{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "name": "Brainscape", "url": "https://www.brainscape.com/", "logo": "https://www.brainscape.com/pks/images/cms/public-views/shared/Brainscape-logo-c4e172b280b4616f7fda.svg", "sameAs": [ "https://www.facebook.com/Brainscape", "https://x.com/brainscape", "https://www.linkedin.com/company/brainscape", "https://www.instagram.com/brainscape/", "https://www.tiktok.com/@brainscapeu", "https://www.pinterest.com/brainscape/", "https://www.youtube.com/@BrainscapeNY" ], "contactPoint": { "@type": "ContactPoint", "telephone": "(929) 334-4005", "contactType": "customer service", "availableLanguage": ["English"] }, "founder": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Andrew Cohen" }, "description": "Brainscape’s spaced repetition system is proven to DOUBLE learning results! Find, make, and study flashcards online or in our mobile app. Serious learners only.", "address": { "@type": "PostalAddress", "streetAddress": "159 W 25th St, Ste 517", "addressLocality": "New York", "addressRegion": "NY", "postalCode": "10001", "addressCountry": "USA" } }

Lesson 1.2: Structure of a Reaction paper, a Review, and a Critique Flashcards

Does not include Guidelines in Writing (11 cards)

1
Q

Structure of a Critiques of Scholarly Books and Articles:

A

Introduction 5%
Summary 10%
Review/Critique 75%
Conclusion 10%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

✓ Title of the book/ article/ work
✓ Writer’s name
✓ Thesis statement

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

✓ Objective or purpose
✓ Method used (if applicable)
✓ Major findings, claims, ideas, or messages

A

SUMMARY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

✓ Appropriateness of methodology to support the arguments (for books and articles) or appropriateness of mode of presentation (other works)
✓ Theoretical soundness and coherence of ideas.

A

REVIEW/ CRITIQUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

✓ Sufficiency and soundness of explanation in relation to other available information and experts.

✓ Other perspectives in explaining the concepts and ideas

A

REVIEW/ CRITIQUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

✓ Overall impression of the work
✓ Scholarly or literary value of the reviewed article, book, or work
✓ Benefits for the intended audience or field
✓ Suggestion for future direction of research

A

CONCLUSION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

For other types of review, there is no prescribed structure, but the following sections are almost always present.

A
  1. Introduction
  2. Plot Summary/Description
  3. Analysis/Interpretation
  4. Conclusion/Evaluation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

For other types of review

✓ Basic details about the material (title, director or artist, name of exhibition/event
✓ Main assessment of the material (for films and performance)

A

INTRODUCTION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

For other types of review

✓ Gist of the plot
✓ Simple description of the artwork

A

PLOT SUMMARY/ DESCRIPTION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

For other types of review

✓ Discussion of the work

A

ANALYSIS/ INTERPRETATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

For other types of review

✓ Reinforcement of main assessment
✓ Comparison to a similar work
✓ Recommendation of the material (if you liked it)

A

CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly