lecture 3 Flashcards
(27 cards)
Identity theory
Mental states =brain states
reductive materialism
All mental states can be explained in terms of physicalism.
why should we accept identitiy theory? (J.J.C Smart)
Ontologically simpler than substance dualism. (Identity theory covers substance dualism and easier to explain)
Identitiy theory vs Substance Dualism
1- There is no interaction problem because they are the same.
Identitiy theory vs Property Dualism
1- There is no epiphenomenalism problem because they are one and the same.
What is the other name for identitiy theory
psycho-neural reductionism
Arguments in favor of identitiy theory?
1-Phineas Gage (Localism&Specialization)
2-Type token identitiy
Localism&Specialization
Mental functions are performed by specific parts of the brain (one-to-one mapping)
Modularity
Brain areas perform the respective function independently form one another. ( Müller-Lyer illuson lines, cognitive and perception dont affect each other)
Type vs Token identitiy
Type: class (dog)
Token: specific (my dads dog)
Type identitiy theory
Every mental state of a specific type is identical to a specific type of brain state. (A person’s pain identical to a brain activity and remains the same for everyone’s)
Token identitiy theory
A particular instance of a mental state type is identical to a particular instance of a brain state type. (The certain type of pain i am feeling is identical to your pain but not to your brain state.)
Multile realizability
Lower levels of physical arrangement underlying a higher-level phenomena ( H2O relizes water)
How does multiple realizability challange type-Identity theory ?
1: Type identity theory is true
2: It can’t be true because same mental state can be realized by many brain states. ( me and you can have the same pain but realized by different brain states)
3- Octopus can also feel pain but realized by different mental state
Neural plasticity
1-One can feel pain differently as a kid and as an adult. (changes can be seen as intra-individual.)
Explanatory power
1- Challenges identity theory because doesn’t respond to the question of why is it the case that the same mental states that belong to different brain states are identical.
Globalism
a specific cognitive function can be best identified with activity in a widely distributed brain network
Connectivity
Replaces the idea of modularity ( different brain areas and functions are connected)
Multifunctionality
The same brain area is involved in multiple cognitive functions.
Many to Many mapping
1-The same brain area is involved in multiple tasks
2- the same task can be realized in different brain areas
3-Brain areas dynamically interact
Objection to Many to Many mapping
Some brain functions are processed in a single specialized and almost modular system. (Fusiform face area)
Correlation
In summer the likelihood of heat stroke as well as shark attacks increase.
(One doesn’t cause other they just have similar reasons)
Causation
In increasing the intensity of a heat stimuli, the experimenters could increase pain experience for the participants.
( the relation between two distinct stimuli.)
What’s the objection fro many to many maping?
Fusiform area: only specialized on one function.
- Just the example of fusiform area is not enough to prove that localisatin is a valid theory.