Measure for Measure context Flashcards
James I similarity
Asserts authority over ‘his laws’ and acts through intermediaries
1599 publication of Basilikon Doron showed interest in ethics of leadership - sympathetic to Roman laws that eventually triumph
Stevenson
Play written to flatter James as Duke ‘based on many of his attributes’
James and the King’s Men
Shakespeare was likely reinforcing the patriarchal rule of his patron - James took over the King’s Men from George Carey in 1603
Popham
Angelo’s corruption in office is similar to Chief Justice Popham, who spearheaded anti-brothel initiatives in London and led a precise life, but was widely suspected of hypocrisy
Play exemplifying Puritan agenda
Shakespeare exemplifies the Puritan agenda by purposely setting his play in an extreme world where the crime of sexual misconduct is punishable by death
Satirical of Puritans
The play is arguably satirical of hypocrisy and the righteous nature of Puritanism
Written 1603-04, a time of Puritan activity demonstrated by the 1603 Millenary Petition
Puritan characters and values
Angelo and Isabella are key puritanical figures
Followed Calvinist doctrine, double predestination stated only ‘elect’ would go to heaven
In late 16th century, Puritans wanted reform of the Church from within
Contemporary marriage complications
Marriage complications added to by change in canon law following the Hampton Court Conference of 1604
Long, complicated and drawn out process
Ironically targeted invalid Puritan marriages due to rejection of ‘superstitious’ ceremony
Contemporary punishments
Audiences used to public pillory and stocks
Church courts punished sexual transgressions, however there were inconsistencies due to sporadic campaigns of Puritan moralists
Claudio’s punishment
Extreme
Conventional for couple to take each other as man and wife well before ceremony - had legal force
Incontinence denounced by Puritans, but no laws against it
Allusion of title
Alludes to Matthew 7.1-2
Extract centred around retribution, justice and mercy
1559 proclamation banned religious plays - allusions common
Play ambiguity
Characterised by indeterminacy - could be comedy or dark play
Read in multiple ways to please nobles and wider social spectrum
1950 interpretation
Peter Brook - Memorial Theatre in Stratford
Brook - registers
Played in 2 registers to ‘follow the movement’ from Holy to Rough
Holy - attempts to go beyond physical
Rough - belongs to folk culture, improvisatory
Brook - darkness
Darkness in this world ‘absolutely necessary’
More meaning in Dostoevskian setting
Depends on interrelationship of registers
Brook - Vienna setting
Sleazy, grimy Vienna where bawds dominated
Stage populated with ‘prostitutes, beggars, cripples and degenerates’ (Venezky) - detached from rulers
Brook - Holy theatre role
Only dominated final scene
2 mins for Barbar Jefford’s Isabella to kneel
Brook - Pompey
George Rose played him with ‘leering amiability’ (Venezky)
Brook - Angelo
John Gielgud - grave and unsmiling, shocked by his own desires
Brook - Duke
Harry Andrewes - benevolent and taught moral lessons
Patient and Christlike
Brook didn’t question motives - production ‘Duke-central’ (Weil)
1970 interpretation
John Barton
Barton - proposal
Met with silence for 1st time
Barton - nature of the problem
First time Isabella’s dilemma was the problem - having been abused by men, she might not want to marry one she hardly knows
Barton - end of play
Ends with Isabella alone and ambivalent on stage - her play