Midterm #2 Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

Define attitude

A

Evaluation of oneself, other people, events, issues, and material things with some degree of favour or disfavour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When attitudes influence behaviour

A

Attitudes are beliefs and feelings that can influence our reactions
Attitudes influence behaviour when…
- Attitude is specific to the behaviour
- External factors are taken into account
- Attitude is strongly held

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When behaviour influences attitudes

A

Sometimes we change our attitudes to match our behaviours
Example: Role-playing
- Refers to actions expected of those who occupy a particular social position
- Zimbardo’s Standford Prison Experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Role playing and the power of the situation

A

Zimbardo - Stanford Prison Study

- “What is unreal can evolve into what is real”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define compliance and give examples

A

the action or fact of complying with a wish or command. (Doing what you’re told)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Normative social influence (The need to be liked)

A

When people change their opinions or actions because they want to fit in with the group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Informational social influence (The need to be right)

A

When people change their opinions or actions because they believe that others have the information they need to make the right decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Caldini’s 6 Principles of Compliance

A
  • Commitment and Consistency; Once we agree to something we do not want to change our minds.
  • Scarcity; If something is limited in amount or time of availability, we will want it more
  • Reciprocity; If someone does something for us, we want to return the favour.
  • Social proof; We look to others’ behaviours when making our decisions.
  • Liking; We are more likely to accept something coming from someone we like.
  • Authority; If someone in authority tells us it is good, we will like it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do we coerce or persuade people to do what we want them to do?

A
  • Foot-in-the-door technique: The tendency for people who have first agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request.
  • Door-in-the-face technique: The tendency for people who have first declined a large request to comply with a smaller request.
  • Low-ball technique: People who agree to an initial request will often still comply when the requester ups the ante. People who receive only the costly request are less likely to comply with it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cognitive dissonance theory

A

Tension that arises when one is simultaneously aware of two inconsistent cognitions, as when we realize that we have acted contrary to our attitudes. (adjust our attitudes to to correspond with our actions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-perception theory

A

When unsure of our attitudes, we infer them - much as someone observing us would - by looking at our behaviour and the circumstances under which it occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conformity

A

Changing one’s perceptions, opinions, or behaviour in order to be more consistent with real or imagined group norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Obedience

A

Changes in behaviour elicited by the commands of an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Asch’s Study of Conformity

A
  • Participants judged which of three comparison lines matched the standard.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Factors found to influence conformity

A
  • Situational factors (group size, group cohesiveness, social support)
  • Personal factors (self-awareness, need for individuation, desire for personal control, desire for individualization)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Milgrim’s Obedience Experiments

A
  • Percentage of subjects complying despite the learner’s cries of protest and failure to respond
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain each of the four factors determined obedience

A
  • Emotional distance of the victim: distant/depersonalized (learner in the room vs. not seen)
  • Closeness and legitimacy of the authority: physical presence of experimenter (phone vs. in room)
  • Institutional authority: Yale vs. Bridgeport
  • The liberating effects of group influence: First responders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Persuasion

A

The action or fact of persuading someone or of being persuaded to do or believe something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

2 routes to persuasion

A
  • Central route: involved, motivated, thinking systematically, focusing on arguments
  • Peripheral route: uninvolved, distracted, cues that trigger acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

3 elements of persuasion

A
  • The communicator: credibility, sleeper effect, attractiveness
  • The message: central vs. peripheral
  • The audience: personality characteristics, life-cycle explanation (attitudes change as people get older), generational explanation (change in generations)
21
Q

Resisting persuasion?

A
  • Forewarned is forearmed

- Be involved, critical thinkers

22
Q

Resisting persuasion?

A
  • Forewarned is forearmed

- Be involved, critical thinkers

23
Q

Define indoctrination (examples)

A

A process, used by a number of social groups, to teach members a partisan and uncritical acceptance of the group’s perspective on issues.

24
Q

How social psychological principles explain indoctrination

A
  • Attitudes follow behaviour (compliance breeds acceptance)

- Persuasive elements (communicator, message, audience)

25
Philip Zimbardo's research on cults
- Individuals do not join "cults" - Reflect society's "default values" - "If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything" - Everyone is vulnerable under different conditions.
26
Know how to tell if your group is a cult...
- Alternatives being provided or taken away - One's access to new and different information being broadened or denied? - Personal responsibility vs. group as its leader
27
Attitude Strength
Strong attitudes are more likely to lead to behaviour than weak attitudes
28
Information Processing Biases
The way in which attitudes are formed impacts how easily we are influenced - Exposure: environmental pollution - Attention: pay more attention to information we believe in - Perception: encoding of information - Judgement: conclusions about the meaning or relevance of information - Memory: recall and recognition of attitude relevant info
29
Factors that enable us to resist social pressure
- Reactance: boomerang effect (boy/girl your family doesn't want you to date) - Asserting uniqueness: unique, individuality, different - Attitude inoculation: exposure to weak attacks in order to prepare for stronger attacks
30
Implications of social influence
- active listener - critical thinker - counter argue - ineffective persuasion is often counterproductive - don't just listen, react!
31
Social facilitation original meaning (Triplett)
- perform simple or well-learned tasks better when others are present - problem: couldn't explain why some people performed more poorly in the presence of others
32
Robert Zajonc (arousal and dominant responses)
- genetically predisposed to arousal - arousal enhances whatever behaviour is dominant - for well-learned tasks: the correct responses are the dominant responses. "Home team 'adavntage' only works when the team is already having a good season."
33
Social facilitation (current meaning)
The strengthening of dominant responses in the presence of others.
34
How crowd size can effect
- A large audience can interfere with well-learned, automatic behaviour - Being in a crowd intensifies positive or negative reactions
35
Why are we aroused in the presence of others?
- Evaluation apprehension: concern for how others are evaluating us - Distraction: concern for the presence of others distracts us - Mere presence: some arousal occurs even without evaluation apprehension
36
Social loafing
The tendency for people to exert less effort when they pool their efforts toward a common goal than when they are individually accountable
37
Free-rider
People who benefit from the group but give little in return
38
When people are less likely to social loaf when...
- The task is challenging - The task is appealing - The task is involving - Members in the group are friends - in collectivist cultures
39
Deindividuation
When arousal and diffused responsibility combine - Abandon normal restraints - Lose their sense of individual identity - Become responsive to group or crowd norms
40
What elicits deindividuation?
- Group size - Physical anonymity - Arousing and distracting activities - Diminished self-awareness
41
The risky shift phenomenon (examples)
Why groups are more cautious than individuals (James Stoner) | - groups make riskier decisions than individuals
42
Group polarization (examples)
Group-produced enhancement of members' preexisting tendencies whether risky or cautious - a better describer because involves both risk and caution in groups
43
Group polarization in... - law courts - communities - on the internet - in cults - terrorist groups
- Republican judges more conservative with other republican appointees than with democratic ones - Gang delinquency, "landslide" elections - Virtual communities, electronic chat rooms - Shared grievances, isolated from moderating influences
44
Groupthink
"The mode of thinking that persons engage in when concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive in-group that it tends to override realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action"
45
Causes and consequences of group think
- an amiable, cohesive group - relative isolation of the group from dissenting viewpoints - a directive leader who signals what decision he or she favours
46
Symptoms of group think
- tend to overestimate might & right (illusion of invulnerability, unquestioned belief in the group's morality) - members become close minded (rationalization, stereotyped view of opponent) - pressures towards uniformity (conformity pressure, self-censorship, illusion of unanimity, mind guards)
47
Preventing groupthink
- Be impartial - Encourage critical evaluation - Subdivide group and reunite to air differences - Welcome critiques from outside experts - Call a "second chance" meeting
48
Minority influence
- Individuals can influence their groups (Rosa Parks) - Consistency (don't flip/flop) - Self-confidence (confidence can sway people) - Defections from the majority (one-time members of majority group viewed as more persuasive when they become members of the minority)