Lecture 4: Social relationships Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

developmental changes in adolescence

A
  • Increasing interest in other-sex relationships
  • Peer group as reference group (sense of identity)
  • Definition of peers: from shared outside activities to shared mindsets/attitude (from playmates to self-disclosing soul mates)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Friendships become more stable with age

A

oke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

verschillende relaties

A
  • Peers: people who have aspects in common (e.g., status, age within a context)
  • Friends: valued, mutual relationship
  • Clique: a small group of friends, regular social group
  • Crowds: larger, reputationally based group. Share similar norms, interests and values but are not necessarily friends
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

wat zijn de functies van dating relationships

A

achieve autonomy, gain status, distance from family members, but also emotional risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

friendship associated feelings

A
  • Preference for friends above family
  • But it may differ dependent on topic
  • trust and confide in parents -> bv. academic topics
  • trust and confide in friends -> sexuality
  • Feel good when with friends
  • Mirrors own feeling, understanding
  • Feeling of freedom and openness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

cultural differences in friendships

A

generally more focus towards peers than family. but less in traditional cultures compared to western cultures.

bv. adolescenten uit indonesie raten hun family hoger op companionship and enjoyment dan peers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

intimacy=

A
  • Degree to which two people share personal knowledge, thoughts and feelings
  • Intensifying need in early adolescence (= steeds meer nodig in de adolescentie)
  • Due to cognitive capability -> perspective taking and empathy
  • Truly caring instead of ‘play mates’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

door intimiteit….

A
  • meer perspective taking
  • meer persoonlijke kennis (sex, self-disclosure, emotional labelling)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

dus relatie tussen intimiteit en perspective taking

A

reciprocal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

adolescentie redenen voor liefdes relaties

A
  • recreatie
  • intimiteit
  • status
  • leren
  • companionship
  • courtship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

dating scripts

A

cognitive models that direct relationships.
- proactive: generally more male
- reactive: generally more female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

romantic relationships

A
  • more intense emotions (positive: love, happiness, and negative: anxiety, discomfort)
  • sexual activity
  • being cared for
  • social companion in leisure activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sternbergs theory of love

A
  • passie: sexual desire, attraction
  • intimiteit: closeness, communication
  • commitment: staying even though there are fluctuations

alleen passie = infatuation
alleen intimacy = liking
alleen commitment = empty love

P + I = romantic love
C + I = companionate
P + C = fatuous love (silly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

abuse relationships dont start out abuse, they start exciting, with a rush, it feels really good. it can shift to overwhelming or entrapment.

A

het gaat dus om hoe het verder ontwikkelt. are you comfortable and respected?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

a factor showing unhealthy love

A

isolation; when you are pulled away by friends and family. healthy love is about independence! (over time, at first this is normal)
after the honeymoon phase: jealousy, cheating accusations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

volitility:

A

high highs, low lows. stress, hateful comments and apologies. saying they may get depressed when you breakup.

17
Q

adolescence: wat voor liefde meestal?

A

infatuation and romantic love (no commitment or empty love, dit komt later)

18
Q

coercion of dwang:

A

relationship dissatisfaction, instability, intimate partner violence

19
Q

wat is de relatie met parents en latere relaties

A

Disruptive parenting -> antisocial behaviors & deviancy training -> coercion intimate adult relationship 15 years later

20
Q

reciprocal influences between peers and the adolescent

A

adolescent characteristics influence the choice of friends <-> friends influence the characteristics of the adolescent

21
Q

peer/friend pressure

A
  • directly and indirectly
  • substantial influence due to norms, social learning
  • can be positive (support, wellbeign, prosocial behaviours) or negative (risk-taking, substance use, mental health problems)
22
Q

risk taking in the presence of peers experiment

A
  • Drive simulator game
  • DV: when do participants stop in risky situation (e.g., crossing intersection when traffic lights turn yellow or not)
  • Driving = more points but risk of crashing
  • Stopping = less points but safe
  • IV1: age group
  • IV2: presence of peers vs. playing alone

results: adolescents drive more risky in groups. this is less apparent for young adults, and not present in adults (they drive safer)

23
Q

why do we use digital media

A

powerful driver for maintaining social connectedness. we learn, get to know each other, socialize, get information… most people have ambivalent relationships with the smartphone. we need to find a digital balance. how we use them matters the most!

however, in adolescents vulnerable period: influence of peers and relatively low self-regulation

24
Q

problematic smarthphone use=

A

verslaving (withdrawal, others notice its influences on your life)

25
the type of use is important
- passive use: scrolling, checking messages - active use: sending pictures, sending messages -> passive use is associated with worse emotional outcomes. passive use -> problematic use -> passive use (it is a vicious cycle!) active use -> more often offline and present in real life. balance is the most important, active > passive.
26
argumenten tegen deze slechte invloed van sociale media
- jonathan heidt: based on correlation. the suggestion that digital technologies are rewiring our children’s brains and causing an epidemic of mental illness is not supported by science!!!! - when adolescents feel unhappy, they scroll more. - platform specific associations with well-being, self-esteem, and friendship closeness (+whatsapp and snapchat, - tiktok, instagram, youtube)
27
cyberbullying =
an aggressive, intentional act or behavior carried out by a group or an individual, using electronic forms of contact, repeatedly and over time, against a recipient who is unable to easily defend him/herself -> adolescents do not have good strategies to deal with this
28
Adolescents who engage in traditional bullying are more likely to also engage in cyberbullying
oke
29
prevalence rates of cyberbullying =
23-54% (van mensen die het wel eens ervaren hebben!!)
30
hoe ontwikkelt self-regulatie
- co-regulated in infancy - independent yet socially calibrated in adolescence - there are age-related transitions in the capacities, goals and motivation employed for self-regulation
31
what is the function of bullying
adolescent bullying and aggression can be adaptive and goal-directed (gaining status, preventing losing status)
32
dus de relatie tussen sociale media en wellbeing
- increased risk for substance use disorder, high anxiety (social comparison, low self-esteem, cyberbullying) and feelings of loneliness, depression and stress. - but, also: engagement in healthy online activities may reducee the risk of mental health issues and SUD, may increase self-esteem and social connection, and causality is unclear! associations over time show that youth who already have mental health problems use such platforms more often or in different ways than peers
33
welke biologische verklaringen zijn er voor de kracht van sociale media op adolescenten
* Sensitive period for social interactions and judgment * Subcortical areas related to affective properties * Dopaminergic systems and striatum are potential mechanisms of action for risk behavior and social reinforcement * But also the cognitive system and motivation! Adolescents use cognitive abilities flexibly, based on social-affectivee involvement, and the role of hormones in puberty. The brain therefore reacts differently depending on the situation
34
results of study sherman, testing likes and peer pressure on instagram
Popularity of photo had effect on reaction to photos: * Behavior: more likes, if photo was liked more (regardless of type of photo, but especially own photo was liked) * Neural level: more brain activity for photos with more likes (regardless of type of photo), areas related to social cognition and reward * Risky photos: activation in cognitive-control network decreased -> Simple example of socio-cultural learning: a like is like a social cue related to the cultural sphere of adolescents. they use these cues to learn to interact with the world. This can be adaptive, but also maladaptive: the cognitive control areas were less active during risky pictures compared to neutral pictures -> leads to adoption of this risky behaviour.
35
more likes -> zelf ook liken + meer brein activiteit -> socio-cultural learning
oke
36