Lecture 3: The teenage brain Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

adolescence start

A

differs per person, it starts with puberty. it can start around 10-14, not tied to a specific age, but more to a set of biological changes.

puberty: biological marker
- pubertal hormones
- growth spurt
- circadian rythym (Before puberty, your body makes you sleepy around 8:00 or 9:00 pm. When puberty begins, this rhythm shifts a couple hours later. Now, your body tells you to go to sleep around 10:00 or 11:00 pm.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

end of puberty/adulthood =

A

less clear defined in biology, this is more cultural (drinking, driving, legal system)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

typical behaviour in adolescence

A

risky/impulsive behaviour: 200% increase in mortality rates (car crashes, binge drinking, unprotected sex, crime, substance use)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

mental health in adolescence

A

onset of a lot of psychiatric disorders, as well as drops in life satisfaction (after 20 it stays at that level, only increases at 60-70)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

even kijken naar grafieken in schrift life satisfaction, onset en complex moral reasoning development

A

ok

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

hoofdproces tijdens adolescentie

A

social reorientation:
- shift from parents to peers (easily embarrassed by parents and annoyed) -> you have to find your way between standing out and fitting in.
- different relationships with peers: the time you experience with romantic partners.
- transition to more advanced moral reasoning and increasing prosocial behaviours.

complex: more risky behaviour + social re-orientation + onset affective and clinical disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

For a long time, it was thought that the brain was mostly developed at age 10,
when it was at adult size. but not true

A

oke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

grey matter en white matter =

A

grey = nucleus/cell body, cortical thickness
white matter = myelin on axons, structural connectivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

grey matter brain development

A

use it or lose it!
1) synaptogenesis: after birth the neurons are in place, but still make many new connections
2) pruning: many of these new synapses will be eliminated -> experience based fine tuning of functional networks. this makes the network more efficient!

grey matter development happens first in the motor area, and higher cognitive functions develop later (PFC)

seeing/hearing - language - speech - higher cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

myelination, waarom?

A

Myelin increases the speed of the axon potential traveling down the axon, up to 100 fold compared to neurons that have no myelin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

development of myelin

A

here also first the more basic areas, later on the more complex ones (similar regional differences in development of white matter pathways). but in the pfc it remains increasing

myelination is relatiively experience-independent!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

prefrontal cortex shows the longest development

A

oke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

pubertal hormones

A

pass the blood-brain-barriere, impact dopamine (affective processing) and oxytocin (social motivation) in the brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

social environment impacts brain development

A

neurons have larger dendrites when they are in an enriched condition (tested with rats in boxed)

less SES leads to less grey matter -> thinner anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, striatum, hippocampus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social brain hypothesis

A

bigger relative size of the neocortex xorrelates with the size of the social group (largeer groups is larger brains!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

social information processing network: multiple systems

A
  1. cognitive control/self-regulation: PFC, latral parietal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex
  2. valuation/emotion/affect: amygdala, ventral striatum, ventro-medial PFC
  3. social cognition (take perspective, reflect): posterior STS, temporal parietal junction, medial PFC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what happens in adolescence according to the social information processing network

A
  • initially the valuation system gets sensitive, and the control system is linearly catching up.
  • the social orientation shifts from thinking about how others think of you in adolescence (MPFC) versus how you think about yourself in adulthood (TPJ)

sensitive period for social-affective processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

adolescence: more emotion than regulation

A

okee oke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

dual system model

A

motivational limbic system (hot) vs. prefrontal control system (cool)

zie schrift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

triadic model

A

PFC -> ventral striatum and amygdala

zie schrift

21
Q

reward sensitivity

A

more activity in the brain when you win something vs. when you lose. this responsivity to rewards increases during adolescence and decreases afterwards

22
Q

emotional control: go/no go task.

A

go bij neutral faces, dont go bij lachen.

teenagers make more mistakes with happy faces.

ventral striatum shows a peak in reactivity -> happy face is rewarding. with scared faces we see more activity as well in amygdala.

-> stronger emotional responses = less control (more mistakes)

23
Q

embarassment study

A

self-reported embarrassment peaks in adolescence

when a camera is focused on you -> more embarassment in adolescents. MRI scanner show increases MPFC -> increased self-directed thought.

early adolescence: increased self-directed thought and embarrasment

24
Q

social evaluation task

A

the predicted acceptance from others decreases during adolescence, at 13-14 even below 50/50.

25
social evaluation task: cyberball
online game, toss a ball. eventually you are excluded from the bot -> social exclusion. only adolescents show a significant decrease in mood after this ostracism. mPFC is activated again (social brain region)
26
... activity in the mpfc predicts ... resistance to peers
more activity in the mpfc predicts less resistance to peers this relationship is not present in adults
27
the more adolescents you put in a car, the more likely there is an accident
adolescents taking risks often happens in the presence of peers
28
stoplight game
drive on a road, try to get there as fast as possible. stop for light. if you take a risk you could get into an accident -> if peers play together, more risky and more crashes. bij adults juist minder kans op crashes als er peers bij zijn. -> ventral striatum activity increases (maybe more rewarding?) -> balance impulse control is then shifted
29
... activity in the striatum means .... resistant to peer influences
more activity in the striatum means less resistant to peer influences
30
body image paradigm
judge whether the shown body would be considered normal or not normal. later they would see what others said about that. if there was a prediction error, people with low self esteem would correlate with more activity in the right insula (processing internal feelings, especially discomfort, uncertainty, and self-awareness) -> So, when someone with low self-esteem realizes they disagreed with others (i.e., made a "mistake"), their brain shows heightened sensitivity in that area. This might reflect feeling anxious, judged, or self-conscious. -> low self esteem is more sensitive to social disagreement
31
instagram paradigm
teens could just like whatever they wanted. - amount of likes: more likely to like a photo - normal vs. risky behaviour: Adolescents were more likely to like a photo, even one portraying risky behaviors, such as smoking marijuana or drinking alcohol, if that photo had received more likes from peers.
32
prosocial behaviour=
actions, such as sharing, helping, or comforting, that are intended to benefit other people
33
if they know a peer is a risk taker...
they will show more risk taking behavior. if they know a peer is not a risk taker, they will not
34
3 things that lead to increased prosocial behaviour
- increased empathic concern - advanced perspective taking (meer cognitief) - cognitive control (need to regulate/suppress impulses to be nice)
35
pain matrix is activated when...
- experiencing pain - observing other in pain - when harm is intentionally inflicted: also social brain regions -> PAG, SMA, aMCC
36
pain matrix differences adolescents and adults
* Adolescents show more activation in the affective brain regions * Adults show more activity in the prefrontal regulatory brain regions. -> adults are better at down-regulating their emotional responses (better for helping someone)
37
social perspective taking
the ability to infer others' thoughts, intentions, motives and attitudes
38
role taking=
the ability to assume another persons perspective and understand their intentions, thoughts, feelings and behaviour
39
selmans five levels of perspective taking
0. egocentric or undifferentiated perspective (3-6 yrs) 1. social-informational role taking (6-8 yrs) 2. self-reflective role taking (8-10 yrs) 3. mutual role taking (10-12 yrs) 4. societal role taking (12-15 yrs and older)
40
ultimatum game
proposer makes a proposal to the responder about how they will divide 10 euros. responder can accept or decline
41
inequity aversion
the more the equality of the offer declines, the more people will reject the offer. they rather have nothing! they therefore also think about others. this relativity is also present in monkeys: give one a cucumber and the other raisins: they will get mad. -> requires perspective taking.
42
the role of intentions
compare when there is a fair alternative, versus when there is not. - kids still reject the unfair alternative, even when the other person had no choice - adults reject these offers less when they know the other person had no choice -> intentions become more important with age
43
waar zie je perspective taking in the brain
TPJ activity (temporoparietal junction), increases with age. Brain activity TPJ mediates age related changes in rejection rates. -> suggests that perspective-taking indeed plays a crucial role in changes in behavior
44
DLPFC activity increases as well, showing...
more regulation
45
social reinforcement learning
- 3 kids faces with different rates (continuous, frequent, rare) - press the button when you see a face. if you do it within 2 seconds you get positiv or negative feedback. - you have to learn who is nice and who is not nice
46
formule betekenis van de dingen
V is expectation of positive feedback. (between 0-100%) V t+1 is the expectation on the next trial (after receiving feedback) delta is the prediction error (what did I expect – what did I get) a is the learning rate (how much do I change my expectations). V predicts Reaction Times to stimulus, faster for higher V
47
resultaten van die formule: social reinforcement learning
- vaak 2 verschillende learning rates voor positief en negatieve dingen - voor negatieve dingen zijn mensen meer gevoelig: change beliefs more - the higher the V, the higher the response time - Adolescents don’t really change their beliefs after positive feedback! (a is low, deelta is activated when there is a prediction error) -> may be because they dont really belief that others like them -> are more sceptical -> do less with positive feedback
48
Putamen active when receiving positive social feed-back regardless of the expected outcome. Graph suggesting that peer approval may motivate adolescents toward action (but not change in beliefs!).
oke
49
emotional go/no go task
Adolescents show: Increased amygdala activity to emotional faces, especially threatening (e.g., angry faces). Less effective recruitment of the ventromedial PFC (vmPFC) and lateral PFC during inhibitory control, especially in emotionally charged situations. In emotionally neutral contexts, inhibitory control improves — suggesting emotional input disrupts control. The Dual Systems Model would attribute adolescent impulsivity mostly to: Overactive limbic response (e.g., amygdala), Underdeveloped PFC control. BUT: The Emotional Go/No-Go study shows something more nuanced: The amygdala (emotion system) is hyperactive. The vmPFC (interface between emotion and control) fails to regulate amygdala activity effectively. This isn't just an issue of "strong emotion vs. weak control" — it’s about interaction failure among three components: Amygdala: detects emotional salience. vmPFC: integrates emotional input and modulates control. lateral PFC: executes cognitive control (inhibition). This tripartite dynamic fits the Triadic Model better.