Lecture 5: Mild Cognitive Impairment & Subjective Cognitive Decline Flashcards
(46 cards)
Mild Cognitive Impairment & Subjective Cognitive Decline:
- Which is considered part of normal ageing and which is considered part of abnormal ageing?
Mild Cognitive Impairment: part of abnormal cognitive ageing Subjective Cognitive Decline: part of normal ageing
Overview of possible cognitive age-related concerns:

Subjective Cognitive Decline
SCD (Jessen er al. 2014) :
- Older adults complain about perceived decline in cognitive abilities
- Within normal limits standard neuropsychological or other clinical measures
- No impairments IADL (Instruments Activity of Daily Living)
Criteria for diagnosis (for SCD):
- Decline relative to prior levels (subjective decline)
- Decline not due to psychiatric or other conditions, medicattion, substance use (reversable causes)
(for a long time they were referred to as the “worried well” and it was thought that there is nothing wrong with them)
Subjective Cognitive Decline (consequences)
- increased risk developing MCI and AD
- Rates vary: 5 – 50%
- Meta-analysis (Mitchell et al., 2014):
- adults SCD twice as likely (10.9%) to develop dementia than without SCD over 4 year period
- Higher frequencies AD biomarkers (“SCD plus”)
- Volume loss hippocampus, medial temporal areas
- Amyloid plaques
- Evidence mixed
- in SCD “plus” the “plus” refers to the presence of biomarkers
Differential diagnosis (SCD vs MCI or dementia):
- Formal neuropsychological assessment (simple because SCD is - contrary to MCI and dementia - defined as being in the limits of normal ageing by neuropsychological assessments)
Differential diagnosis, SCD vs normal ageing:
- Lack objective measures SCD (can’t use neuropsychological tests)
- Differentiation based on self report
- No SCD typical complaint of cogntive domain
- Concern/worry more sensitive as indicator SCD
- Increased risk conversion dementia
- Other etiologies (e.g. depression, chronic medical conditions)
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI):
- decline in cognitive performance greater than expected from person’s age, not sufficient to warrant diagnosis dementia.
- MCI is stage between normal cognition and dementia
- MCI: pathological condition, not part of normal ageing
- MCI: stage between normal cognition and dementia in terms of severity and progression
- however, it does not necessarily lead to dementia, some also return to normal functioning

Mild cognitive impairment, Diagnosis.
Original criteria Petersen (1999), Mayo criteria:
Original criteria Petersen (1999), Mayo criteria:
- subjective complaint memory impairment
- objective evidence of memory deficit (disctinction to SCD)
- 1.5. SD below norm on 20 min. delayed recall story A of WMS Logical Memory task
- overall cognitive functions preserved (MMSE >= 24)
- intact activities of daily life (global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale of 0.5)
- absence of dementia (consensus diagnosis)
These criteria were strict and limited to memory.
Mild cognitive impairment, Revised criteria for Diagnosis.
NIA-Alz Association task force for MCI (Albert et al. 2011):
- Concern about change in cognition.
- Change larger than expected from person’s age, education
- Evidence impairment one or more cognitive domains
- no longer memory only
- 1 - 2 SDs below mean
- Preservation independence in daily functioning
- or only mild difficulties
- Not demented
- impairments and mild difficulties IADL not severe enough interfere with social or occupational functioning
- MCI as diagnosis (associated with dementia pathology)
- Not description of current functioning
- MCI is a condition\diagnosis based on functioning but not just a description of the degree of functioning
- Overlap criteria for minor neurocognitive impairment DSM 5.
- DSM also requires that changes not due to delirium or Axis 1 disorders (depression, schizophrenia).
Mild cognitive impairment, Revised criteria.
Overlap with other diagnoses or pathologies:
- Overlap criteria for minor neurocognitive impairment DSM 5.
- DSM also requires that changes not due to delirium or Axis 1 disorders (depression, schizophrenia).
- Overlap “cognitive impairment no dementia”(CIND)
- Label first used in Canadian epidemiological studies
- CIND – any cognitive disorder (not only memory) from various possible causes, including drug use, alcohol abuse, psychiatric illness, degenerative illness.
- MCI more specific than CIND
Mild cognitive impairment, revised criteria.
Various causes for cognitive impairment:
- Some causes may be reversible
- Persons diagnosed with MCI can revert to normal function
- depending on what the cause is MCI might be reversible to normal functioning or not

Mild cognitive impairment.
Petersen (2004): 4 main etiologies for MCI:
- Degenerative (e.g. AD)
- Vascular (e.g. cerebrovascular disease)
- Psychiatric (e.g. depression)
- Traumatic (e.g. head injury)
Other causes are possible (e.g. drug effects, thyroid dysfunction, B12 deficiency).
- 1 & 2: MCI possibly pre-stage of dementia
- but if due to 3. or 4. (psychiatric or traumatic reasons) it is well ossible that a person returns to normal functioning after the cause is treated/healed.
Types of MCI
- Depending on cognitive domains affected
- amnestic MCI (aMCI) – memory impaired, other domains spared
- nonamnestic MCI (naMCI) – memory spared, other domains impaired (e.g. executive function, language),
- Single domain or multiple domains (distinction)
- One (SD - single domain) or more than one cognitive domain/function (MD - multiple domain) impaired.
Cognitive impairments in MCI
Example study about Memory
(Rabin et al., 2009)
MCI group, impaired on range of verbal and visual memory tests – aMCI
- notice that on all different memory tasks the MCI group performs worse than healthy controls
Cognitive impairments in MCI
Example study of memory and other cognitive functions.
(Grundman et al., 2004)
MCI group impaired on memory, EF, speed and language tests
- multiple functions can be impaired

Cognitive impairments in MCI
Example study: single or multiple domains
(Brandt et al., 2009)
- some of subgroups are only impaired on a single domain (e.g. memory)
- others don’t have imapirments of memory but on different other domains (EF, etc.)

Prevalence of MCI
- Uncertainty prevalence MCI
- Wide variation between studies (3% - 54%)
- partly due to diagnostic methods used and populations sampled
Reasons for different estimates of the prevalence of MCI:
- populations sampled:
* Prevalence higher in clinical samples (persons with memory or other cognitive complaints) than in population samples - different diagnostic criteria used
- Criteria to define impairments more strict – lower prevalence
- Criteria to define impairments less strict – higher prevalence
- different diagnostic methods used
- More cognitive domains assessed, more sensitive tests:
- more likely to find cognitive impairments due to chance (higher prevalence MCI)
Prevalence of MCI
Large population studies in US and other countries:
- MCI prevalence elderly persons (70 and older) without dementia: 16% (Petersen et al., 2010), 18.8% (Lopez et al. 2003), 16.3% (Michaud et al., 2017)
- Prevalence found in these large studies were fairly similar
- Similar prevalence rates in Sweden, Germany, Canada
- MCI prevalence estimated 9 - 20% of elderly population (Smith & Bondi, 2013)
- Higher in clinical samples
Prevalence of MCI regarding age and gender
From: Petersen et al (2010)
- increases with age
- higher in men

Prevalence of MCI regarding education:
From: Petersen et al (2010)
- lower prevalence with more years of education
- true among men and women

Prevalence of MCI regarding amnestic vs non-amnestic MCI and Single vs. multiple domain categories:
From: Petersen et al (2010)
- MCI with memory impairments most prevalent
- Prevalence amnestic MCI higher than non-amnestic MCI (SD and MD).
- least prevalent is the non-amnestic, multi-domain MCI

Brain changes in MCI
- Structural - volume
Jack et al. (2000)
- Volume hippocampus in MCI (amnestic MCI) < healthy older adults > AD
- 2 – 4 year follow-up: more reduction volume hippocampus MCI than healthy older adults
- less reduction than in AD (but NS)
- 2 – 4 year follow-up: less reduction volume hippocampus in MCI who maintained baseline cognitive performance (MMSE, Dementia Ratings Scale) than decliners
So, rate of reduction in volume was higher in MCI group compared to control but lower compared to AD group.

Mild cognitive impairment
Structural brain changes - volume
- Chang et al (2010) – classification HC or MCI based on performance Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test – learning and retention scores
- MCI subgroups low on learning (LL HR ≈ acquisition) or retention (HL LR ≈ delayed recall) of both (LL LR)
- More volume reduction in all MCI groups compared to HC
- Volume reduction mainly in temporal and frontal areas (like in normal ageing)
- Extent volume reduction larger in MCI subgroup impaired in both learning and retention (LL LR) than other subgroups










