Lec 69: Introduction to Ethical Analysis Flashcards

1
Q

Traditional Approach

A

uses moral reasoning. Clinicians must recognize the ethical dilemma, assess this situation, decide what they want to do and then use several approaches to double check this decision.
7 steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Adujunctive Approach

A
  1. Casuistry
  2. Care Perspective
  3. Narrative Ethics
  4. Feminist (and Communitarian) Ethics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Casuistry

A

What other cases they know of in which the same ethical values are at stake?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Care Perspective

A

How will what they do affect their relationships with their patients?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Narrative Ethics

A

Is there more about the patient and persons like the patient that the care provider needs to know?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Feminist (and Communitarian) Ethics

A

Are there people involved but more “on the periphery” whose needs should be taken into account?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Traditional Approach Step 1

A

Recognize that a conflict exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Traditional Approach Step 2

A

Decide what additional data are needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Traditional Approach Step 3

A

Make the decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Traditional Approach Step 4

A

Test the consistency of the decision by comparing it with comparable situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Traditional Approach Step 5

A

Consider how this problem can be prevented in the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Traditional Approach Step 6

A

Review past experiences to check for biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Traditional Approach Step 7

A

Assess how the decision to be made could affect the patient/care provider relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Libertarian Model

A

Unfortunate, not unfair.

Neglect of history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Egalitarian

A

Veil of Ignorance.

Decent minimum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Utilitarian

A

Assessing values (maximize utility/benefits, minimize suffering/negatives)

17
Q

Balancing Approach

A

Balance utility and dignity

18
Q

Fourth Theory

A

Reduce pain (pain is an evil which leads to harm) since its perception provides the status of sentience (a moral status) to an organism.

19
Q

Fifth Theory

A

Relationships provide moral status (e.g. patient-physician, each patient interaction is unique and provides moral frame of reference).
Social reciprosity/relationships > strangers/outsiders
More social interaction = greater moral status (“Social Networks”)

20
Q

Norm

A
Prima Facie (impermissible) standard, e.g. don’t break it. Tabulated in guidelines.
Guideline 1: All sentient beings have level of moral status. Non-sentience = no moral status (e.g. anencephalic individuals).
Guideline 2: “competitive” in that mere sentience (e.g. fetus) = no moral status also
Case: Guideline 2 supports stem cell therapy if proven to work
Guideline 3: “Sentience (Theory 4) and cognition (Theory 2)” increase moral status
Guideline 4: “moral agency (T3) and human species properties (T1)” says if human has moral agency then they have equal basic rights, and vice versa.
Guideline 5: “Theory 4 and 5” shows that animals’ moral rights scale with potential for pain. If potential for pain increases then moral status also increases. (Pain proportional to moral status)
21
Q

Vulnerable populations

A

deserve more protection (unable to protect their own interests). E.g. elderly.
Outcome 1. Policy of full prohibition on activities involving such groups
Outcome 2. Allow practice without conditions (fully permissible)
Outcome 3. Conditional practice (partial permissibility)

Most studies utilize outcome 3, though this outcome may diminish benefit of research to such groups. Compromise: If certain groups cannot be treated equally then establish levels of risk/harm.

22
Q

Sympathy

A

concern for welfare, not preferential responsiveness.
Limited when bias/partiality affect reasoning of those distant and dissimilar (strangers) to us.
Hume  exercise “calm judgments” and be impartial