Lecture 3 Flashcards
(12 cards)
1
Q
Pragmatic (constructivist) theories of development
A
- Focuses on action
- Children are active learners
2
Q
Piaget’s main ideas = Genetic epistemology
A
- Interactionist between nature and nurture
- Pragmatist
- Cognitive development goes through series of set stages = universal
- Each stage characterised by different way of thinking about the world
- Motor actions –> abstract thought –> interaction with the environment
3
Q
Processes of cognitive development
A
- Equilibration = assimilation = Piaget says this is how development occurs
- Schema
- If info inconsistent with schema, it enters dis-equilibrium = accommodation (update and modify world view)
4
Q
Piaget’s stages of development
A
- Sensorimotor stage
2/3. Pre-operations and concrete operations
4.Formal operation stage
5
Q
First stage = sensorimotor stage
A
- Rougly age 0-2
- Lack of symbolic function, reliance of movement and sensation
- Between 5-7 months if object hidden, infant stops searching
- Between 8-9 months infants begin to search for hidden object
- A not B tast = test for object permanence:
- ->Hide object in box A, infant recognises object is missing and finds it in box A
- ->When repeated and object in box B, infant still looks in box A
- -8-12 months = Find objects in A but not B
- -12-18months = Seeks object in location B
- -18-24months = Flexible searching/locating
6
Q
Stage 2 and 3 = pre-operations and concrete operations
A
- Stage 2 = 2-7 years
- Stage 3 = 7-12 years
- Conservation = changes in appearance vs. alteration of reality (stage 3) e.g. conservation task like mass of dough
- Class inclusion = knowing objects belong to categories and can belong to more than one
- Transitive inference = use relationship between 2 variables to make prediction about a third variable
7
Q
Conservation errors
A
- Errors of concrete operations are due to:
- -> Egocentrism = world perceived in terms of self
- -> Centration = focus on one aspect of a situation/object
- -> Reversibility = inability to mentally reverse a series of actions/events
8
Q
Stage 4 = formal operation stage
A
- Adolescence
- Hypothetico-deductive reasoning at end point of cognitive development –> can reason about abstract ideas
- Pendulum problem:
- -> Adolescent given varying lengths of string and weights on pendulum device
- -> Have to work out how to make pendulum swing fastest
- -> Looked out how they approached the problem
- -> If reached FOS will vary variables systematically
-Task criticised = Dasen (1972) looked at task done outside of western world and low socio-economic groups –> task rarely passed so can’t be universal stage
9
Q
Criticisms of Piaget’s theory
A
- Theory was domain general but may be domain specific
- Development occurs in concepts of concepts that relate to specific area of cognition
- Evidence against domain general accounts = Goldschmid (1968) group of 6-7 year olds and gave range of conservation tasks = only moderately correlated with each other = each child performs differently on tasks
- Eval: Piaget responded by creating term horizontal declare = inconsistency in how children perform, but over time become consistent
10
Q
Criticisms of Piaget’s method -
Marovitch and Zelazo
A
- Marovitch and Zelazo:
- -> Meta analysis of A-not-B task on infants 7-47 months
- -> Found length of delay influences performance
- -> If you do more A tasks the child does worse on B task
- -> If distance between hiding location is narrow children do worse
- -> Criticises Piaget as he doesn’t take into account task related factors
11
Q
Criticisms of Piaget’s method - McGarrigle and Donaldson (1974)
A
- -> 2 conditions: 1st = adult knocks over coins and spreads them out. 2nd = naughty teddy bear spreads coins out
- -> Found when teddy responsible for change 63% of 5 year olds passed task where as when adult was responsible only 16% passed
- -> Shows extra linguistic features can influence interpretation
12
Q
Criticisms of Piaget’s method - Renee Baillargeon
A
- Argues shouldn’t use motor tasks as children skills are underdeveloped
- She developed object permanence test that involves just looking times
- Child watches draw bridge going back and forth
- Half children see draw bridge stop when draw bridge put in way
- Other half see draw bridge go through solid object
- Found they looked longer in second condition –> showing they don’t have object permanence