Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Multistore model: Sensory memory

A

Capacity: 76%
Duration: Very Limited
Coding: Haptic, iconic, echoic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Multistore model: short term memory

A

Capacity: 7+-2
Duration: 18-30 secs
Coding: Acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Multistore model: long term memory

A

Capacity: unlimited
Duration: unlimited
Coding: semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Peterson and Peterson - Duration of STM

A

Lab experiment - participants were shown sets of trigrams and asked to recall them after a delay with the delay increasing by a few seconds each time

During the relay before recall they were asked a distraction task to prevent rehearsal, which was to count backwards

After 3 seconds they remembered 80% of the information and after 18 seconds they remembered less than 10%

Conclusion our short term memory is between 18-30 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Multistore model

A

Designed by Atkinson and Shiffrin

Three separate unitary stores

Information passes along in a linear fashion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluating Peterson and Peterson

A

Sample - psychology students

May have came across the multistore model previously therefore displayed demand characteristics to please the experimenter

Memory of psychology students may also be different to other people. They may have previously studied or participated in memory improvement tasks. Therefore the memory of psychology students cannot be generalised to non psychology students

Low ecological validity as lacks mundane realism

However highly controlled so easy to replicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Miller - Capacity of STM

A

We chunk large amounts of information to help us to remember it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bahrick - Duration of LTM

A

American university graduates shown pictures from their HS yearbook. They had to select names matching those in the photograph.

90% were able to correctly remember their old classmates 14 years after graduating and 60% could do it 47 year after.

Our LTM is semantically coded and can remember information for almost a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluating Bahrick

A

The difference between the 90% and 60% is unclear whether or not LTM gets worse with age, or does actually have a limited duration.

Psychologists are unable to explain whether LTM has an unlimited duration which is affected by factors such as aging, or if it is limited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

More evaluation of MSM

A

Clive Wearing

He was unable to remember events bur he was able to remember how to play the piano. This contradicts the MSM as it suggests there must be different types of LTM as oppose to a unitary store

Patient HM

Supports the rehearsal loop and the idea that memories must pass along linearly as he cant form long term memories due to damage to his STM

Patient KF

Could do visual tasks not auditory, must be different subsections to STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LTM - episodic memory

A

Explicit memory

Includes personal experiences ie first day of school

Have to consciously retrieve them

Brain area: hippocampus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LTM - semantic memory

A

Explicit

Knowledge, facts etc

Often start as episodic memories but not timestamped like they are

Brain area: temporal lobe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LTM - procedural memory

A

Implicit memory

How to perform certain actions or skills ie swimming or riding a bike

Automatic, unconscious

Brain area: cerebellum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tulving - Research to support different types of LTM

A

Aim: To investigate differences in processing of episodic and semantic

Method: Volunteers were injected with a small amount of radioactive gold and performed 8 trials, 4 requiring each different type of LTM

Results: Consistent differences in blood flows

Conclusion: Episodic and Semantic LTMs appear to involve different brain areas and therefore are separate forms of LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What real life applications is there for the knowledge of the different types of LTM?

A

Tailoring therapies to patients with different cases of amnesia

Ie spaced retrieval for semantic memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The working memory model - Central executive

A

The slave driver

Has overall control of working memory

Limited capacity - can only hold so much

Processes info from environment and send to slave systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The working memory model - Phonological loop

A

Consists of phonological store - holds words that are heard
An articulatory loop - allows you to rehearse the words and repeats them in your head. Codes acoustically. Limited duration (forgets after 2 secs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the word length effect

A

The capacity of the phonological loop is determined by how long it takes to say the word.

If the word is polysyllabic or takes longer than 2 secs to say it is harder to remember

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The working memory model - visuo-spatial sketchpad

A

Stores visual info when it is required.
Two subsystems,
Visual cache - Stores visual data
Inner scribe - records the arrangement of objects (where they are)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The working memory model - episodic buffer

A

Processes the information from all these components and integrates it all together. Links working memory to LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Neurophysiological evidence for WMM - Patient KF

A

He had a motorbike accident and was able to do visual tasks but struggled with auditory

They must be different subsections of STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Neurophysiological evidence for WMM - Neuroimaging

A

Ask them to do a verbal task and an auditory task

Different areas of the brain will light up!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Real life applications of WMM - ADHD

A

Can help them to filter their working memory by giving them short repeated instructions and breaking them down for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Additional AO3 for WWM

A

Not a lot of research on the CE

Limited as does not tell us how information gets into LTM and how it is encoded whereas multistore model tells us the process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Interference theory of forgetting
Two pieces of information get muddled in our memory. The more similar the information, the greater the chance of interference
26
Proactive interference
Old information hinders recall of new information
27
Retroactive interference
New information hinders recall of old information
28
Evidence to support interference theory - Dallenbach
Trained two groups of cockroaches to walk through a maze and then retested after 8 hours One group were wrapped in cotton wool and went to sleep The others were active The active group made 3 times as many errors due to interference
29
Evidence to support interference theory - Underwood and postman
Aim: Find out if new learning interferes with old Method: Group A asked to learn a list of words and then a second list of words with similar words Group B only learnt one list Results: Group B performed better Conclusion: Provides support for retroactive interference
30
Evidence to support interference theory - Mcgeoch and McDonald
Forgetting increases as a result of the similarity of the material
31
Cue dependant theory of forgetting
Cues are signs which help us to retrieve memories which havent been lost permanently
32
Encoding Specificity Principle (ESP)- Tulving and Thompson
Recall worsens if different cues are present during the recall and during the original learning
33
External vs internal cues
External - in the environment Internal - physiological/psychological
34
Evidence for context dependant forgetting - Godden and Baddeley
Aim: investigated the effect of environment on recall Method: Divers asked to learn lists of unrelated words in 4 different conditions (Learnt on beach and recalled on beach, learnt on beach recalled in water, learned in water and recalled on beach or learnt under water and recalled under water) Results: Higher retrieval if recalled in same location where originally learnt Conclusion: supports the idea of context dependent forgetting Also supports the encoding specificity principle
35
Evaluation of Godden and Baddleys study
Repeated measures so order effects Also demand characteristics
36
Practical applications of context dependent forgetting
In schools exams should be sat in classroom
37
Evidence for state dependant forgetting - Goodwin et al
Four conditions: Sober both days intoxicated both days sober first day and then intoxicated intoxicated first day and then sober More errors were made in the different state conditions supporting state dependant forgetting
38
Evidence for state dependant forgetting - Overton
Two groups of rats One group was given a drug, the other was not They were then placed in a maze and taught to escape an electrical shock When the rats in the group with the drug were placed back in the maze without the drug they could not remember how to escape the shock but when they were given the drug again they could recall how to do it
39
Eyewitnesses testimony
Refers to the recalled memory of a witness to a crime or incident Recorded in a police statement or given as verbal testimony to be used as evidence in a court of law
40
What is a schema
An underarching set of ideas/mental construct of the world
41
What is reconstructive memory
When you add things or change details of a particular event
42
What is a false memory
Something we believed happened but did not
43
Evidence for the effect of schema on memory - Bartlett
Had participants read a piece of writing then explain what they had read Supports schemas as people changed details based on their schemas ie “canoe” to “ship”
44
What is a leading question
Questions which are asked in a way to suggest a specific answer
45
Loftus and Palmer car crash study
5 groups with 9 participants each They were asked “how fast were the cars going when they _____ each other?” The 5 different verbs were “Smashed, collided, bumped, hit, contacted” Results: On average the group who were given “smashed” gave a speed of 40.8 whereas the group who were given “contacted” gave a speed of 31.8 Conclusion: How you ask a question can influence/change peoples responses - EWT may be less accurate
46
Loftus and Pickrell false memories study
Aim: to see whether false memories can be created through suggestion Method: Participants received a questionnaire in the mail about 4 scenarios, they had to state whether or not they remembered the memory and write about it in as much detail as possible Results: 25% of people recalled getting lost in the supermarket as a child when they did not, however they were less confident about this and wrote less about this “memory” Conclusion: This supports the idea that false memories can be created from suggestion
47
Ethical implications of false memory - Harvey Weinstein and Loftus
False memory and understanding into it can lead to negative implications as it can be used as an alibi for people like Harvey Weinstein
48
Contradictory research for misleading information - Yuille and Cutshall
Aim: To see if post event information has the same effect on EWT In real life Method: 13 people who witnessed a real life armed robbery were interviewed 4 months after the crime and the interview included 2 misleading questions. Results: They were still able to give an accurate recall of the event compared to their initial reports. Conclusion: Post event information may not affect memory in real life EWT
49
Post event discussion - Memory conformity
People being influenced by another persons report. This may introduce mistakes therefore lead to inaccurate recall.
50
Post event discussion - Gabbert et al
Aim: to see if PED affects EWT Method: 2 groups of participants watched the same crime scene from different angles, allowing them to see different details The participants thought they were shown the same video. They then were asked to recall the event either alone or in pairs Results: 71% of witnesses who discussed the event reported at least one incorrect detail
51
Post event discussion - Wright et al
Method: Pairs of participants shown an identical crime but half saw an accomplice with the thief and half did not Results: After discussing the crime with the other person in the pair 75% of the pairs exhibited conformity
52
What do the studies of gabbert and wright suggest?
That what others around us are saying can influence our recall
53
Why do you think the participants in the gabbert and wright studies conformed?
NSI - They did not want to be the only one who missed a detail or gave an incorrect detail. Could also be interference - Hearing multiple different accounts so information may get muddled up in memory
54
What is the weapon focus effect
When people are in a stressful situation their attention is focused towards the most fearful aspect of the situation and away from the other details
55
Loftus/Johnson and scott’s weapon focus effect study
Aim: To investigate whether anxiety affects the accuracy of EWT Method: Participants were waiting in a waiting room and overheard a brawl with a receptionist. In one condition the man walked out with a pen in his hand. In the other he had a blooded knife. They were then asked to identify the man from a set of photographs. Results: Those who saw the man carrying a pen identified the correct person 49% of the time compared to 33% for those who saw the knife Conclusions: Provides support for the weapon focus effect and that this reduces the accuracy of EWT
56
Deffenbacher’s Yerkes-Dodson law
If our anxiety levels are too low our performance at a particular task will be worse As our anxiety levels increase we reach “optimum anxiety”, this is when our performance is best However as you exceed the optimum performance begins to drop again
57
The cognitive interview - What is wrong with the standard police interview
Lots of leading questions, Interruptions and often the details are being given by the officer as opposed to the person
58
The cognitive interview - Change of narrative order
The witness reports the crime im reverse chronological order This may eliminate schema or bias of what somebody may think has happened, can also help pick up on missed details they may have forgotten
59
The cognitive interview - Change of perspective
Reports the crime from the perspective of somebody else who was also there at the time of the crime This eliminates somebodys schema of what they expected to see, also may help their recall and help pick up on missed details
60
The cognitive interview - Mental reinstatement of context
Witness goes back to the crime scene mentally. Who was there, how they were feeling, What the weather was like. Same as context dependent forgetting, picking up cues will trigger memory
61
The cognitive interview - Report everything
Encouraged to give every detail no matter how silly or irrelevant Small memories may trigger bigger memories
62
Fisher et al
Witnesses were able to give more detail in their accounts of the crimes More structured than the standard interview allows more thorough interviews, and therefore more detail
63
Koehnken et al
Witnesses were actually more likely to give incorrect information compared to the standard More detailed recall increases the chance of making mistakes
64
Centofanti and reece
Aim: To see if CI is still susceptible to misleading info Method: Participants shown a video of a bank robbery and then presented with some form of misleading information Results: Although the participants with the CI recalled 35% more information they were still just as susceptible to leading questions and PED
65
What is the aim of the enhanced cognitive interview (ECI)
Seeks to build a trusting relationship between the interviewer and witness
66
What are the features of the ECI
1. Interviewer not distracting the witness with unnecessary interruptions/questions 2. The witness controlling the flow of the information 3. Asking open ended questions 4. Getting the witness to speak slowly 5. Participants being reminded not to guess and to say “I dont know” to reduce false memories 6. Reducing anxiety in witnesses
67
What is the modified cognitive interview
CI, but suitable for children. Removes the “change perspective” component as children are seen as being too young to effectively empathise with others They are also generally shortened versions May also get rid of “change narrative order”
68
Sperling (1960)
Aim: to investigate the capacity and duration of the sensory register, particularly iconic memory Procedure: participants were briefly shown a grid of 12 letters(3 rows of 4) for 50 milliseconds In the whole report condition they had to recall all 12, in the partial report a particular row was flashed and they had to remember those 4 Findings: In the whole report participants tended to remember 4-5 but in the partial they remembered 3/4 Conclusion: The sensory register has a large capacity but very limited duration with information fading rapidly unless it is attended to
69
Jacobs (1887)
Aim: to investigate the capacity of STM using digit span Procedure: Participants were presented with increasingly long sequences of digits or letters They had to recall them in the correct order Findings: average span for digits was 9.3 and for letters it was 7.3 Conclusion: STM has a limited capacity, around 7+- 2 items
70
Coding of short term memory: Baddley (1966)
Aim: to examine the coding of STM and LTM Procedure: Participants were given four sets of word lists to recall, acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar, semantically dissimilar For STM recall was immediate for LTM recall was after 20 minutes Findings: STM: recall worse when words acoustically similar due to confusioj LTM worse for semantically similar Conclusion: STM is coded acoustically and LTM is coded semantically