Module 5 Flashcards
(75 cards)
When does a dual relationship occur?
- When psych engages in another significant, meaningful relationship with the client in addition to the professional relationship.
- May occur simultaneously with, or after the termination of, the professional relationship.
What are 4 types of multiple relationships?
- Non-professional relationship with client (friend, family member)
- Different professional relationship with the client (work colleague, tenant)
- Non-professional relationship with associated party (client’s best friend, sibling)
- Recipient of service provided by client (client is also your GP, psychologist, or masseuse etc.)
What are 3 problems associated with MRs?
- Unequal power relationship (client vulnerability / potentially exploitative or harmful)
- Conflict of interest
- Objectivity may be compromised
Why can the term ‘relationship’ be confusing with regarding MR’s?
- Incidental or accidental contacts (unintended or brief interactions with a client outside of the therapy context); and,
- Boundary crossings (benign, constructive interactions with a client that cross the traditional external boundaries that frame the therapeutic relationship)
What’s the difference between boundary crossing and entering a MR with a client?
Boundary crossings become behaviours in a MR when the professional assumes another role in another relationship with the client
What are 3 examples of boundary crossing?
- Crying in front of a client
- Attending a client’s special event
- Disclosing a personal stressor to a client
List some types of boundaries
Role Time Place and Space Money Gifts Services Clothing Language Self-disclosure Physical contact
How much does the purist and psychoanalyst disclose?
Nothing
If you were to enter into another relationship with a client, what are 3 things you should do before-hand?
- Be aware of client vulnerability and the potential for exploitation
- Conflict of interest - develop a plan to minimise harm
- Ensure your objectivity is not compromised
Are boundary crossings unethical?
Not necessarily however can lead to boundary violations (unethical)
What has blurring of boundaries been considered a precursor to?
Later major transgressions (i.e. boundary violations).
Give on example of how a boundary crossing can quickly turn into a boundary violation
Doing a home visit for an elderly person (acceptable boundary crossing), but then staying for dinner (boundary violation)
How might unavoidable MR’s be dealt with in therapy?
Informed consent at beginning of session
What is a boundary crossing?
Departures from commonly accepted practice; descriptive term (neither laudatory nor perjorative)
What is a boundary violation?
Major transgressions ( to the client’s disadvantage)
What did Gottlieb and Younggren (2009) report regarding the frequency with which minor boundary crossings lead to a major boundary violation?
Exaggerated. They suggest the slope is less steep and less slippery for most practitioners.
Gottlieb and Younggren (2009): Why was the terminology changed from ‘dual relationships’ to ‘multiple relationships’?
More accurately reflected the complexity of contemporary practice by emphasising that practitioners could have a variety of relationships with the same client
Gottlieb and Younggren (2009): What was Guntheil & Gabbard’s notion of the slippery slope? (contested by G & Y, authors)
Gradual process, abstracted from physics in which sexual acts where preceeding by a series of boundary crossings that did not have negative results per se; rather each had a desensitising effect that made the next boundary crossing easier
Implied that the practitioner was unaware and that at some point the momentum of previous boundary crossings would force the practitioner into a boundary violation.
Gottlieb and Younggren (2009): What are the 2 components of Berry’s model?
- Maintenence - degree to which student the ethical and value traditions of their culture of origin
- Contact and participation - degree to which students adopted the norms and values of their new professional culture
Gottlieb and Younggren (2009): What happens if students are high on both maintenence and contact & participation?
They use an ‘integration strategy’
Best possible choice - students can incorporate ethical values of psychology and maintain their personal values.
(Gottlieb and Younggren): What are the 4 strategies of ethical acculturation? Which is most likely to lead one down the slippery slope of boundary crossing?
- Integration (high maintenance of personal values, high contact/participation with new culture of psychology)
- Separation (high maintenance, low contact, more likely to make decisions based on personal values
- Assimilation (low maintenance, high contact)
- Marginalisation (low maintenance, low contact, most likely to go down slippery slope)
(Gottlieb and Younggren): How might someone using ‘separation’ strategy behave?
May be more likely to make professional decisions based on personal values, believing they do not need additional rules to govern their professional behaviour.
(Gottlieb and Younggren): Is someone using the ‘separation’ strategy likely to commit boundary violation ?
Unlikely due to strong personal cultural values
(Gottlieb and Younggren): What does ‘assimilation’ refer to?
Low maintenance, high contact
Refers to overidentification with professional standards to the extent that that practitioners may lose many of their own personal values.
In effort to develop professional identities, students may divorce themselves from personal values in the belief they are no longer necessary.