Lesson 1.1: Writing a Reaction paper, a Review, and a Critique Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

are specialized forms of writing in which a reviewer or reader evaluates

A

reaction paper, review, critique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

examples of works that can be evaluated:

A
  • a scholarly work
  • work of art (play, dance, performance art, sports, film, exhibits)
  • designs (industrial, fashion, furniture)
  • graphic designs (poster, billboard, commercial, digital media)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

range in length of reaction papers?

A

200-750 words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

true or false

they are advanced form of writing that requires critical thinking skills and recognizing arguments

A

true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the belief that people only do things to help themselves, rather than for good or sincere reasons

A

cynicism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

a feeling that bad things will happen and that something will not be successful

A

pessimism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

true or false

Reviewers rely on opinions

A

False

rather, they use both proof and logical reasoning to substantiate their comments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

They process ideas and theories, revisit and extend ideas in a specific field of study, and present an analytical response to a scholarly, literary, or artistic art work.

A

Reaction Papers, Reviews, and Critiques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

true or false

You can critique a material based on its technical aspects, its approach to gender, your reaction as the audience, or through its portrayal of class struggle and social structure.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

10 CRITICAL APPROACHES in WRITING a CRITIQUE:

A
  1. Formalist
  2. Feminist
  3. Reader-Response
  4. Marxist
  5. Historical
  6. Inter-textual
  7. Deconstructionist
  8. Mimetic
  9. Archetypal
  10. Psychological
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Claims that literary works contain intrinsic properties and treats each work as a distinct work of art. It posts that the key to understanding a text is through the text itself.

A

formalist criticism or formalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

true or false

Formalism is placed at the center because it deals primarily with the text and not with any of the outside considerations such as author, the real world, audience, or other literature

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

True or False

In Formalism, the historical context, the author, or any other external contexts are necessary in interpreting the meaning.

A

False

it is not necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Author’s techniques in resolving contradictions within the work

A

Formalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Central passage that sums up the entirety of the work

A

Formalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Contribution of parts and the work as a whole to its aesthetic quality

17
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Contribution of rhyme and rhythm to the meaning or effect of the work

18
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Relationship of the form and the content

19
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Use of imagery to develop the symbols used in the work

20
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Interconnectedness of various parts of the work

21
Q

CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects)

Paradox, ambiguity, and irony in the work

22
Q

Unity in the work

23
Q

Focuses on how literature presents women as subjects of socio-political, psychological, and economic oppression

A

Feminist Criticism or Feminism

24
Q

True or False

Feminism also reveals how aspects of our culture are
patriarchal (i.e. how our culture views men as superior and women as inferior).

25
# CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects) How culture determines gender and how gender equality is presented in the text
Feminism
26
concerned with the reviewer’s reaction as an audience of a work
Reader Response Criticism
27
# True or False READER RESPONSE CRITICISM claims that the reader’s role can be separated from the understanding of the work;
False | a text does not have meaning until the reader reads and interprets it
28
# CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects) ✓ Interaction between the reader and the text in creating meaning ✓ The impact of readers’ delivery of sounds and visuals on enhancing and changing meaning
READER RESPONSE CRITICISM
29
Concerned with differences between economic classes and implications of a capitalist system, such as the continuing conflicts between the working class and the elite.
MARXIST CRITICISM
30
It attempts to reveal that the ultimate source of people’s experience is the socioeconomic system.
MARXIST CRITICISM
31
# CRITICAL APPROACHES IN WRITING A CRITIQUE (look into the ff aspects) ✓ Social class as represented in the work ✓ Social class of the writer/ creator ✓ Social class of the characters ✓ Conflicts and interactions between economic classes
MARXIST CRITICISM
32
subject texts to careful, formal analysis; however, they reach an opposite conclusion: there is no meaning in language.
Deconstructionist Criticism
33
They believe that a piece of writing does not have one meaning and the meaning itself is dependent on the reader.
Deconstructionist Criticism
34
Attempts to explain the behavioral underpinnings of the characters within the selection, analyzing the actions and thoughts committed
Psychological Criticism
35
Relies heavily on the author and his world; it is important to understand the author and his world in order to understand his intent and to make sense of his work
Historical Criticism
36
Concerned with comparing the work in question to other literature, to get a broader picture
Inter-textual Criticism
37
* seeks to see how well a work accords with the real world * How does a piece of literature accurately portrays the truth the main contention of this literary approach
Mimetic Criticism
38
assumes that there is a collection of symbols, images, characters, and motifs (i.e. archetypes) that evokes basically the same response in all people which seem to bind all people regardless of culture and race worldwide
ARCHETYPAL CRITICISM (Mythological and Symbolic Criticisms)