Midterm 1 Flashcards

1
Q

How can we make the spelling tennis ball game easier?

A

switch teams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

beginning middle and end of leading a game

A

start, solid content, close well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

play community 1-4

A

playing for fun - support each other for growth, surprises and fun!

  • emphasize teamwork and share the power
  • play is communication and communication facilitates playfulness
  • involvement and participation - access, wait time
  • integration of everyone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

facilitation vs arbitrary authority

A

making things easy for people vs commanding them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

where does power come from? 1- 5

A

relationships you establish - trust, confidence, learn from mistakes, model foolish, communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the four ps of getting a game going/ 4 p’s of facilitation

A

purpose, planning, prep, and presentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

purpose - 3

A

fun and successful
what do i want to have happen?
did i fulfill my purpose?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

planning - 1- 5 things to consider

A

every single variable - players, situation, setting, game, leader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

players 1- 5- 2

A

how many
needs, abilities, size and mix, lightning rods, culture/interests
- pos emotional experience, challenge and complexity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

situation - 1 - 3

A

context - emotional(group) and circumstance of activity
what do we need to do?
emergencies/backup plans?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

setting

A

physical environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

game - 4

A

energy, competitive vs cooperative, expressiveness, mood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

leader - 4

A

confidence, experience, support
complex/simple activity
successful performance
work together as a group - experiences between members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

overplan with flexibility - 3

A

unanticipated circumstances
# of people/gps
open to opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fail safe games - 2

A

have a few that always work/extra time

where will it fit? how it wraps up the mood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MAPP - 3

A

max activity per player - keep them engaged and try not to eliminate people
dont be detrimental to their emotions as it will be detrimental to the objective of your game as it takes away the focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Should you plan extra games?

A

yes but have flex time and just enjoy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

prep - 3

A

gathering, testing, set up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

gathering - 3

A

supplies, information of group, hip pocket list of script of order and timing (your anchor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

testing - 3

A

practice, confidence and eye contact, what ifs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

presentation -1- 5 - 2

A

recruit, focus, explain
describe, demo, ask for questions, do it, adapt it - debrief
types of learners, variation and flexibility of things if they do it too quickly/slowly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

for attention getting - 5 - optional

A
huggles 
freeze and melt
red hanky 
whisper 
noise making things
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

recruiting - 6

A

invite them
humor
enthusiasm
give them something as soon as they walk in
let them know they dont hae to be perfect
dont guilt trip

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

focussing - 4

A

flow - challenge, focus, attention, spirit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
warm ups - 2
ice breakers | changing mindsets
26
dividing teams - 4
diversity, quickly, creatively, playfully
27
explaining
over 75% of human communication is nonverbal - model what you want
28
describe - 2
info - objective | seen and heard
29
demo - 5
``` keep it splendidly simple use your players practice rounds background story safety issues ```
30
ask for questions - 2
they can observe first then join | ask a particular person what the rules are
31
adapt it - 5
``` with your players access safety novelty challenge ```
32
when you are playing multiple games - 4
warm ups are important common games to start competitive later initial games are your assessment tools
33
what is leadership - 4
inpire/promote positive change by engaging followers to exercise leadership in their own right - ambrose art of getting people to perform a task willingly - knight series of behaviours that enables a group to accomplish commonnly desired goals - ray process of exerting influence over others - eastman
34
has there been much change in the development of the definition?
no
35
business world recognized what?
leaders are required and they have certain characteristics or traits
36
you are not a leader unless
there are people following you
37
leadership vs management production
change and movement vs order and consistency | process vs end product
38
3 ideas of leadership
establish direction with a vision and set strategies aligns people - communication/commitment/teams motivates and inspires - energize, empower and satisfy
39
3 ideas of management
planning and budgeting organizing and staffing controlling and problem solving
40
does leadership or management lead to success?
neither, blending the 2
41
a productive leader - 2
leads and accomplishes goals
42
why play cooperative games? in what environments do these happen in?
experience the skills that good followers and leaders do in mostly non-threatening, mostly fun, hopefully learning environment
43
are coorperative games traditional?
no, its what you learn after you know - earl weaver
44
3 characteristics of cooperative games
infinite and finite - specific ending vs no winner or loser - rules change over time intentionally contain a certain amount of spontaneous unpredictability doesnt have all the answers/ending
45
4 elements of a successful CG
communication trust - needs to be built collaboration fun
46
4 types of CG
ice breakers initiative games - think/role play tricks and variations - thinking, team heads and tails trust
47
facilitation
increased ease of performance of any action resulting from, the continued, succesive application of necessary stim (leading or managing)
48
ease of performance - 5
``` are things easy for them? what are they accomplishing? want to make it easy for accomplishment are they doing things we intended for them to? is it beneficial? make the roles easier ```
49
necessary stim - 3
you are the stim what do you contribute? - what to do so they achieve their goals good facilitator - power not authority, control, intimidation but a stim for change
50
5 types of power
``` legit coercive reward referent expert ```
51
legit power advantage - 2 disadvantage
law/formal authority advantage - increased effectiveness of leader and clear guidelines of job disadvantage - easily abused
52
coercive power advantage disadvantage - 5
threatening punishment advantage - motivated really quickly disadvantage - high employment turnover, lose respect, no longterm use followers, less willing to bring ideas forward, lower job satisfaction
53
reward power advantage - 2 disadvantage - 2
give a reward if they do something right - tangible and intangible advantage - tangible motivates to work - increase effectiveness, intangible motivates the workplace disadvantage - tangible can run out of resources/finances, not providing the same to people
54
referent power - 4 advantage disadvantage - 4
power to influence with trust, unintentional, power because of high level of identification - admiration and respect friendly yet business like bosses wont have referent power advantage - trust in authority - decrease of obstacle disadvantage - leader expects certain behaviour, hard to change the norm, long time for trust, high employment turnover,
55
Expert power - 3 advantage - 2 disadvantage - 3
high level of knowledge or specialized skills reward and coercive or both ex used on anyone with a perceived lower level of knowledge advantage - helps you get noticed, seek your advice disadvantage - use for self, leave others, blind faith
56
conductor - 3
facilitate stimulant informant
57
how is facilitation achieved?
putting things in place that will potentially accomplish something
58
how do you know if you are facilitating? - 2
are your people accomplishing something or something that you have intended for them to accomplish?
59
What are you?
a stim - to make things easier for the group
60
what not to confuse power with/misunderstand it with - 4
manipulation authority - referent/legitimate intimidation dominance
61
timing is key - 3
be comfortable doing activities shorter/longer variations of activities how long will briefing take?
62
delegation of tasks amongst leadership team - 2
whos leading the convo? things before transition?
63
1840s
great man theory - only men had the skills to lead, some men had what it took to ascend to the leadership position (monarchy)
64
1930-40 - 2
HR approach - the way we treat people can lead them to behave in diff ways, trait theories - list of things you should have - problems - not all leaders have the same set of traits, some use good traits in a bad way
65
hawkthorne experiements -
more lightbulbs they work better? no they know they are being watched
66
1950-60
behavioural approach - use these behaviours/train for behaviours - engage, understand, apply - we dont have to be born with these
67
Blake and Mouton's Grid 1964 - 3
xy grid with x being the concern for production and y for concern for people 5 locations and type of power can use styles interchangably - continuum of strategy contingent on when and how we use different styles
68
9;1 Blake and Mouton's Grid 1 - 3
authority obedience - high task low relationships - do the work to get the job done - people are a commodity - dictates what and how to do things without concern for people
69
1;9 Blake and Mouton's Grid 1- 3
country club management - high concern for relationships - focus on followers, not exactly a stim to get things done - purpose is incidental - fostering good feelings gets primary attention
70
1;1 Blake and Mouton's Grid 1- 3
impoverished management - they dont get anything done - not a stim and no effort to make sure they are a group - min concern for either behaviour - purpose is unobtainable
71
5;5 Blake and Mouton's Grid 1-3
organization man management - position of moderation - bit of stim work to engage in task progression but not achievers or strong stim towards task completion - leader goes along to get along - results in conformity to status quo
72
9;9 Blake and Mouton's Grid 1 - 3
team management - maximize both behaviours - work and ppl are necessary of each other - leader is goal centred - seeks results through participation, commitment, and involvemnt of all who can contribute
73
masquerade technique
mask themselves as good leaders and they that they are one but are not perceived as one
74
3 criticisms of the blake and mouton grid
no established link between styles and outcomes - high in task should be more productive but that just means they are more task oriented, but not how our group will actually perform fail to find a universal style for effective leadership - hard for use to define whats effective - diff disciplines have diff characteristics implies, without empirical support that high high is most effective - diff ways to look at leaders
75
1960s
contingency theories - leadership is based on the situations
76
fiedler's contingency theory
effectiveness contingent upon relationship between leadership style (personality traits) and degree to which the situation enables the leader to exert influence (context)
77
leaders are 1 -2
oriented to a particular style - stable and not easy to change either task or relationship oriented measured by least preferred coworker scale - empathy for your least preferred team member
78
High LPC leaders
people oriented -able to have pos feelings toward a weak/nonproductive member
79
low LPC leaders
task oriented - unable to rate LP member very high
80
situational favourableness depends on 3
leader member relations - how well do followers and leaders get along - high LPC makes you more successful, low may not matter task structure - how clearly are jobs specified, performance matters position power - amt of legitimate, reward, and coercive power
81
does situation become stable?
yes, so find situations that you will be successful in
82
low LPC leaders and situations -3
do best in most and least favourable situations u shape in successful vs performance effectiveness you will have everything lined up for you or you dont care about people so it doesnt matter
83
high LPC leaders and situations - 3
do best in moderately favourable situations bigger window for opportunity to succeed moderating relationships and power intersections
84
3 controversies of fiedlers contingency theory
only 2 ways to improve leadership effectiveness change leader's persinality modify degree to which situation is favourable
85
how to modify the degree to which the situation is favourable 3-1
organization can change the situation by altering the composition of the group - leader member rules/procedures in the task situations - task structure what the leader can and cant do - position power more effective and flexible leaders
86
1970s transactional theories -
business and the relationship between the leader and the follower
87
1970s transactional and transformational theories
leaders transform and followers - do still have responsibilities
88
1980s-90s
Multidimensional model of leadership - sport and PA - encompasses all theories - well tested - strong model Antecedents - situational, leader and member characteristics Leader behaviour - required behaviour, actual behaviour, preferred behaviour Consequences - performance and satisfaction
89
leadership scale for sports 3-5
Trying to understand leaders’ behaviour - created by one of the same men that developed the MD model 40 questions to ask about scenarios and situations and understand a certain set of behaviours that will be performed by a sports leader Chelladurai and Saleh Democratic b Autocratic b - both decision making styles Social support Positive feedback - both motivation Training and instruction - task 40
90
Question set for leadership scale for sports
Did your coach do this? Do you think its required for your coach to? What would you prefer your coach do?
91
Preferred leader behaviour for age 1 -4
Chelladurai and Carron (1983) - only conclusive with these guys - male basketball in 4 age groups, gradual increase in age and level of play - preference in social support (they already have the training and skill, this will get them over that hump), automatic (want others to make decision for them so they can focus on the game, realize the value of another perspective, we don’t want to take responsibility) increased linearly - training and instruction increases then decreases for uni
92
Preferred leader behaviour and gender - 2
Chelladurai and Saleh (1978); Terry (1984) - male PE majors preferred autocratic - females preferred democratic
93
Congruence between leadership behaviour and success and performance
What will I do to affect the success and performance
94
Congruent between leader behaviours and consequences/performance - 2 studies
Van Schaik, Wilson, and Potwarka (2013) Democratic DM, Social support and positive feedback and less autocratic More likely to play playoffs Rune, Jones, and Peters (2008) Democratic DM, Training and instruction and positive feedback unsuccessful Both used CIS and both genders
95
Congruence of leader behaviour and satisfaction 1-3
Difference between actual and preferred Ieader behaviour in areas of Training and instruction (Damon, 2009) - will they listen and practice - ind athletes Pos fdbk Social support mostly affected athlete’s satisfaction Engage athletes in what they want
96
Congruence between leader behaviour and satisfaction for Weiss and Friedrichs (1986) 3
251 male ball players and their coaches - middle school basketball camp Higher rewarding behaviour, social support and democratic for high satisfaction High social support correlated with poorer performance records in younger kids Younger coaches with good win loss records with less playing experience get a high level of satisfaction - performance?
97
Summing up congruence
More research is needed for validation
98
Can we define the skills? - 2
Leader skill profiles | Trait theory
99
Peg legged pig - 3
Regardless of how good you are at being a leader there are parts that may be less than perfect Can’t define all the traits that all good leaders need to have Must interpret the followers’ feelings as a leader - followers are always thinking of feedback
100
Do we spend most of our lives leading or following?
Following :(
101
Helping to refine our skills - 4
Training Practice Experience - cant get experience and training without practice, without practice you cant get experience - best thing is to have someone take a chance on you “catch 22” Mastery
102
Why refine our skills - 2
In the end it is important to remember that we cannot become what we need to by remaining what we are Is it important to put yourself out there and practice
103
What does research say about skill development? - 4
Coaching behaviour assessment system (smith and small, 1971 uni of washington) - categorized behaviours of baseball players - coaching - organization - what do we know about the skills coaches have? - what are the coaches doing? - allow the coaches to create a better environment
104
What do coaches do? M vs F | Who did they look at?
- male coaches increase technical instruction and decrease general encouragement - female coaches decrease the technical and increase general encouragement CIS soccer coaches - wide range of gender regardless of athletes, didn’t change leader behaviour regardless
105
What do athletes want?
Players have an affinity for coaches who - improve their skills, build relationships and let them participate in decision making Cannot identify congruence between these Every leader has to make the decision of how to use the skills and abilities they have No thing that tells you what to do in diff situations
106
TART?
``` Try Assess Refine Try again ? - mastery ```
107
T for try - 4
Training/practice Free to try Learn from every leader/follower opportunity, then try them Knowledge is as powerful as you make it, no power unless you use it
108
A for assess
Feedback - use in many diff manners, each time there are diff things that occur in the same activities
109
R for refine - 2
What can you do to change the activity based on the followers? How can we change?
110
T for try again - 2
Get more experience | Practice and gain experience
111
Mastery
We never master things as a leader or follower, its about evolving to the situation