memory Flashcards

(89 cards)

1
Q

define STM and LTM

A
  • STM= limited capacity ( on average 5-9 items) , acoustically coded
    duration about 18-30 sec

-LTM= perminant memory store, semantically coded, unlimited caqpacity , can store info for up to a lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define coding, capacity and duration

A

1) coding= format in which information is stored in the various memory stores

2) capacity = the amount of info that can be held in various memory stores

3) duration= length of time information can be held in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is research in coding

A

the process of converting information between different forms is coding
Alan Baddeley gave different word lists to 4p’s
-group1 = acousitically similar eg cat, bat
- group2 = acoustically dissimilar eg rock, cow
- group 3= semantically similar eg great, large
-group 4=semantically dissimilar eg good, hot, orange

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what were the results of Baddeleys study into coding 1966

A

they were asked to recall the words in the correct order
when they did the task immediately ( testing for STM) recall was worse for acoustically similar words
when they recalled the words after time 20min ( testing LTM) they did worse with semantically similaqr words
- suggests info is recalled semanticaly in LTM and acoustically for STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is research into memory capacity ( digit span)

A

-Joseph Jacobs 1887 found out memory capacity by measuring digit span
eg researcher will read out x digit of words and the p’s will recall this, the researcher will add more words progessively
this indicates the individuals digit span
jacob found that the mean span for digits across all p’s were 9.3. mean for letters-7.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is research into capacity ( span of memory and chunking )

A

George Miller 1956 made observations of everyday practice eg he noticed that things usualloy come in 7s ( 7 days of the week, 7 notes on musical scale, 7 deadly sins)
miller thought the capacity of STM is 7plus minus 2
however ppl can recall more with chunking (grouping sets of digits / letters into units or chunks )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is reseach into duration of STM

A

peterson and peterson tested 24 students in 8 trials . on each trail p’s was given a consonant syllable or trigram eg TFG+ a 3 digit number which tey were told to count backwards from
counting backwards was to prevent any mental rehearsal
- told to stop after varying periods of time 3,6,9,12 sec.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

findings of peterson and petersons study on duration of STM

A

after 3 seconds = 80% recall
18%= 3% recall
suggests duration for stm is 18 sec

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

research into duration of LTM

A

bahrick et al studied 392 american p’s between 17-74.
high school yearbooks were obtained
how was recall tested? = in 2 ways (1) photo- recognition test consisting of 50 photos
(2)free recall test, p’s recalled name of all their graduating class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what wee the findings of bahrick et al duration of LTM

A

p’s tested within 15years of graduating -90% accuratacy in photo recognition
after 48years , recalled declined to about 70% for photo recognition
-free recall was less accurate than photo recog; -60% after 15years, . 30% after 48years
shows LTM has unlimited duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is an evaluation of baddeleys study

A

strenght; identified a clear difference between 2 memory stores .,important in understanding the MSM

limitation; used artificial stimuli rather than meaningul information eg word loists had no personal meaning to p’s. therefore may not reflect how memory is encoded in everyday life
suggests limited application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is a strenght of Jacobs study

A

strength of Jacobs;
- has been replicated
- as study was an old one and early research in psych lacked control. despite ts Jacobs findings have been conformed by other, better controlled studies eg Bopp and Verhaeghen 2005
suggets his study is a valid test of digit span

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

limitation of Millers research

A

may have overestimated STM capacity
Nelson Cowan 2001 reviewed other research and concluded that the capacity of STM is only 4 plus minus 1 chunks
may suggest that the lower end of millers estimate is more appropiate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

a limitation of peterson and petersons study

A

artificial stimulus, however the study is still valid as we sometimes do remeber meaningless information eg phone numbers. nonetheless it doesnt reflect daily life, lacking external validity and low mundane realism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

strength of Bahricks et al study

A

high external validity . researchers investigated meaningfull memories ( actual peoples names and faces) when studies on LTM were conducted with meaningless pictures to be remembered, recall rates were lower ( Shephard 1967)
suggests bahricks findings reflect a more real estimate of the duration of LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the multi store model

A

Richard Atkinson and RIchard Shiffrin 1968. MSM describes how info flows thru the memory system . suggests that memory is made up of 3 stores linked by processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

describe the sensory register

A
  • all stimulus from the environement eg some1 talking, pass into ts.
  • comprises several registers ( sensory memory stores ) one for each of our 5 senses
  • coding= modality specific eg store coding for visual info is iconic memory , store coded acoustically= echoic
  • DURATION= half a sec
  • CAPACITY= very high capacity eg over one hundred million cells in one eye, each storing data
  • info passes further if u pay attention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

describe short term memory

A
  • coded acoustically
  • lasts about 18seconds without rehearsing
  • limited capacity
  • according to Miller= 7+-2, according to Cowans research may be more likely 5 than 9
  • maintenance rehearsal = allows info to be kept longer in STM
    if we rehearse it long enough- go itno LTM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

describe LTM

A
  • potentially perminant
  • semantically coded
  • psychologists believe its duration is up to a lifetime ( ts notion supported by Bahrick et als study with school yearbook)
  • retrieval = info transfered back into STM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

who is HM and whats his significance

A
  • henry molaison
  • underwent brain surgery due to his severe epilepsy
  • ts procedure was in its infancy and not fully understood
  • hippocampus got removed from both sides ( central memory function)
  • when his memory was assessed in 1955 he thought the year was 1953 and that he was 27 ( he was acc 31)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what were the effects of HMs surgery

A
  • he coudnt form new long term memories
    eg he could read the same magazine repeatedly without remembering it
  • he coudnt recall what he had eaten the same day
  • but he perfomed well on tests of immediate memory span ( STM)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

research support for the MSM

A
  • Alan baddeleys results
  • further support comes from studies of capacity and duration we encountered
  • these studies show that LTM and STM are seperate and are independent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

limitation of MSM

A

too simple
suggests stm and ltm are single unitary stores, researchs differs
- working memory model shows stm divided into qualitively different stores .+ number of diff types of ltm
suggetss msm overly simplistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

supporting evidence for msm

A

studies using brain scanning techniues demonstrated diff between stm and ltm
beardsley 1997 found that the prefrontal cortex is active during stm but not ltm
Squire et al also used brain scanning and found hippocampus is active during ltm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
research support for msm using case studies
- HM ( scoville and milner 1957) - brain damage - removal of hippo - his personality and intellect remained intact but coudnmt form new LTM , although he could remmeber things from before his surgery - support for MSM notion of seperate stores as HM was unable to transfer info from his STM and LTM but was able to retrieve info from before surgery ( LTM)
26
give a descripton of the WMM
Baddeley and hitch 1974 found that the STM was not just one store but a number of diff stores - consists of central executive, episodic buffer, phonological loop, visuo spacial sketchap
27
what is the CE
- monitors and coordinates all other mental functions in working memory - direct attention to particular tasks , determing how the brains ' slave systems' - limited capacity
28
what is the phonoliogical loop
- codes speech sounds in working memory, typically involving maintenance rehearsal - limited capacity - deals with auditory information , preserves the order of information baddeley subdividied this loop into 1)n phonological store = inner ear, holds the words you hear 2) the articulatory process = words heard or seen , silently repeated ( inner voice ) . form of maintenance rehearsal
29
what is the visuo spatial sketchpad
- used when you have to plan a spatial task eg getting from one place to another - visual and or spatial information is temproarily stored here ( visual info= what things look like, spatial info= physical relationship between things . - Logie 1995 suggestedthat the visuo spatial sketchap can be divided into; 1)visual cache = stores info about visual items eg form and colour 2) inner scribe= stores the arrangement of objects in the visual fieldv
30
what is the episodic buffer
- added by Baddeley in 2000) as he realised the model needed a general store - as there was no where to hold info that relates to both visual and acoustic info - intergrates info from the CE the PL and the CSS. maintains a sense of time sequencing ( ultimately it records episodes that are happends - sends info to LTM
31
limitation of WMM ( problem with case studies )
- theres bare research support for the WMM which comes from case studies - process of brain injury is traumatic which may in it self change behaviour so that the person may become worse on certain tasks - individual differences; some people may have other issues like difficulty concentrating and therefore underperfom on tasks - case studies are of unique individuals and cannot be generalised to the population
32
research support for WMM ( brain damage ppls)
- Shallice and Warrington 1970 studied KF - he was able to see but he had bare forgetting of auditory info - his auditory problems were limited to verbal material such as letters and digits but not meaningful sounds ( like the phone ringing) - theefore his brain damage seemed to be restricted to the PL - another patient SC had good learning abilities but unable to learn word pairs that were presented out loud ( suggesting damage to the PL- Troano and Grossi 1995) - anothe patient LH who had been involved in a road accident perfomed better on sptial tasks than those involving visual imagery ( Farah et al 1988) - ts supports the ideaof seperate visual and spatial systems as suggested by the WMM
33
whats a criticism of the CE
- some psychologists say its too vague and simplistic - it only allocates resources and is essentially the same as 'attention' - critics also feel that the notion of a single CE is wrong and that there should be multiple componenets - Eslinger and Damasio 1985 studied EVR , he had a cerebral tumour removed - he perfomed el on tasks requiring reasoning ( suggetsting and intact CE) but he had poor decision making skills, suggestting his CE isnt wholly intact - the CE may be more complex that baddley and hitch illustrated it to be
34
another evaluation; neuroimaging
PET scans have shown that different brain areas are activated during visual and verbal tasks, aligning with the visuospatial sketchpad and phonological loop. - they sugget the left hemisphere of brain is associated with visual tasks - right hemisphere is associated with spatial info
35
what is LTM divided into
explicit ( declarative memory) and implicit ( procedural )
36
what are episodic memories
personal memories of events includes contextual details and emotional tone eg first day of skl time stamped
37
what are semantic memories
- knowledge about the world which is shared by everyone eg capital city of france is paris , 2+2=4 may relate to function of objects , social customs, abstract concepts - semantic memories generally begin as episodic memories as we aquire knowledge based on personal experiences . - there is a gradual transition from episodic to semantic memory where the memory slowly loses its association to particular events
38
what is procedural memory
concerned with skills , eg knowing how to read or ride a bike - remmebering how to do something rather than remmebering the rules for how to do it - aquired thru repitition and practice - its implicit
39
support for the types of LTM
brain scans - episodic = hippocampus and other parts of the temporal lobe where the hippocampus is located + activity in the frontal lobe - semantic = temporal lobe - procedural = cerebellum which is involved in the control of fine motor skills as well as motor cortex. + basal ganglia and limbic system
40
further research support ; distinguishing episodic and semantic memories
- comes from patients with Alzheimers - research saught to explain relationship between episodic and semantic by studying patients with Alzheimers - found some patients who retain the ability to form new semantic memories but not episodic memories ( Hodges and Patterson 2007) - second dissociation was found by Irish et al 2011 in Alzheimers pateints who have the reverse; poor semantic memories but generally intact episodic memories - ts double dissociation suggests episodic and semantic seperate
41
further research support ( HM)
- HMs ability to form new LTM affected by destruction of hippocampus but he retainerd pre existing LTMS - after surgery he could still form procedural memories but not episodic or semantic eg he was able to learn to draw a figure by looking at its reflection in a mirror ( AKA mirror drawing ) ( Corkin 2002); this is procedural memory but he had no memory that he learnd this - this supports the distinction ebtween procedural and declarative memories ; support existince of multipe types of LTM
42
limitation of evidence from patients with brain damage
- difficulty with studies of amnesiacs including HM is that its difficult to be certain of the exact parts of the brain that have been affected until the patient has died ; most studies are conducted using living patients - damage to a particular area of the brain doesnt necessarily mean that its responsible for a specific behaviour ; may be acting as a relay station - suggetss we cannot establish a causal relationship between a particular brain region and type of LTM
43
define retroactive interference
current attemps at learning something interferes with past learning
44
describe retroactive interference
- georg Muller and his student ( Muller and pilzecker 1900) were first to identify retroactive interference - gave ps a list of random syllables to learn for 6min and den after a retention interval asked ps to recall the lists - performance was shit if ps had been given intervening tasks between initial learning and recall ( they were shown three landscape paintings and asked to describe them) - the intervening tas produced RI coz the later task ( describing pics ) interfered w what has been previously learnt
45
define proactive interference
past learning interferes with current attempts at learning sum
46
describe proactive interference
- Benton Underwood 1957 showed that proactive interference could be equally significant - analysed findings from bare studies - found that when p's have to learn a series of world lists tey do not learn the lists of words encountered later on in the sequence as well as the lists encountered earlier on - he found that if p's memories 10 or more world lists after 24h recall= 20% - if they only learned one list recall= 70%
47
what is support for the notion that recall is sstrongest the more similar items are
- McGeoch and Mcdonald 1931 experimented with the effects of similarity of materials - gave ps list A ( list of adjectives - after ts was learnt they was an interval where they learnt list B followed by recall - if List b was sysnonym of list A, recall= 12% - if list B was bs = 26% recall - if list b was numbers this had 36% recall
48
whats a limitation of evidence into interference
- artificial lists of words or nonesense syllables - dont relate to everyday life - low mundane realism and ecological validity - ps may lack motivation to remember the links in such studies this may allow interference affects to appear stronger than they really are
49
whats another criticism of interference
- it only explains some situations of forgetting - while interference occurs in daily life, not often - eg the 2 memories must be similar may not be the best explanation for everyday forgetting - Anderson 2000 concluded that interference deffo plays role in forgetting but how much forgetting can be attributed to it is unknown - means theories are needed to provide a complete explanation of forgetting
50
whats an A03 for interference that relates to accessibility vs availability
- researchers have questioned whether interference effects cause a memory to dissappear or whether interference effects are only temporary - Ceraso 1967 found that if memory was tested again after 24h recognition ( accessibility ) showed considerable recovery,whereas recall ( availabiltiy ) remained the same - may suggest that interference occurs as memories are temporarily not accessibly rather than actually being lost
51
A03 on interference ; individual diff
- Kane and Engle 2000 showed ppl better working memory were less susceptible to proactive interference - they gave p's 3 word lists to learn ; p's w lower WM span showed more proactive interference when recalling the second and third lists compared to p's with higher spans
52
define retrieval failure
occurs due to absence of cues explanation for forgetting ( lack of accessibility rather than availability)
53
briefly explain the encoding specificity principle
- Endel Tulving and Donald Thomson 1973 proposed that memory is most effective if information that was present at encoding is also available at retrieval. - the closer it is to the original the more useful it will be
54
whats the study that tulving andc pearstone did to demonstrate the value of retrieval is
- in a study where p's had to learn 48 words belonging to 1 categories eg fruit- apple, fruit- orange - 2 diff recall conditions - either had to free recall or they were given cues in the form of category names - free recall condition = 40% of words were recalled on average - cue recall- 60% of words
55
what is context depdent forgetting
- eg by Ethel Abernethy 1940 . she arranged for group of students to be tested before a certain course has begun. they were tested each week - some students tested in their teaching room by usual instructor. others tested by a diff instructor others tested in a diff room either by usual or diff instructor - 4 experim cond. in ts study - those tested by same instructor in same room performed best due to memory cues
56
what did Godden and Baddeley 1975 investigate the effects of contextual cues
- recruited suba divers as p's amd arranged for them to learn a set of words either on land or underwater . - results= highest recall pccured when the initial context matched the recall environment
57
what is state dependent forgetting
the mental state ur at in time of learning Goodwin et al 1969 asked males to remember a list of words when they were either drunk or sober (those in drunk condition imbibed 3 times the UK driving limit) - the p's were asked to recall the lists 24h later - recall when drunk is more available when in the same state later
58
whats a strenght of retrieval cues
- lot of research support - high ecological validity
59
whats a limitation of retrieval cues
danger of circularity - dange between encoding cues and later retrieval is a correlation rather than a cause - Nairrine 2002 calls this the 'myth of the encoding retrieval match' - Baddeley made a similar criticism ; if a stimulusleads to the retrieval of a memory then it mustve been encoded if it doesnt lead to retrieval, according to the encoding specificity principle it cant have been encoded - suggests that the cues dont cause retrieval they are associated with retrieval
60
strenght of retrieval cues
real world application Smith 1979 showed just by thinking of the room where you did original learning ( mental reinstatement ) was as effective as actually being in room - shows research itno retrieval failure can suggest straegiues for improving recall in real life eg taking exams, eye witmess testimony
61
another limitation fo retrieval failure
Overemphasis on Context: The theory can overemphasize the role of context, potentially neglecting other factors that influence forgetting, such as interference or the passage of time,
62
why is eye witness testinmony sometimes seen as unreliable
- hghlighted by the innocence project who claim that 72% of convicts overturned by DNA testing involved inaccurate eye witness testimony
63
explain loftus and palmer 1974 ( leading Q)
-45 students showed 7 films of diff traffic accidents - after each, p's given Qstonaire which asked them to describe the accident and asked bare Q about it - there was one critical Q ' about how fast were the cars going when they hit eachother ' one group of p's were given ts - the 4 other groups were given the verbs ( smashed collided bumped and contacted ) - ts is a leading Q as it suggested the answer the P's might give
64
what were the findings of Loftus and Palmer 1974 study
smashed= 40.8 collided= 39.3 bumped= 38.1 hit= 34.0 contacted= 1.8 suggests leading Q may bias a p's resonse or may cause info to be altered
65
what was another experiment loftus and Palmer did to test leading Q more
- new set of p's divided into 3 groups and shown a film of a car accident lasting 1 min and again asked questions about speed - the p's came back a week later. asked 10 Q including a critical Q ' did you see any broken glass' - there was no broken glass.. results show that the leading Q did change the memory of the event for eg 16 of the people who said the cars ' smashed' into eachother said that there was broken glass
66
how important and significant is post event discussion, also define repeat interviewing
CONFORMITY EFFECT: - co witnesses may reach a consensus view of what happened. this was investigated by Fiona Gabbert and colleagues ( 2003 ) - p's were in pairs where each parner watched a diff video of the same event . - pairs in one condition were encouraged to discuss the event before each partner individuallly recalled what they wached - 71% of witnesses who had discussed the event went on to mistakenly recall items aquired in the discussion repeat interviewing; each time an eyewitness interviewed- comments of interviewer may be incorpoeratedinto their recollection of events - interviewers might use leading Q and thus alter individuals memory of events. especially the case in children being interviewed about crime ( LaRooy et al 2005 )
67
whats an event that portrays the real lifeconformity effect
-Oklahoma bombing was infamous crime i US 1995 - one witness claimed to see the murderer Timothy McVeigh with an accomplice initially no witnesses could describe ts person but later theytoo claimed to recall them. eventually the first witness realised that their recollection was wrong. why did the 2 othe witnesses make the same mistake ? conformity influence. led them to believe that there was a second man too
68
describe what Elizabeth Lofut sdid to invetyigate leading questions
asked people the Q ' do you get headaches often' = reported average of 2.2 headaches per week those asked ' do you get headaches occasionally and if so how often'= 0.7headaches
69
A03; real world application of EWT
- application to the criminal justice system. relies heavily on eye witness identification for investigating and prosecuting crimes - psychologisical research has been used to warn the justice system of provlems with EWT. EWT was the largest single factor contributing to the conviction of innocent ppl ( Wells and Olson 2003)
70
A03 ; individual differences in EWT
number of studies ( Schacter et al 1991 ) found that comared to younger subjects, old pl have difficulty remebering source of info .even tho their memony for the info itself is unimpaired . - they become more prone to effect of misleading info when giving testimony - suggests individual differences are a important factor when assessing reliability of EWT
71
a03 . EWT . ecological validity ?
lab exp such as Loftus = may not represent real life. low mundane realism and low ecological validity. - take it less seriously than if it happened irl - Foster et al 1994 found that if p's thought they were watching a real life robbery and thought they there responses would influence the trial ; their identification of robber was more accurate - Yuille and Cutshell 1986 also found that witnesses to an armed robbery in canada gave very accurate reports of te crime 4 months later despite initially being given 2 leading Q
72
what is supporting evidence for EWT
Loftus conducted a memorable study involving cut outs of Bugs Bunny ( Braun et al 2002). colly student who had visited disney land as children were asked to evaluate advertising material about disnye land; containing misleading info abuout Bugs Bunny ( not a disney character ) or Ariel ( wasnt introduced at the time of their childhood ) - p's assigned to the Bugs or Ariel group were more likely to report shaking hands with these characters than the control group - misleading info= false memory
73
define anxiety
an unpleasant e otional state that is often accompanies by increased heart rate and rapid breathing
74
what is the weapon focus effect
- weapon focus effect - weapon in criminals hand distracts attention because of anxiety, from other features therfore reducing the accuracy of identification
75
describe the procedure of Johnson and Scott 1976 study
procedure ; - to test weapon focus effect Johnson and Scott asked p's to sit in a waiting room where they heard an argument in an adjoining room and then saw a man run through carrying either a pen covered in grease , or a knife covered in blood - p's later asked to identify man from photos
76
what were the findings of Johnon and Scotts study
- finding supported idea of weapon focus effeect. - mean accuracy was 49% in identifying the man in the pen condition , compared with 33& accuracy in the knife condition - Loftus et al 1987 showed that anxiety does focus attention to be drawn to weapon itself and away from other things like the guys face
77
what is the Yerkes Dodson effect
arousal or anxiety has a negative effect on performance such as memory recall when its very low or very high but modeate levels are beneficial . hence the U shape
78
whats the evolutionary argument that says high anxiety / arousal is goodie
evolutionary argument suggests that it would be adaptive to remember events that are emotionally important so that you could identify similar situations in the future and know how to respond eg escaping a lion
79
what did Christianson and Hubinette 1993 find about anxiety and recall
- found evidence of enhanced recall when they questionned 58 real witnesses to bank robberies in sweden. - witnesses were either victims ( bank teller ) or bystander ( customer) - interviews conducted 4-15 months after the robbery - all witnessed showed good recall ( better than 75%) those witnesses who were most anxious ( victims ) had the best recall of all - suggetss anxiety doesnt reduce accuracy
80
what did Kennneth Deffenbacher 1983 findaboyt EWT andanxiety
21 studies of the accuracy of the effects of anxiety . - 10 of these studies had results that linked higher arousal levels to increased EWT while 11 of them showed opposite - Deffenbacher suggested that the Yerkes Dodsoneffect can account for this apparant inconsistency
81
A03- weapon focus maynot cause anxiety
- Pickel 1998 proposed reduced accuracy of identification could be due to surprise - to test ts he arranged for p's to watch a thief enter a hair salon carrying ( scissors ; high threat, low surprise ), ( handgun; high threat, high surprise ) ,( wallet ; ( low threat, low surprise ), or a raw whole chicken ( low threat, high surprise ) - identification was least accuate in the high surprise conditions rather than high threat
82
A03; individual differents and EWT
- stated that 1 extraneous variable in bare studies is emotional sensitivity - Bothwell et al 1987 p's were tested for peronality characteristics and were labelled either ' neurotic ' or 'stable' - shown that the ' stable' p's showed rising levels of accuracy as stress increased . opposite was true for ' neurotics'
83
A03; lab studies and EWT
real life vs lab studies ; - strength oc CHristianson and Hubinette ( bank robberies in sweden ting ) - study of anxiety in real life - lab studies dont create the real levels of anxiety experiences by real eyewitnesses in a real crime - Deffenbacher et al 2004 agreed w ts but found from a review of 34 studies; lab studies = demonstrated anxiety = reduced accuracy and that real life studies= even greater loss - these findings at odds with Christianson and Hubinette but suggest that individual diff may matter
84
A03 EWT ; flashbulb memories
These are vivid and detailed memories associated with emotionally charged and shocking events, suggesting they might be more reliable than other memories, despite the high anxiety associated with the event. -The idea of flashbulb memories contradicts the general understanding that high anxiety impairs memory, suggesting that anxiety's impact on EWT might be complex and context-dependent.
85
what composed is the cognitive interview made up of
1)mental reinstatement ; mentally recreate both the physical and psychological environment ofincident . = accessible memories . gives contextual and emotional ciues 2) report everything ; every single detail even irrelevant . coz memories are interconnected with another 3) change order ; eg reversing timelineof events , cause recollections are influenced by schemas 4) change perspective ; for eg imagining how it would appear to other witnesses as time. disrupting schemas . ts approach suggested by Anderson and Pichert
86
A03 effectiveness of cognitive interview
- meta analysis 53 studies dound an increaseof 34% in amount of correct info generated in CI compared to standard interview techniques ( Kohnken et al) - however effectiveness of CI may be due to some individual elements rather than the whole thing. Mine and Bull 2002 found that when p's were interviewed using a combo of 'report everything' and ' mental reinstatement ' components of CI= recall was bare high than just using an individual component
87
A03 issues with CI
- Kebbel and Wagstaff report issues with CI - feds say that this technique requires more time and special training, bare forces have not been able to provide more than a few hours ( Kebbel and Wagstaff),; not cost effective
88
A03 quality of CI
procedure designed to enahnce quantity of correct recall without compromising quality Kohnken et al 1999 found an 81% increase of correct info but also an 61% increase of incorrect info ( false positives ) when CI compared to standard interview - CI don't guarantee accuracy
89
What was Jacob’s study
: To investigate the capacity of short-term memory (STM). • Method: Participants were shown sequences of letters or numbers and asked to repeat them back in the correct order. The sequences increased in length until they could no longer recall them accurately. • Findings: The average span for digits was about 9.3 items, and for letters about 7.3 items. • Conclusion: STM has a limited capacity, and people can typically remember 7 ± 2 items, supporting Miller’s theory.