Lesson 9 Flashcards
(72 cards)
What is the central question in Fischer’s chapter on technology and grand strategy?
Whether great powers can shape technological change for strategic goals, or if technology acts independently as a constraint or enabler.
How does Fischer define technological change?
As invention, innovation, or diffusion that increases output without more input. It is the main driver of long-term economic growth. (Fischer et. al.)
What is one way technological change affects global politics? (Fischer)
It creates new strategic opportunities by expanding the technological frontier. (Fischer et. al.)
How does technological change have distributional effects? (Fischer)
Some technologies build on existing skills (competence-enhancing), others make old skills useless (competence-destroying). (Fischer et. al.)
How does technological change challenge offense-defense theory? (Fischer)
It shows that technology is not constant across countries, which affects the balance between offensive and defensive power.(Fischer et. al.)
Can technological change be part of great power competition? (Fischer)
Yes. It can be exogenous (arising from science) or endogenous (strategically driven by states). (Fischer)
Why is technological change uncertain, according to Fischer et al.?
Fischer et al. point out that its timing, direction, and impact are unpredictable, making adoption risky for states.
What role do complementary assets play in technological change, according to Fischer et al.?
Fischer et al. argue that success with new technology depends on having infrastructure, skills, and other supporting elements.
How does technology affect the sources of grand strategy, according to Fischer et al.?
Fischer et al. say it reshapes strategic needs, domestic coalitions, and prevailing ideas—like how the printing press changed Europe.
How do Fischer et al. describe the impact of technology on strategic goals?
Fischer et al. state that it can shift national independence, shape domestic politics, and even render old goals irrelevant.
According to Fischer et al., how does technological change influence strategic instruments?
Fischer et al. highlight effects on economic resources, military power, and uncertainty about a technology’s effectiveness.
What are the direct effects of grand strategy on technology, according to Fischer et al.?
Fischer et al. give examples like the US Offset Strategies, where military needs drove nuclear and stealth tech development.
What are the indirect effects of grand strategy on technology, according to Fischer et al.?
Fischer et al. show how military tech, like sonar or missile subs, led to civilian advances like ocean science and satellite systems.
How can grand strategy promote or hinder tech growth, according to Fischer et al.?
Fischer et al. say military investment can lead to spin-offs (e.g., the internet), but may also hurt civilian innovation by shifting talent and funding.
What is Fischer et al.’s final argument about technology in global politics?
Fischer et al. conclude that economics, politics, and technology are deeply interconnected and deserve more scholarly focus in IR.
What does Schmidt say is transforming the international security environment?
Schmidt highlights the convergence of intensifying US-China-Russia geopolitical competition and rapid AI advances as key forces reshaping global security.
Why are AI-driven global platforms a concern, according to Schmidt?
Schmidt notes that these platforms concentrate power and create national security risks if hosted or controlled by rival nations.
How can global platform dependence become a strategic vulnerability, according to Schmidt?
Schmidt warns that rivals could weaponize this dependence by denying access to services during a crisis.
What strategic concerns do AI platforms raise, according to Schmidt?
Schmidt says platforms raise issues of control, regulation, data access, and influence over social norms—turning them into instruments of international strategy.
According to Schmidt, who are the main global AI competitors?
The US and China, with the US leading in talent and research, but China potentially overtaking within a decade. India and Europe also play key roles.
How does AI increase national security threats, according to Schmidt?
Schmidt explains that AI worsens cyber threats, speeds up warfare, and could destabilize nuclear deterrence, especially in open societies.
What role does data security play in AI-era national security, according to Schmidt?
Schmidt emphasizes that AI complicates data protection and increases vulnerability to influence and AI-enabled cyberattacks.
What does Schmidt say about AI and military unpredictability?
AI creates instability in military planning by introducing speed and unpredictability, risking unintended escalation and strategic miscalculation.
What are the risks of military AI systems, according to Schmidt?
Schmidt warns they could act beyond human control, escalate conflict quickly, and threaten nuclear stability by locating nuclear assets.