Market efficiency Behaviour Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Stock prices: what happens?

A

random walk
–> stock market predictability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A random walk: definition

A

a random process in a discrete period t=1,2i.e., a sequence of random states
𝑋𝑡 that are connected to each other

xt = Xt-1 + rt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

random increment r1,r2…

A

independent and identically distributed (iid)

Cov (rt+ 1, rt) = 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Price changes are…

A

random

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If past price changes could predict future price changes, one could easily…

A

make a profit. But there is no free lunch.
–> You can’t get something for nothing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Randomness is not a sign of irrationality, it is consistent with?

A

with rational market participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

new information is released, market participants process this information and prices adjust accordingly:

A

adjustment process is very fast as only the fastest traders will make a profit from the new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Share prices in an efficient market:

A
  • Prices in financial markets immediately and correctly reflect all publicly available information –> everything that can be
    derived from it
  • Unpredictability: As price changes reflect the random flow of new information, price changes must also occur randomly.
  • Random Walk: Prices change erratically as new and value relevant information arrives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 forms of market efficiency

A
  1. weak-form efficiency
  2. semi-strong-form efficiency
  3. strong-form efficiency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

weak-form efficiency

A

A market is weak-form efficient if it is not possible to achieve systematically superior investment performance (on average,
across segments, and periods of market occurrences) on the basis of the analysis of historical prices and returns

–> they are well-known and incorporated in today’s prices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

semi-strong- form efficiency

A

A market is semi-strong-form efficient if it is not possible to achieve systematically superior investment performance (on
average, across segments, and periods of market occurrences) on the basis of all publicly available information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

strong-form efficiency

A

A market is strong-form efficient if it is not possible to achieve systematically superior investment performance (on average,
across segments, and periods of market occurrences) on the basis of any information, public or private.
–> Hence, even insider information cannot be exploited!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does market efficiency work?

A
  1. mpirically test whether market efficiency holds, researchers have analyzed how fast security prices respond to different types
    of information, such as earnings, dividend, or takeover announcements
  2. For takeovers this test of market efficiency has practical implications as well
  3. It is legally forbidden to disclose this tender price before the offer is made available to the public (insider trading)
    –> the bank and the regulator will monitor the movement of the stock price before the takeover announcement date. Any drift
    towards the offer price before the announcement is public could indicate information leakage and insider trading.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

transforms various “events” from calendar time to event time

A

each announcement takes place on day t = 0
–> To isolate the effect of an event on the stock return, we have to look at abnormal returns rather than raw returns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

market model: calculation

A

ARi = r^observed - rf - Bi (rm - rf)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

academics refer to “market efficiency”: 2 thing in mind

A
  • There is no free lunch: There are no arbitrage opportunities, i.e., riskless profits without any investment are not possible
  • Prices are equal to value: The market price of a security is equal to its fundamental value (e.g., the discounted stream of future dividends).

= definitions are not identical! For instance, the price of a stock might not be equal to its fundamental value, but arbitrageurs cannot act on this price difference (due to transaction costs, short-sale constraints,…)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

To challenge market efficiency

A
  • If you find two assets with identical cash flows which do not sell for the same price, one market efficiency assumption is violated
  • 2 example of challenges to market efficiency which academics have documented :
    –> Siamese twin companies (Royal Dutch Shell)
    –> Equity carve outs (3COM/ Palm)
18
Q

Equity carve outs: definition

A

capital market transactions in which a
company decides to sell off part of its business in the form of an IPO

19
Q

Momentum

A

A simple strategy that buys past “winner” stocks and sells short past “loser” stocks.

20
Q

To assess the real performance of the strategy

A

The index must be exactly replicated and include all stocks that were ever included.
Ex-ante rules need to be applied to stocks that disappear (because of takeover, delisting, bankruptcy) or drop out of the SMI

21
Q

Behavioral finance : what do they explain ?

A

why prices can depart from fundamental values.

22
Q

Behavioral finance : underlying assumption

A

People are not always rational

23
Q

Behavioral finance usually relies on…

A

insights from psychology and attempts to explain empirically observed patterns which are inconsistent with rational investors and efficient markets

24
Q

people are risk-averse when?

A

it comes to choices involving gains

25
people are risk-seeking when..
it comes to choices involving losses
26
Disposition effect
People often exhibit inconsistent behavior depending on the framing of the lottery: They are risk-averse regarding gains (selling their stocks after they have increased by 10%) but risk-seeking regarding losses (not selling their stocks even if they have lost 20% in value)
27
Behavioral finance – Beliefs about probabilities: definition
People make all sorts of systematic biases when assessing the likelihood of uncertain events or when interpreting data
28
3 behavioral biases
- Anchoring - Overconfidence - Ambiguity aversion
29
Behavioral finance – Anchoring
Numerous studies have shown that people are influenced by (numerical) anchors --> The same behavior can be observed when trading stocks! The purchase price serves as an anchor when deciding whether to sell the stocks in the future (which is irrational).
30
Behavioral finance – Overconfidence
- people are overconfident when assessing probabilities about uncertain events or when comparing themselves to their peers (e.g., everyone is sure to be the best car driver around) - Overconfidence often leads investors to hold themselves responsible for good performance, but uncontrollable circumstances and bad luck for bad performance - overly optimistic self-assessment that may trigger excessive trading and high trading costs
31
Behavioral finance – Ambiguity aversion
is a concept from behavioral finance and decision theory that describes people's tendency to prefer known risks over unknown risks, even when the expected outcomes are the same
32
Behavioral finance: Individual trading behavior
One could expect overconfident people to trade more excessively since they are convinced about their superior investment ability men are more (over-) confident in their trading abilities, among other activities, than women
33
Men trade significantly more than women
average 45%, single men even trade 67% more than single women
34
The gross performance between men and women
about the same
35
excessive trading of men hurts their performance due to ..
high trading costs
36
individuals and mutual funds that trade the most, earn ?
lowest return
37
Conservatism
The momentum pattern is consistent with underreaction to news and delayed overreaction (due to extrapolation) Consistent: Large parts of momentum profits stem from the days around earnings announcements
38
CEO overconfidence is measured by two proxies
− CEOs’ personal over-investment in their company: Managers who fail to exercise in- the-money executive stock options prior to expiration. − CEO’s press portrayal: CEOs who are characterized as “confident” or “optimistic” versus “cautious”, “conservative”, etc. by the business press.
39
The market reaction at merger announcement (-90 basis points) is significantly more negative than ..
non-overconfident CEOs (-12 basis points)
40
Overconfident CEOs overestimate their ability..
to generate returns. As a result, they overpay for target companies and undertake value-destroying mergers
41
The effects are strongest if they have access to internal financing and thus are ...
not subject to outside monitoring