when the gaze in the picture was averted.
AO3 eye contact
Real-world application studies can explain an important feature of autism.
People with autism have difficulty communicating with others because they often do not use eye contact.
Knowing the importance of eye contact means that people with autism could be taught these skills.
the use of rating scales to make judgements.
Studies in this area rely on people rating their views of ‘attractiveness’ and ‘intensity of emotion’, and these are open to bias and interpretation.
This suggests that studies of eye contact may produce biased evidence.
Artificial studies studies of eye contact involve quite artificial tasks.
In Kendon’s study, participants were asked to get to know someone as part of the experiment.
This means the results may lack validity as they do not reflect what would happen in everyday life.
Body language
The way in which attitudes and feelings are communicated to others through unspoken movements and gestures
Closed posture
Arms and legs closed
The person is in disagreement to what is being said or possibly annoyed