Social Identity Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

Social Identity and Self-categorisation Theories (Tajfel & Turner, 1986)

A

Personal self: unique information about you

Collective self: information about the groups to which you belong

The desire to feel positive about the in-group

Helps maintain self-esteem, meaning and understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Subjective Uncertainty Reduction Theory (Hogg & Abrams, 1993; Grieve & Hogg, 1999)

A

Uncertainty can be reduced by identifying with social groups

In-group bias as a function of categorisation and uncertainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Capturing (having) in-group identification: Leach et al. (2008)

A

Group level self-investment: solidarity with in-group members, satisfaction with the in-group, and centrality of in-group identification (SIT?)

Group level self-definition: individual self-stereotyping as an in-group member and perceptions of in-group homogeneity (SCT?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Excessive in-group identification: Ethnocentrism

A

Judging another culture based on preconceptions that are found in the values and standards of one’s own culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ethnocentrism: Main principles

A

Social categorization principle

Ingroup positivity principle

Ingroup comparison principle

Outgroup hostility principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social categorization principle

A

Human social groups are organized into discrete ingroup/outgroup categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ingroup positivity principle

A

Individuals value their ingroups positively and maintain positive, cooperative relationships with the members of the ingroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ingroup comparison principle

A

Ingroup attributes are evaluated as better than or superior to those of outgroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outgroup hostility principle

A

Relations between ingroup and outgroup are driven by antagonism, conflict, and mutual contempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nationalism

Kosterman & Feschbach, 1989

A

Idealisation

Superiority and dominance over other countries

The more the U.S. actively influences other countries, the better off these countries will be

The U.S. should not dominate other countries (rev)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Patriotism

Kosterman & Feschbach, 1989

A

Love and attachment to one’s country

Pride of one’s country
I have great love for my country

Every time I hear the national anthem, I feel strongly moved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Kosterman & Feschbach (1989): Other than nationalism & patriotism

A

internalisation

Civil liberties

World government

Smugness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

People who scored high in Nationalism

Kosterman & Feschbach (1989); Feschbach & White (1987)

A

Support for the Soviet Union is a wicked and immoral country

Support the nuclear freeze movement, rejection in stopping wars

Have more survivability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Benefits of excessive in-group identification: Brewer, 2003

A

In-group identification satisfies individual motives, for example:

Existential - seek comfort & scared of dead
Epistemic - learn more about the self
Relational - share contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Erich Fromm (1973): Group narcissism

A

It is extremely important as an element giving satisfaction to the members of the group and particularly to those who have few other reasons to feel proud and worthwhile

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Individual narcissism

A

Defensive type of self-esteem - lack of self-esteem

Characterized by a discrepancy between explicit and implicit self-esteem (Bosson et al., 2003; Jordan et al., 2003)

Linked to extreme emotional lability and anger (Emmons, 1987)

And aggressiveness (Baumeister, Bushman & Campbell, 2000

17
Q

Collective narcissism (CN)

A

Unrealistically positive image of the in-group contingent on external validation (they want everyone thinks that their group is the best)

18
Q

Collective Narcissism Scale

Golec de Zavala, Cichocka, Eidelson , & Jayawickreme, 2009

A

Capture the emtional, cognitive, potential and behavioural consequences

High score = high collective narcissism (my group is excellent and a lot better than the other groups)

19
Q

Implicit National Self-Esteem Test (based on Greenwald et al., 1998)

A

discrepancies in low and high implicit collective self-esteem (CSM) leads to a high private CSM

20
Q

Collective narcissism can arise the evaluation discrepancies that how people see their country

A

A way to get external validation, try to fix the bad stereotype they have inside (implicit)

21
Q

Antecedents of collective narcissism (Cichocka et al., 2015)

A

Political powerlessness and alienation

As they can do anything to fix the bad internal stereotype that they have

22
Q

Consequences of collective narcissism

A

Increased perceptions of threat

Support for military aggression

Inability to forgive out-group people

Hostility in response threat (retaliatory hostility)

Intergroup conspiracy beliefs

Government conspiracies

Prejudice

23
Q

Increased perceptions of threat

A

if people think they are the best, they can see the other as competitive, so they feel the threat

24
Q

Collective narcissism and retaliatory hostility (Golec de Zavala, Cichocka, & Iskra-Golec, 2011)

A

Collective narcissism and threat work together -> create out-group hostility

Only found high level of hostility when the in-group has been criticised by the out-group

25
Government conspiracies (Cichocka, Marchlewska, Golec de Zavala, & Olechowski, 2015)
High collective narcissism led people to have a stronger conspiracy beliefs in out-group conspiracies
26
Individual self-esteem
Secure self-esteem Narcissism self-esteem
27
Secure self-esteem
Genuine Well-based Adaptive self-esteem
28
Narcissism self-esteem
Exaggerated Discrepant Threatened Defensive self-esteem
29
Collective narcissism and in-group identification overlap
Without covariance will left with: Secure in-group identification Narcissistic in-group identification
30
Without covariance between CN & in-group identification
Narcissistic in-group identification -> more interpersonal aggressiveness Secure self-esteem -> less interpersonal aggressiveness
31
Collective narcissism vs. secure in-group positivity
National identification with no collective narcissism -> no impact on outgroup distance
32
By controlling the covariance
Secure in-group identification -> less likely to demonstrate prejudice and shut away from outgroup
33
If we can get rid of the discrepancies and collective narcissism
will lead to positive consequences of in-group positivity
34
Positive consequences of in-group positivity
Attributional generosity = greater respect for -outgroups