Lecture 2 Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Who’s model of memory ist he PL inovlved in ?

A

Baddeley and Hitch (1974)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two seperate sections of the phonological loop?

A

Phonological store and articulatory control process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the phonological store?

A

It can hold auditory information for about 2 seconds unless rehearsed. Items = registered as memory traces. limited capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the ACP?

A

Mechanism by which sub-vocal rehearsal of contents of the phonological store prevents decay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What explains the PL similarity effect?

A

Coding in the phonological store is down to how the word sounds (phonemes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Two examples of the phonological similarity effect?

A

Conrad & HUll, 1964 + Baddeley (1966). Similar = harder than distinct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What about articulatory suppression means that the PL may not be the only basis of digit span?

A

Even when suppressing, PPS can remember 4/5 visuall presented digits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stats for word length effect

A

90% for monosyllabic words, 50% for 5 syllables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who showed the word length effect and what did they show?

A

BAddeley et al (1975) - ST recall of words decreases as word length increases. Can remeber roughly as many words as you can say in 2 seconds –> no of syllables and reading speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Baddeley et al (2002) put the word length effect down to?

A

Both fogetting during rehearsal and the fact that longer words take longer to recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who put word lenggth effect down to forgetting during rehearsal and fact that longer words take longer to recall?

A

Baddeley et al (2002)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fact about children and sub-vocal rehearsal

A

Gathercole & Adams (1994) –> children may not use sub-vocal rehearsal until age 7 as articulation rate does not correlate with span before that age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the unattended speech effect?

A

Performance on span tasks is impaired if items are accompanied by other (unattended) verbal material

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Example of unattended speech effect

A

Colle & Welsh (1976) – immediate recall of digits is impaired if accompanied by German words even if instructed to ignore the words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is the meaning of irrelevant materials in unattended speech effect important?

A

No - Salame & Baddeley - one/tun –> effect on recall of digit sequences = same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What about pure tones and the unattended speech effect?

A

Jones et al (1993) - even pure tones will disrupt performance if they flucutate in pitch

17
Q

What hypothesis did Jones come up with regarding hte unattended speech effect

A

Jones et al 1993 – retention of serial order (verbal or visual) can be disrupted by irrelevant stimuli, provided they fluctuate over time

18
Q

What conclusions can we gain from the unattended speech effect?

A

Code is phonemic not semantic. Unattended phonological material gains access to PS and interferes with retention

19
Q

What does articulatory suppression abolish - which effects?

A

word length, phonological similarity and unattended speech effect

20
Q

What do the results of articulatory suppression tell us?

A

All of the abolished effects = based on PL

21
Q

What is articulatory suppression?

A

Baddeley 1984 - operation of looop = disturbed if overt or covert articulation of irrelevant ittems is performed

22
Q

What are the main functions of the PL?

A

Language acquisition and understanding syntactically complex sentences

23
Q

Example of PL being involved in learning new language?

A

Baddeley et al, 1988 –> Patient PV - very pure PL deficit. Could learn italian-italian words but not italian-russian words. Problem learning unfamiliar wrods not forming associations between two words

24
Q

Example of PL being invovled in learning unfamiliar words?

A

Gathercole & Baddeley (1990) –> children with low repitiion scores recall less phonologically familiar names than those with high scores. No signifciant difference on familiar names

25
Example of PL being involved in comprehension of sentences
Papagno et al, 2007 -- invesitgated causes of miscomprehension of sentences - direct involvement of PL in processing syntactically complex sentences
26
Example of someone who struggled with sentence comprehesnion due to PL deficit
Patient EA - Martin (1987) - little or no comprehension of full meaning of sentence - couldn't store
27
Two shortcomings of PL theory
No adequate explanation of how serial order is stored | No clear specification of the crucial processes involved in retrieval from the phonological store.