Memory Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

What is meant by coding?

A

The format, or type of information which is stored in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is meant by duration

A

the length of time information can be held in a certain memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is meant by capacity

A

the amount of information able to be held in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the coding in STM

A

acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the coding in LTM

A

semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the duration of the LTM

A

unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the duration of the STM

A

18-30 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the capacity of the LTM

A

up to a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the capacity of the STM

A

5-9 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What research is supporting coding of stm and ltm

A

Baddeley
(1966), who found that more mistakes are made when recalling acoustically-similar words straight
after learning them, whilst more mistakes are made when recalling semantically-similar words 20
minutes after learning them (LTM recall).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What research is supporting capacity of stm and ltm

A

Miller, things come in 7s
Jacobs demonstrated that the mean letter span was 7.3
and the mean digit span was 9.3 (i.e. the number of letters or digits we can recall after increasing
intervals).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What research supports the duration of stm and ltm

A

Petersen et al (1959), who found that
increasing retention intervals decreased the accuracy of recall of consonant syllables in 24
undergraduates, when counting down from a 3 digit number (preventing mental rehearsal).

Petersen et al (1959), who found that
increasing retention intervals decreased the accuracy of recall of consonant syllables in 24
undergraduates, when counting down from a 3 digit number (preventing mental rehearsal).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

weakness of memory studies?

A

Artificial tasks
lab studys
cofounding variables/ Jacobs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Strength of memory studies

A

High ecological validity, can be generalised to a wider population/ Bahrick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline the Multi store model of memory

A

Made up of 3 stores
sensory register
stores sub stores for each sense
unlimited capacity, duration of less than half a second, passes into the STM by attentiveness
Short term store
Long term store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weakness of the MSM

A

Different types of LTM as said by tulving
sees ltm as unitary
The MSM suggests that the amount of maintenance rehearsal determines the likelihood that the
information will pass into the LTM, whereas Craik and Watkins (1973) suggest that it is the type of
rehearsal which is more important. They suggest that elaborative rehearsal, instead of prolonged
rehearsal,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Strength of MSM

A

Inspired further research, deepened understanding of the memory Understands qualitative differences between the stm and ltm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the types of long term memory

A

Procedural
episodic
semantic

19
Q

What is procedural memory

A

Procedural memories describe our memories of ‘learned skills’, such as swimming or driving.

19
Q

What is episodic memory

A

Episodic memory describes those memories which have some kind of personal meaning to us,
alongside details as to when and how these events occurred, as well as the associated people and
places.

20
Q

what is semantic memory

A

Semantic memories describe our memories of the world and the associated knowledge e.g. an
understanding of what words, themes and concepts mean. An example would be the ability to use
information related to one concept to help us understand another.

21
Q

strengths of types of LTM

A

HM and Clive Wearing
Semantic memories describe our memories of the world and the associated knowledge e.g. an
understanding of what words, themes and concepts mean. An example would be the ability to use
information related to one concept to help us understand another.

22
Q

What is the working memory model

A

STM is made up of the central executive, the phonological loop, the visuo
spatial sketchpad and the episodic buffer.

23
Q

What is the central executive

A

‘attentional process’ with a very limited processing
capacity, and whose role is to allocate tasks to the 3 slave systems

24
What is the phonological loop
processes auditory information and allows for maintenance rehearsal by being made up of the articulatory process (stores the words you hear) and the phonological loop.
25
What is the visuo spatial sketchpad
combines the visual and spatial information processed by other stores, giving us a ‘complete picture’ e.g. when recalling the architecture of a famous landmark. The VSS us divided into the inner scribe and visual cache. The capacity of the VSS is around 4-5 chunks (Baddeley).
26
What is the episodic buffer
The episodic buffer integrates all types of data processed by the other stores (e.g. auditory, visual, spatial) and so is described as the storage component of the central executive, as well as being crucial for linking STM to LTM.
27
AO3 central executive
The central executive has not been precisely defined. For example, the term ‘process’ is vague, and the central executive may be made up of several sub-components or even be part of a larger component itself in working memory. This lack of a comprehensive explanation for each component of WMM draws doubts about the accuracy of its depiction of working memory.
28
AO3 of the working memory model +
+Shallice and Warrington’s study of KF provides support for the WMM because their findings show that KF had very poor STM recall for auditory stimuli, but increased STM recall for visual stimuli. This suggests that the components of memory which process auditory and visual stimuli are separate (as described in the WMM through the phonological loop and the visuo-spatial sketchpad).
29
AO3 of the working memory model ++
Studies of dual-task performance, where each participant must undertake a visual and verbal task simultaneously, shows decreased performance for such tasks and so supports the idea that the central executive has a very limited processing capacity (as predicted by the WMM) and that the slave systems are in competition with each other for these tasks and resources. +Neuroscanning evidence, such as that provided by Braver et al, has demonstrated a positive correlation between an increasing cognitive load processed by the central executive (as marked by increasing task difficulty) and increasing levels of activation in the prefrontal cortex. This supports the idea that the central executive has the role of allocating tasks to slave systems and has a limited processing capacity, as reflected by the increased brain activation levels, thus suggesting that the WMM is accurate in its mechanism of the central executive.
30
Explanations for forgetting
Interference occurs when the recall of one memory blocks the recall of another, causing forgetting or distorted perceptions of these memories. Pro Old interferes with new Retro New interferes with old
31
Outline retroactive interference and proactive interference as an explanation for forgetting
Interference can be retroactive (new memories block the recollection of old memories) proactive (old memories block the recollection of new memories).
32
Research support for interference
Retroactive interference was demonstrated by McGeoch and McDonald (1931), who found that when participants were divided into 6 groups to recall different lists of words (synonyms, antonyms, words unrelated to the original list, 3 digit numbers, consonant syllables) or no new list (control group), those who’d learnt the synonyms list experienced an average of 3.1 fewer correct items recalled, compared to the control group.
33
33
Two types of retrieval failure
Context and state dependant forgetting Context-dependent forgetting occurs when our external cues at the time of encoding do not match those present at recall. Baddeley deep sea diver study State-dependent forgetting occurs when our internal cues at the time of encoding do not match those present at recall. This was demonstrated by Carter and Cassaday (1998) Antihistamines
34
strength of retrieval failure
Eysenck has suggested that retrieval failure may be one of the main reasons that we forget information from the LTM. This, alongside the strictly-controlled conditions of a lab experiment (reducing the biasing effects of extraneous and confounding variables), increases the validity of retrieval failure as an explanation for forgetting, due to more confidence being placed in these conclusions on the basis of such experimental designs. research support from eysenck
35
weakness of retrieval failure
research support may lack ecological validity and lab study has demand characteristics
36
Factors affecting eye witness testimony's
misleading information in the form of leading questions and post event discussions
37
research support for EWT
Loftus and Palmer (1974) where participants watched a film clip of a car crash and then gave speed estimates of the cars based on the leading question of “About how fast were the cars going when they x into each other?”, with each group being exposed to a different critical verb. Those exposed to the verb “smashed” gave a speed estimate 8.7 mph greater than those who’d heard “contacted”. Therefore, this shows that leading questions, because of the way they are phrased, suggest that there is a correct answer.
38
Methodological Criticisms of Eyewitness Testimony (EWT) Studies
Own Age Bias: Young targets are often used in studies, leading to potential own age bias (Anastasi and Rhodes). Older participants may show lower accuracy due to frequently identifying younger targets. Demand Characteristics: Participants might give responses they think are expected by researchers, influenced by social desirability bias and the ‘Please-U’ effect (Zaragoza and McCloskey). Artificial Tasks and Stimuli: Studies like Loftus and Palmer use artificial stimuli (e.g., film clips) that lack the anxiety of real-life scenarios, which may affect findings (Johnson and Scott, Yuille and Cutshall).
39
Factors Affecting the Accuracy of EWT: Anxiety
Johnson and Scott (1976): High-anxiety condition led to lower recall accuracy (16% lower) due to weapon focus effect. Yuille and Cutshall (1986): Real-life shooting witnesses with high anxiety showed high recall accuracy even after 5 months. Yerkes-Dodson Law: Describes an ‘inverted-U’ relationship between arousal and performance, suggesting moderate arousal leads to optimal performance.
40
Ethical Issues and Extraneous Variables
Ethical Concerns: Studies like Johnson and Scott's expose participants to distressing images, potentially causing psychological harm. Extraneous Variables: Real-life studies may have uncontrolled variables such as post-event discussions (
40
Improving the Accuracy of EWT: Cognitive Interviews
Cognitive interview techniques Report everything encourages recall of all details which can trigger larger events and memories Reinstate the content Prevents context dependant forgetting by recalling the environment and emotions Change the perspective Reduces schema effects by recalling events non chrono-logically
41
Practical Challenges of Cognitive Interviews
Training and Time: Effective implementation requires extensive training (Kebbel and Wagstaff). Recall of Incorrect Information: While increasing correct recall by 81%, it also increases incorrect recall by 61% (Kohnken et al., 1999). Partial Use: Some techniques like context reinstatement and report everything can still improve accuracy even if not all steps are used (Milne and Bull, 2002).