Lesson 4 Questions Self-Defence Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

How do UNSCR 1368 and 1373 support an expansive view of self-defence?

A

They recognize terrorist attacks as ‘armed attacks’ under Article 51 and emphasize obligations to prevent terrorism, supporting self-defence against non-state actors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the restrictive interpretation of UNSCR 1373?

A

It imposes duties on states to prevent terrorism but does not authorize use of force or allow cross-border self-defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the significance of UNSCR 2249 (2015)?

A

It reaffirms earlier resolutions and calls for ‘all necessary measures’ against ISIL, implying support for self-defence without explicitly authorizing force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the legal gap between use of force and armed attack?

A

Some uses of force do not qualify as ‘armed attacks’ under Article 51, creating a gap in legal response options.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is this legal gap addressed?

A

Restrictive view uses non-forcible responses; expansive view treats serious acts by non-state actors as armed attacks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can Ukraine lawfully attack Russian territory under self-defence?

A

Yes, if attacks target military objectives and meet necessity and proportionality under Article 51.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the historical origin of the Crime of Aggression?

A

It was included in the Nuremberg Trials as a ‘crime against peace’ but lacked a clear legal definition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does GA Resolution 3314 do?

A

Defines acts of aggression and influenced the ICC’s definition in Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the ICC’s definition of the Crime of Aggression (Article 8 bis)?

A

It is the planning or execution by a leader of an act of aggression that is a manifest violation of the UN Charter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the ICC’s definition differ from Nuremberg?

A

ICC’s definition is codified, applies only to leaders, and was agreed by treaty unlike Nuremberg’s ad hoc tribunal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is the CoA called the ‘supreme crime’?

A

Because it enables other international crimes like war crimes and crimes against humanity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the limitations of prosecuting the CoA?

A

Only applies to ratifying states or via UNSC referral; excludes non-party nationals under Article 15 bis(5).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does complementarity mean for CoA?

A

ICC only prosecutes when states are unwilling/unable, but many states lack domestic CoA laws, weakening this principle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What role does the UN Security Council play in CoA?

A

It can refer cases under Article 15 ter, allowing ICC jurisdiction even over non-state parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Kampala Amendment’s impact on jus ad bellum?

A

It criminalizes aggressive war-making and strengthens the UN Charter’s prohibition of force, but with limited reach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the ICC’s threshold for CoA?

A

The act must be a manifest violation of the UN Charter, based on character, gravity, and scale.

17
Q

What does the opt-out clause under Article 15 bis(4) mean?

A

A state can declare it does not accept ICC jurisdiction over CoA; effective immediately upon declaration.

18
Q

What was the dispute at ASP 2017?

A

Whether ICC could prosecute aggression by nationals of non-ratifying states on ratifying territory; compromise restricted it.

19
Q

Why should Denmark ratify the Kampala Amendments?

A

To support rule of law, enable individual accountability for war-making, and strengthen the ICC.

20
Q

When did the CoA enter into force?

A

On 17 July 2018, for ICC member states that ratified the Kampala Amendments.

21
Q

Can Russia be prosecuted for aggression against Ukraine?

A

Not by the ICC unless the UNSC refers the case, which is unlikely due to Russia’s veto power.

22
Q

Does the CoA matter even if it can’t be enforced?

A

Yes, symbolically and normatively it reinforces legal standards and promotes future accountability mechanisms.