Media Influence On Antisocial Behaviour Flashcards
How does social learning theory explain media influence on anti social behaviour? (1)
Social learning theory suggests that we observe models and imitate their behaviour. This means that if we observe a model that is taking part in some form of anti social behaviour, we are likely to imitate this behaviour in the future.
What are three theories that explain how media has an influence on antisocial behaviour? (3)
- Social learning theory
- Cognitive priming
- Desensitisation
What characteristics do models have to have to make them ‘good models’?
- Seen as successful
- Someone we admire
- Someone who gets positively reinforced for their actions
What are the two studies that support social learning theory’s reasons for media influence on anti social behaviour? (2)
- Bandura’s Bobo Doll Study
2. Parke et al’s Young Offenders study
What participants were used in Bandura’s Bobo Doll study? (Number, ages and where from?)
- 36 boys and 36 girls
- Aged between 3 and 6 years
- From Stanford University Nursery
Procedure of Bandura’s Bobo Doll Study? (3) (number of participants per group, what each group done and what each participant done after)
- Participants were split up into three groups of 24
- Group 1- shown violent model
Group 2- shown non-violent model
Group 3- control group (shown nothing) - Each participant was then filmed in a room with several toys including a bobo doll and observers recorded the child’s behaviour
Findings/conclusion of Bandura’s Bobo Doll study (1)
- Bandura’s research showed that specific anti social acts can be learned through observing models and can lead to an increase in aggressive tendencies.
Evaluative points of Bandura’s Bobo Doll study (2 pro, 5 neg)
Pros:
- Well executed
- Lab experiment- high control- high internal validity
Cons:
- Unrepresentative sample due to age and where the participants came from- lowers external validity
- Unethical
- Demand characteristics- lowers internal validity
- Lab experiment- lacks mundane realism- lowers external validity
- Aggression is innate?
Participants in Parke et al’s Young offenders study? (2) (Who and where they live)
- Young offenders
2. In an institution
Procedure of Parke et al’s Young offenders study (3) (what happened and how was findings taken?)
- Normal TV subscription was terminated
- Participants in 1 of 2 groups: the violent TV group or the non- violent TV group
- Institution staff observed and recorded the behaviour of the offenders
Findings of Parke et al’s Young Offenders study (1)
- Found that those who were exposed to the violent TV showed more aggressive tendencies than the other group
Evaluative points of Parke et al’s Young Offenders study (1 pro 5 cons)
Pros:
1. Field experiment- higher ecological validity than a lab experiment
Cons:
- Unrepresentative sample- lowers external validity
- Demand characteristics- lowers internal validity
- Unethical
- Bias and subjective (use of institution staff)- lowers internal validity
- Already in institution for antisocial behaviour- predisposed?
What is the study that contradicts Social Learning Theory? (1)
- St Helena study
Procedure and findings of St Helena study. (2+1)
- TV was first introduced in 1995
- Teachers and peers were asked to rate levels of aggression
- They found no increase in the levels of aggression after the introduction of TV, suggesting that media does not have influence anti social behaviour.
Evaluative points of the St Helena study? (4 neg)
- Culturally bias- lowers external validity
- Subjective and bias- lowers internal validity
- 1995- outdated- lowers external
- Short term- may have had a different effect after long term exposure