Lecture 8 Flashcards Preview

Foundations of Catholicism > Lecture 8 > Flashcards

Flashcards in Lecture 8 Deck (33)
Loading flashcards...
1
Q

(553) Council

Two Physeis in one divine Hypostasis

A

Constantinople II

2
Q

(7th century)
Because Christ is divine, he could not sin. He always was in line with Father. Not possible to do this with human will (Jesus only had divine will)

*refuted by Maximus the Confessor and Constantinople III

A

Monothelitism

3
Q

(580-662)

  • refuted Monothelitism
  • Distinction between human will into Natural and Gnomic wills
A

St. Maximus the Confessor

4
Q
  • Free movement toward perfection of one’s nature
  • Necessary for human nature (separates us from animals), so Christ must have had one
  • Always in harmony with God’s will
A

Natural Will

5
Q
  • Ability to make choice between real goods and apparent/false goods (salad vs junk food)
  • Makes sin possible
  • Only human hypostasis has one–Jesus does not
A

Gnomic Will

6
Q

(680-681)

Council that condemned Monothelitism

A

Constantinople III

7
Q

“image smashers”

  • Did not think image of Christ/saints could be used in worship
  • Denies Incarnation in a way
A

Iconoclasm

8
Q

(675?-749)

  • Refuted Iconoclasm
  • Because God became visible as a human, we can have an image of Christ which is an image of God. Saints are united with Christ, so we can see Christ through them
A

John Damascene

9
Q

Council that refuted Iconoclasm

A

Nicea II

10
Q

Constantinople I, II, & III
Nicea I & II
Council of Chalcedon
Council of Ephesus

A

Councils before split in Church

11
Q

“gift”

A

Grace

12
Q

gift of union with God with forgiveness of sins

A

Theological meaning of grace

13
Q

God and Holy Spirit present within us

A

Uncreated grace

14
Q

Effects on us brought about by the presence of Holy Spirit

A

Created grace

15
Q

Points out shift from uncreated to created grace and wants renewed emphasis on uncreated

A

Carl Rahner

16
Q

Points out while we should be aware of uncreated grace, we should not downplay created grace. Both rely on each other to be important

A

Henri de Lubac

17
Q

<p>Started belief that we can redeem ourselves without grace</p>

A

<p>Pelagius</p>

18
Q
  • even after first sin, we are still able to save ourselves through freedom alone
  • refuted by Augustine and Church
A

Pelagianism

19
Q

(late 1500s)
controversy about how grace helps us
Dominicans vs Jesuits

A

Controversy de Auxiliis

20
Q

<p>1. when we do good, grace somehow compels freedom so we couldn't have done it otherwise 2. sufficient grace vs. efficacious grace 3. God's choice to give efficacious grace Accused of Janeism</p>

A

<p>Dominicans</p>

21
Q

<p>1. When we do good, we freely choose to do so &amp; cooperate with grace, but could have gone against grace &amp; done evil 2. When we do we evil, we choose not to cooperate with grace 3. God foresees peoples participation with grace Accuse Pelaganism</p>

A

<p>Jesuits</p>

22
Q

As a result of fall, human nature is hopelessly damaged

*similar to Calvinism

A

Jansenism

23
Q

Isn’t enough to overcome sin, so we still end up sinning

*Dominican idea

A

Sufficient Grace

24
Q

Is enough to enable us to do good, so we will do it

A

Efficacious Grace

25
Q

Ordered D&Js in Controversy de Auxiliis to end argument. Starts commission that failed

A

Pope Clement VIII

26
Q

1607 - ordered sides to stop attacking; didn’t work

1611 - ordered end to debate. Said papal announcement would come but never did

A

Pope Paul V

27
Q

(1468-1534)

*Says Aquinas does not say there would be desire for union with God without grace

A

Cajetan

28
Q

(1877-1964)

Aquinas view is in state of pure nature; no desire for union with God without grace

A

Reginald Garrigou-Lugrange

29
Q

Leader of movement “Ressoucement”

*If read carefully, he still says Aquinas thinks we would desire heaven without grace

A

Henri de Lubac

30
Q

“Going back to the source”

A

Ressoucement

31
Q

Even if without grace we desired heaven, then if God desired not to give us grace he would be doing us an injustice. Which means it would not be a free gift because God owes us grace

A

Cajetan & Reginald Garrigou-Lugrange’s view

32
Q

Constantinople II

A

(553) Council

Two Physeis in one divine Hypostasis

33
Q

Monothelitism

A

(7th century)
Because Christ is divine, he could not sin. He always was in line with Father. Not possible to do this with human will (Jesus only had divine will)

*refuted by Maximus the Confessor and Constantinople III