MOCK QUESTIONS Flashcards
CASE STUDY: At the point in time where you advised a £10k PSUM, do you think that was reasonable? What was this envisaged to cover?
This was envisaged to cover unknowns from the remaining survey results.
It was believed to be sufficient as in house project data at the same campus suggested results from similar surveys and indicated this would be sufficient.
Perhaps in the future this may have to be revised but it was recognised as a risk.
CASE STUDY: What was the cost limit and who produced it? Who produced the cost limit?
Cost limit was set at £1.025m
CASE STUDY: You said the funding was £1.02m, what did this include for, does this mean there is £700k of fees and surveys?
There was £150k prof fees
£25,000 allowance for planning
£125,000 client direct cost for the migration and decant for the relocation of the specialist equipment
£90,000 contingency
CASE STUDY: Why was a JCT D&B chosen?
Contractor involvement: specialist Demolition contractor
Earlier start on site
Risk transfer to the contractor, amended to maintain ERs
Client most familiar with this contract type
CASE STUDY: Can you give me any other examples of VE/Scope reduction that was explored?
SR: omit demolition of one of the buildings, omit the works in the badger exclusion zone altogether
VE: Difficult to come up with VE for demolition project, smaller plant etc but all these had been previously explored
CASE STUDY: What is the risk of VE?
The risk is that it may not always offer a cost saving, just add value. Is not always about finding the cheapest option. Also dependent on project, may not be any suitable alternatives. Dependent on entire project team being aware of potential VE.
CASE STUDY: How was responsibility of noise captured contractually, i.e. why is it contractually the client’s fault?
Prelims
CASE STUDY: Why was meeting the completion date; even by 4 days, such a big factor to the client?
Expiry of the badger licence
University Campus being live
Handover for new build
CASE STUDY: What is programme float?
Time built in around the critical path that can be utilised instead of an extension of time in the event of a delay.
CASE STUDY: Why was there limited float in the programme?
Due to the requirement of the site being handed over
CASE STUDY: Why didn’t you propose doing sectional completion, why partial possession?
Already in the contract
CASE STUDY: What types of thing would you expect to see in a standard acceleration quotation?
You would typically expect to see labour quant and costs, weekend working hours and the cost, any additional plant hire etc
OH&P on top
1. Revised Project Schedule:
It will detail how the contractor plans to achieve the earlier completion date(s).
2. Explanation of Acceleration Methods:
3. Price Adjustment:
The quotation must include the financial implications of the acceleration, which is typically an increase in the total cost.
This will detail the additional costs associated with the acceleration measures (e.g., overtime, extra labor, equipment rental).
It should be transparent and clearly explain how the additional cost is calculated.
Any additional info and concessions
CASE STUDY: How did you provide your advice to the client in regards to acceleration?
I advised my client initially that they may not be taking the most suitable approach.
With regards to the EOT, stoppages for noise would only be a relevant event if the contractor had not complied with the contractual requirements for noisy working.
With this project, this may not have been the case. The client had been responsible for some of the accumulated delay. This was therefore a risk that it may not have been an EOT or vice versa.
I advised acceleration may not be the best route however my client was keen to take this approach. Therefore I advised the cost of the acceleration was fair and in line with the rates in the contract.
CASE STUDY: What happens if the contractor accelerates but the completion date is not met, are LAD’s applicable?
Yes, acceleration does not contractually change the completion date. If the contractor does not meet the completion date, the employer would be able to issue notice of non completion and charge LADs.
CASE STUDY: What does VFM mean to clients?
Value for money means the client is meeting their requirements at the highest value for the cost. Getting the most for their money.
CASE STUDY: If you could go back and change any of the options selected what would you change in your approach?
I personally would not change any of my options. I would in the future strongly advise acquiring full planning permission prior to tender to limit the chances of these occurring.
CONSTRUCTION TECH: on the NCDH when doing cost benefit analysis, what did you advise the client in regards to the benefits of timber frame to the others? What was the building? Was timber really applicable/worth looking at?
CONSTRUCTION TECH: when doing the cost comparison on Loughborough library, what considerations did you make to the options, and how did you price them? - also how did you price modular?
PROCUREMENT AND TENDERING: On the DMU energy centre how did you ensure a like for like comparison process?
I did this by initially carrying out a basic arithmetical check to check for any key noticeable errors in the tender.
I would then produce a tender reconciliation document to compare the returned pricing documents line for line to be able to carry out a like for like comparison.
I would produce a tender clarification log for each tenderer to clarify any errors, noticeable differences in pricing, clarify where items are missing or any other queries that may have come apparent from the tender return and review period.
This enables a fair comparison to be made and ensure a like for like comparison is made before making any commercial recommendations.
PROCUREMENT AND TENDERING: on the le gros clark project, why did you suggest an enabling works contract? What other methods are available? - why not an LOI? Why not a 2 stage tender with PCSA and early works?
The funding was separated and the contracts were separated in accordance with this. The reason was the client had a strip out contractor they were familiar with and wanted to use. I would not advise using a letter of intent and two stage can sometimes not be suited. This would also speed up the time meaning construction could start whilst design was still progressing so overall, possession of site could be met earlier.
PROCUREMENT AND TENDERING: on the NCDh project, how did you decide on the 60/40 quality cost ratio?
For this project, the client had requirements of net zero sustainability and overall wanted to ensure the contractor, due to the specialist nature of some of the works, and the requirement of innovations and sustainable construction techniques, had the desired capabilities. It is a similar prinicple to changes to the procurement act, my client wanted to prioritise both quality, value for money as well as cost - MEAT TO MAT
More holistic
PROCUREMENT AND TENDERING: on NCDH, what questions/parameters were analysed as part of the qualitative assessment? - and why?
Quality-focused tender questions aim to assess a supplier’s ability to consistently deliver high-quality goods or services, often including aspects like service delivery, workmanship, and materials
Questions that were analysed:
Previous project experience
CVs
Sustainable innovations and VE proposals.
Any BIM or innovative technologies that have/use
Health and Safety
Risk Management
Quality Assurance
Environmental monitoring etc
PROJECT FINANCE: “4. What is loss and expense”
“a. Costs incurred not claimable anywhere else such as variations. No retention is taken on loss and expense”
QUANTIFICATION AND COSTING: What document defines how buildings are measured globally?
International Property Measurement Standards