lecture 6 Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Social cognition

A

Mental processes to understand and interact with each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are different strategies to understand others?

A

1-Theory-Theory
2-Simulation theory
3- Direct perception (Interaction theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Theory- theory

A

Capacity to understand others relying on folk psychological theory.

Example: Every person looks like x will act like y. (Thirsty people seek to drink)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Epistemic strategy of theory theory

A

Cognitive strategies used to predict others’ behaviors based on law-like assumptions about connections between mental state and behaviors.
(questioning, hypothesis testing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do children learn in relationships to social cognition?

A

By observation, and through testing and errors. This is how folk psychology was found.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evidences that support Theory- Theory

A

1- Empirical evidence
2-Dennet’s critique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s the empirical evidence shown by the chimpanzee experiment

A

1- The chimpanzee sees a man struggling to reach a banana. When the chimpanzee is given multiple pictures of solutions he always chooses the correct one.

Result: The chimpanzee has a Theory of Mind. Recognizes that the videotape is a problem and comes up with a solution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dennet’s critique about Chimpanzee experiment?

A
  • It is unclear whether chimpanzee engages in the attribution of beliefs and desires.
  • The experiment is missing false-belief attribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

False-belief attribution?

A

the attribution of false beliefs to others that differ from one’s own beliefs.

(Sally has a basket experiment Theory of Mind)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is the evidence about false belief attribution convincing?

A

Objection Method: Maybe younger infants are capable of false belief understanding if we simplify the false belief test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Theories against Theory -Theory

A

Theory- theory assumes that internal mental states are only accessible due to complex inferences.

However, understanding others don’t always require such intellectual capacities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Simulation theory

A

We put ourselves into someonelses shoes. Information-poor mindreading where we don’t rely on folk psychology rather we rely on our own experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Epistemic strategy of Simulation theory

A

What would I think, feel or do if I would be that person in that situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Goldman’s simulation theory?

A

we create “pretend” beliefs and desires, feed them into our practical reasoning, and finally attribute a pretend outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evidence in favor of Simulation theory?

A

1-Mirror neurons: When you observe someone, your brain simulates what you’d do in their situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Objection to Mirror-neuron evidence?

A
  • Mirror neuron simulation is subconscious and doesn’t involve manipulating “pretend” mental states , understanding self/other, or any sort of inference
  • Mirror neurons only provide evidence for low-level simulation.
17
Q

High-Level simulation (Goldman)

A

Conscious use of imagination

18
Q

Low level simulation

A

automatic, unconscious matching process.

19
Q

Limitations of Simulation theory

A

-Requires complex cognitive abilities that can’t be ascribed to infants.

  • We are able to predict other’s behaviors even though we are quite different from each other.
  • We often complement others behaviors which allows for
20
Q

Main assumptions of interaction theory?

A

Our understanding of others emerges directly from interactions, not from theoretical inferences or simulations.

note: other 2 theories assume a third perspective stance while interaction. theory 2nd perpective.

21
Q

What is the Complexity of interaction theory?

A

understanding doesn’t always require complexity you can also interact and read social cues.

22
Q

epistemic strategy of interaction theory?

A

you can directly perceive the internal states of others displayed in their overt behavior.

23
Q

Evidence speaks in favor of Interaction theory?

A

Intersubjectivity:

1- Primary: early capacity to interact based on social cues. ( eye movement, detecting motor intention)(2 months)
2-Secondary: early capacities are more embedded interaction starts involving external object or event that become fcus in between people..9 months

3-Tertiary: the ethical stance of what is right and wrong, explicit attitudes about others’ mental states. 4 years

24
Q

Arguments against interaction theory?

A

1-Understanding people from other cultures
2-written comunication
3-absent person interaction
4-complex multi-layered interaction

25
What is Pluralism?
we rely on multiplicity of epistemic strategies when predicting, interpreting and reacting.
26
Advantages of Pluralism?
1- avoids the limitations of monist approach 2-accounts for the complexity and flexibility of human cognition
27
How do we employ different strategies?
1- How we employ these stratgeies differs from one culture to another. 2-The selection is shaped by our goals.