Module 1 - Kinesiology and Science Flashcards
(46 cards)
What are the 3 departments in the Faculty of Health?
The School of Public Health Sciences, Dept. of Kinesiology + Health Sciences, Dept. of Recreation + Leisure Studies
What are the 5 programs offered by the Faculty of Health?
Health Sciences, Public Health, Kinesiology, Recreation + Sport Business, Therapeutic Recreation, Recreation + Leisure Studies
Kinesiology
The study of human movement
Kinematics
The study of motion
Kinetics
The study of forces that cause motion
Kinesthesia
Sense of movement
What is the difference between the discipline and the profession?
- Discipline: the science of kinesiology itself
- Profession: registered kinesiologist, involves a scope of practice (assessment of human movement + performance, its rehabilitation + management to maintain, rehabilitate, or enhance movement + performance)
Minors + specializations offered by Dept. of Kinesiology + Health Sciences (3A, 3B, 4A, 4B)
- Neuroscience minor (Sept. 1, 2024)
- Ergonomics + injury prevention minor
- Human nutrition minor
- Medical physiology minor
- Rehabilitation sciences specialization
How do you know what is “true”?
- Be aware that some researchers paid to present misleading information
- Studies tracking a larger # of people –> more date + more accurate results
- Look at a variety of sources for a well-rounded understanding
The Scientific Process
- Make observation/review previous research
- Formulate question
- Formulate hypothesis (educated guess based on previous knowledge)
- Design experiment
- Execute experiment
- Analyze results
- Draw conclusion
- Formulate new hypothesis
What if results of your research do not support your hypothesis?
- Confirmation OR refutation of a hypothesis are both valuable outcomes
- Science sets out to determine TRUTH; does not set out to PROVE
- Seek TRUTH not PROOF
Confirmation bias
- Tendency for individuals to search for, select and/or interpret information in a way that serves to confirm their beliefs/hypotheses
- Leads to disregarding information that challenges their beliefs/hypotheses
Importance of evidence
- Accumulation of results from many studies serve to inform what is ‘true’
- Singular studies not enough (multiple studies, locations, researchers coming to the same conclusion –> reinforce ‘truth’)
- Anecdotes are not enough + often influenced by confirmation bias
- Bad science/’pseudo-science’ can be intentionally/unintentionally misleading
- Accumulation of knowledge is important + takes time
Peer-reviewed scientific publications
- Quality control
- Valid, high quality, original
- Also called scholarly, academic, refereed
Primary article (empirical study)
- Aims to gain new knowledge through direct/indirect observation + research
- Quantitative/qualitative data + analysis
- Often include sections –> intro, methods, results, discussion (IMRaD)
Review article
- Summary of existing research in a field/topic area
- Several types: narrative reviews, scoping reviews, systematic reviews
Narrative reviews
- Summarizes some of existing evidence
- Overviews, describes, + synthesizes topic
- Can be more biased
Scoping reviews
- Broad reviews, aim to gather as much evidence as possible + map evidence into themes
- Describe methodology, what do search + how (to remove biases)
Systematic reviews
- Highly structured reviews that utilize pre-planned methods to include/exclude articles
- Describe methodology, what do search + how (to remove biases)
Meta-analysis journal articles
- Secondary analysis
- Combines and/or analyzes data from different primary studies (usually) in new analysis tp strengthen understanding of particular topic
- Taking completed studies + analyzing them together
Case studies
- Report specific instances of interesting phenomena
- Goal: to make other researches aware of possibility that a specific phenomenon might occur
- Often used in medicine to report occurrence of a previously unknown/emerging pathologies
RADAR Framework
- Relevance: support ideas with pertinent info
- Authority: judging credibility of author’s assertions
- Date: currency, info can quickly become obsolete, supporting research with superseded facts weakens your argument
- Appearance + Accuracy: sources are identifiable through appearance + context clues, important b/c errors + untruths distorts line of reasoning, presenting inaccurate info undermines your credibility
- Reason: sources made to serve a purpose (some are frivolous/commercial; provide inaccurate, false, biased info), varied points of view can be valid if based on good reasoning + careful use of evidence
Steps to reading a paper
Skim, first (second…) detailed read, review data, summarize
Structure of a paper
Title, abstract, intro, methods, results, discussion, references