Leadership Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

Leadership

A

Getting group members to achieve the group’s goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Great person theory

A

Perspective on leadership that attributes effective leadership to innate or acquired individual characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stogdill (1948, 1974): review 30 years research into leadership

A

No clear of the of individual differences

No specific leader characteristics to make one become a leader

But slightly more intelligent, self-confidence and aware of followers’ needs

This suggests there is a small component individual differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Judge, Bono, Ilies and Gerhardt (2002): meta-analysis

A

Using the big five model of personality to see if related to the leadership effectiveness and emergence

Extraversion was the most related and as the best predictors of effective leadership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trait approach is simplistic and lack consistent evidence

A

It appears to ignore the situational context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lewis, Lippitt, & White (1939): adult teachers leadership style on performance of school boys

Come up with three distinct leadership styles

A

Autocratic leader

Democratic leader

Laissez-fair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Autocratic leader

A

Leaders who use a style based on giving orders to followers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Democratic leader

A

More open to followers, take in their opinions, and obtain their agreement and consent

Most favourable and mostly successful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Laissez-fair

A

Disinterest in followers, followers can do whatever they want

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bales (1950): identified two key leadership roles

A

Task specialist

Socio-emotional specialist

No one can occupy both roles simultaneously

The person occupy the task specialist role was more likely to be the dominant leader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Task specialist

A

Tend to be centrally involved

Often by offering opinions and giving directions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Socio-emotional specialist

A

Tend to respond and pay attention to the feelings of other group members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sorrentino & Field (1986): conducted detailed observations of 12 problem-solving groups

A

Found people who can perform in the task and socio-emotional roles were more likely to be elected as leader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Contingency theory (Fiedler, 1964)

A

Leadership styles changes depending on the situation at any given time

Theories of leadership that consider the leadership effectiveness of particular behaviours or behavioural styles to be contingent to the nature of leadership situation

要變通

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fielder created a scale for leadership: least preferred co-worker scale (LPC)

A

Measuring leadership style in terms of favourability of attitude to words one’s least preferred co-worker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

LPC scale (least preferred co-worker scale)

A

High score = relationship orientated style, respondent felt favourably inclined to words and fellow member even feel they were not performing well

Low score = task orientated style, because the respondent was harsh on the poorly performing coworker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Three situational aspects to be considered

A

The quality leader-member relations

Task structure

Position power

18
Q

Making leadership easy

A

Good relations

with a clear task

and substantial position power

19
Q

Making leadership difficult

A

Poor relations

fuzzy task

Low position power

20
Q

Transactional leadership

A

Approach to leadership that focuses on the transaction of resources between leader and follower

External

No attitudes and beliefs change

21
Q

Hollander (1958): Idiosyncrasy credit

A

Leaders needed their followers to allow them to be innovative, to be able to experiment with new ideas and new direction - to be idiosyncratic

22
Q

Leader-member exchange theory (LMX)

A

the ability of the leader to develop good-quality personalised exchanges relationships with individual members

The quality of exchange relationships

23
Q

High quality LMX

A

Leader is supportive and encouraging which increases commitment

24
Q

Low quality of LMX

A

Fewer resources leads to dissatisfaction

25
Leaders should aim for high quality of LMX...
To ensure subordinates are productive and efficient by providing them the best resources
26
Transformational leadership
Focuses on the way that leaders transform group goals and actions mainly through the exercise of charisma Internal motivation Can lead to social change
27
3 keys components in transformational leadership
Individualised consideration (attention to followers needs) Intellectual stimulation (challenging followers basic thinking) Charismatic leadership (provides the energy)
28
Charismatic leadership
Leadership style based upon the leaders perceived possession of charisma Considered to be about changing direction, innovation and inspiration
29
Leader categorisation theory
Schemas about how different types of leader behave in different leadership situations When a leader is categorised as a particular types of leader, schema fills in details about how that leader will behave Cognitive information processing approach
30
Social categorisation theory suggest that individuals are motivated to reduce uncertainty by increasing consensus
Members are motivated to conform to group norms Group norms from the basics of prototype that how we should behave Prototypes are cognitively represent in terms of exemplars If the leader is prototypical -> they change the group norm (social influence) -> change in prototype in one way to another
32
Hogg’s analysis: integrates 2 notions
Leadership is relational - leaders and followers are interdependent roles which are embedded in a social system bound by a common group Leadership is a process of influence
33
Self-conceptualised (part of social identity process)
Depersonalisation leads to change in self stereotype
34
Leadership & social attraction
If the leader is prototypical, there will be perceived as attractive and influential It increases compliance and strengthened even more over time which known as the Snowball effect
35
Attribution theory: what drives behaviour
Personal force = dispositional attributions, behaviour is due to internal characteristics Environmental force = situation attribution which due to the requirements and the demands of the situation Create biases and apply to social cognition
36
Maintaining leadership
The longer the leader stay, the more we like The more consensual attraction will be, the most entrenched(堅固) the fundamental attribution error will become (anything bad is because of the environment) So the leader will become more entrenched and maybe able to define prototype more
37
Contextual changes
Overtime the prototype need to be redefined 1. Attenuate淡化and Excedrin relative prototypicality 2. Reject and derogate in-group deviants 3. Demonise a particular outgroup
38
Hogg et al. (198)
Chosen leaders were considered to be more significantly prototypical than other group members
39
Haslam & Platow (2001): how to get workers go extra mile
Leaders need to be: Transformational leadership: charisma
40
Non-prototypical leader do exist in the real world
Political leader
41
Rejection of deviants?
No because time changes and the deviants change their behaviour
42
Abrams et al. (2008): examined differences in evaluation of deviants
Anti-norm future leaders judged most positively and give an allowance to be innovative
43
Hogg (2011): Social identity theory of leadership
Development of social identity theory to explain leadership as an identity process in which in salient group prototypical leaders are more effective than less prototypical leaders Prototype defines the group and one’s identity as a group member