Lecture 10 Flashcards

1
Q

what is a good price for a product/service

Prices should not be

A

Too high: customers might stop buying your products

Too low: lost revenues/profits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a good price for a product/service

Economics

A

Inverse demand function: price as a function of quantity provided

(assumes perfect competition and price taking)
(how can a company know this (particularly, if products are heterogeneous))?

Firms deliver as long as price equals at least marginal costs
(what if companies can set prices)
(focus on short-term: what about recovering fixed costs)?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Determinants of price

A

Competition
Customers
Costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Determinants of price

Competition

A

High impact on markets and prices

Competitor prices can provide valuable info about their cost structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Determinants of prices: 3 Cs
Customers

A

Do products/services (quality) justify the price?
If not: they might switch to alternative products and/or providers

Transparency of prices (public or private knowledge)?

Dynamic pricing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Determinants of prices: 3 Cs

Costs

A

Role of the time horizon

Short: focus on incremental, variable costs

Long

Fixed costs become more important (full costs relevant: prices should cover unit costs)

Desire for price stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Target costing: market driven approach

A

What can we deliver given what customers are willing to pay for our product?

Price taker markets; little room to differentiate producs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Steps of target costing:

A

1) Determine customers expectations, wants and needs regarding a product
2) Determine customers willingness to pay: target price
3) Target price - target profit = target cost
4) Perform value engineering to achieve target cost

V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Value engineering

A

Systematic revision of the value chain to reduce costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Value engineering in target costing

A

Evaluating all aspects of the target product to reduce costs while satisfying customer needs: (eliminate non-value-adding costs
Reduce value-adding costs but do not sacrifice necessary quality or product properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Timing of costs

A

locked in costs

Cost incurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Locked in costs

A

Moment when decision is made to incur certain costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cost incurrence:

A

Moment when the costs are incurred (standard in costing systems)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cost plus pricing

A

Given costs, what price/profit do we target:

1) determine a cost base (full costs, absorption manufacturing costs, variable manufacturing costs, total variable costs)
2) Targeted mark-up in % (e.g. 10% on the full costs)
3) Selling price = costs + mark-up (e.g. price = 1.1 * full costs)

Risks: strong internal focus might lead to neglecting the markets reality

Ignoring the market might have detrimental consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cost plus pricing: ignoring the market

1: costs are too high

A

Customers are not willing to pay the price as the market offers competitive alternatives

Less goods than planned are sold

Unit base decreases -> higher full costs (unit costs) –< higher price -> even less units sold

Company gets pushed out of the market (number of units sold too low)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cost plus pricing: ignoring the market

2: prices too low

A

Price is lower than the market allows

More goods than planned are sold

unit base increases -> lower full costs (unit costs) -> Lower price -> even more units sold

Company gets sucked into the market

17
Q

Customer profitability analysis (I)

A

Similar to the profitability of products, you can assess the profitability of customers

What are costs/cost-drivers of retaining/gaining a certain customer

What are the (potential) gains from a certain customer

18
Q

Customer profitability analysis (I)
Isolating customer-specific costs/benefits

A

Feasibility depends on products/services and market

Examples for customer-specific costs:

Sales visits and meeting
Efficiency of the order process, contact time and (re)negotiations
Complaints and reclamations

19
Q

Customer profitability analysis (II)

A

Reactions based on the analysis:
Different price setting
Dropping of a customer

To consider:
What does dropping/annoying certain customers do to a companys general reputations?
What are positive externalities of this customer that I might miss in ny analysis?

How influential is a customer?

20
Q

Important features of decentralization decisions

A

Localized information, specialized skills

Need to be aligned with headquarters interests

Need to evaluate (performance of) decentralized units

Tools to manage decentralized units
-Targets and budgets
-Analysis of variances
-Transfer/internal prices

21
Q

Transfer prices (TP)

A

The amount charged by one segment of an organization for a product or service that it supplies to another segment of the same organization

22
Q

Profit (transfer pricing formula) dep 1

A

Profit = TP * Quantity - input costs

23
Q

Profit (transfer pricing formula) dep2

A

PQuantity - (TPQuantity) - other input costs

24
Q

Transfer prices: Functions

A

Coordinating (and transferring products and services between) departments

Performance evaluation of department and managers

Justification of the prices of products and services

Foundation for (external) accounting and taxation

25
Transfer prices: functions: Coordinating (and transferring products and services between) departments
Headquarters can influence decentral decisions via the TP and the approach to calculate it Changes in the TP lead to changes in internal demand and supply of products and services Profit maximization of one department might have negative effects on others or the whole company
26
Transfer prices: functions: Performance evaluation of department and managers
Based on department profit Contribution of different departments become visible Difficult to determine "correct" contribution in case of high interdependencies and synergies
27
Transfer prices: functions: Foundation for (external) accounting and taxation
While internal TP disappear when consolidating accounts, they can influence profits
28
Transfer pricing: implecation of using MC (benefits)
Optimal coordination in the interest of the company
29
Transfer pricing: Implecations of using MC disadvantages
If the production department has fixed costs, they will not be recovered To achieve optimal coordination, the production department will incur loss equal to its fixed costs Any decrease in variable costs (good management behavior) will result in low TP Coordination functions and performance evaluation functions may be in conflict Fairness perceptions
30
Transfer pricing features
Useful when market prices of products/services are not available or too costly to obtain MC: optimal coordination Alternatives to MC (Full costs, costs-plus): suboptimal coordination, but other benefits
31
Dual-pricing as a potential solution:
Different TP for selling and buying departments (the difference is accounted for at the centralized level)
32
Market based approach: works best when
There are competitive markets for very similar products Transaction costs at the market are negligible Market prices are stable: large fluctuations in prices makes management decisions harder high autonomy of departments
33
Manager behavior
If outside market exists and is easily usable: If TP < market price, the production dept would not sell internally IF TP> market price, the sales dept would not buy internally TP needs to equal the market price TP = market price leads to g ood manager decisions For the production department: incentives to reduce costs, no incentives to misreport costs Good coordination Easier performance evaluation High fairness perceptions
34
Negotiation based approach: TP determined by a negotiation process
Very decentralized approach: Departments with high autonomy Departments might arrive at very good/fair solutions
35
Potentially disadvantageous (negotiation based approach9
Time consuming Negotiation can be lead very strategically Perceptions of unfairness (e.g. from different bargaining powers, communication mode) Potential negative effects for performance evaluation Often, central intervention needed if parties fail to agree
36
Transfer prices can be a tool to optimize tax payments, but can sometimes be used illegally: arms length principle
TP between departments should be set as if departments would not be part of the same company
37
Tax considerations can be important for setting TP, but might clash with other TP functions (e.g. coordination)
38
(illegal) profit shifting with transfer prices
Very basic (iii) mechanism to move profits (away from a high-taxed country)