module 7 Flashcards
(30 cards)
line of duty decisions
- police officers will encounter critical incidents that cause a physiological stress response:
- unpredictable
- potentially uncontrollable
- novel
- time-pressured
- sometimes life-or-death
use of force: CCC 25(1)
- “everyone who is required or authorized by law to do anything in the administration or enforcement of the law
- as a private person
- as a peace officer or public officer
- in aid of a peace officer or public officer
- by virtue of his office
- if he acts on reasonable grounds, justified in doing what he is required or authorized to do and in using as much force as is necessary for that purpose
use of force: CCC 25(4)
- a police officer “is justified in using force that is intended or is likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to a person to be arrested, if:
- the peace officer is proceeding lawfully to arrest, with or without warrant, the person to be arrested
- the offence for which the person is to be arrested is one for which that person may be arrested without warrant
- the person to be arrested takes flight to avoid arrest
- the peace officer or other person using the force believes on reasonable grounds that the force is necessary for the purpose of protecting the peace officer, the person lawfully assisting the peace officer or any other person from imminent or future death or grievous bodily harm
- the flight cannot be prevented by reasonable means in a less violent manner.”
reasonableness standard
- this means that use of lethal force must be
- proportionate to the threat the officer had reasonable grounds to believe they faced
- necessary to protect themselves or others from death or grievous bodily harm
- reasonable from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene (without hindsight bias b/c it is difficult after the fact)
- allow for being forced to make a split-second decision regarding the amount of force necessary
use of force options available
- gun
- taser
- baton
- pepper spray
- handcuffs
- own body (stroke/punches)
use of force rates - study
- a longitudinal study of a large Canadian police service over 9 years found:
- police responded to 24,605,000 incidents
- 0.07% of police incidents involved use of force
- there were 17,155 use of force incidents, during which 22,155 interventions were used
- more often use of force is avoided in other ways such as verbal de-escalation, stance, way they present themselves or handle themselves
percentage of each rate of force
- 1.2% discharge firearm
- 2.5% baton
- 14% conducted energy weapon
- 22.9% OC spray
- 22.7% takedown
- 1.5% vascular neck restraint
- 35.2% stuns/strikes
national use of force model (Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police - 2000) basic principles
- the primary responsibility of a peace officer is to preserve and protect life
- the primary objective of any use of force is to ensure public safety
- police officer safety is essential to public safety
- the National Use of Force Framework does not replace or augment the law; the law speaks for itself
- the National Use of Force Framework was constructed in consideration of (federal) statute law and current case law
- the National Use of Force Framework is not intended to dictate policy to any agency
considerations when assessing use of force - the situation
- the situations is made up of:
- the environment (weather)
- number of subjects (risk assessment; 1v1?)
- perceived subjects’ abilities
- knowledge of subject (previous runs ins, relationship)
- time and distance
- potential attack signs
considerations when assessing use of force - subject behaviours
- very meaningful in decision making
- cooperative (impacted by emotional expression)
- resistant (Passive)
- resistant (Active)
- assaultive
- grievous bodily harm or death
research of use of force decisions
- research has examined the impact of:
- experience
- officer characteristics (e.g. POST dimensions they have or don’t have)
- stress response (e.g. Yerkes-Dodson Law)
- training
assessing the situation - experience
- expert/experienced officers tend to provide:
- more concrete, intricate details of events
- more explanations and predictions of what is happening or might occur
- identify and process cures faster, allowing more timely development of
- results suggest differences between novice and expert police officers in speed with which they develop an understanding of situations to inform appropriate judgements
decision making - experience
- decision-making and judgement of experienced individuals tends to be more:
- effective
- efficient
- accurate
cognitive process of decision making
- emotional reactivity to a particular stimulus provides information regarding how (not what) they are understanding and thinking about the stimulus
- thoughts are often automatic
- a person can start with emotionality and work backward to recognize thoughts
- situation → thoughts → emotions → behaviour
emotion - experience
- compared to novice police officers, experienced police officers:
- used more positively valenced language
- used more low arousal language (stronger effect with action-decisions and with more rapid decision responses)
- use higher dominance (control) language
- unfamiliar stimuli typically elicit more arousal and are perceived more negatively b/c repeated exposure allows for habituation of non-threatening stimuli
recognition-primed decision-making
- under dynamic and complex circumstances, experienced decision-makers can quickly assess situations and draw on their schemas to evaluation options and determine the first workable solution
- resilient to stress and more adaptable to complex and dynamic situations b/c more policing experience is related to flexible decision-making, anticipation, cue recognition, and reduced use of force
performance - experience
- police officers’ years of experience
- NOT associated with performance metrics
- IS associated with increased decision-making errors
officer characteristics associated with increased use of force:
- lower education level
- impulsivity
- low tolerance for boredom
- overly sensitive to provocation
- rigidly authoritarian style
- ineffective coping
- cumulative stress
police officers are more likely to use excessive force when they hold the following attitudes:
- belief that “real” police work consists of action-oriented enforcement
- belief that there are too many restrictions that prevent them from battling crime
- belief that only other patrol officers are qualified to evaluate excessive vs. necessary force
- belief that citizens will be hostile and exploitative if not “taught respect”
threat response
- physiological response to perceived threats (aka fight or flight) that promotes survival by preparing physiologically and cognitively to adapt to demands of the situation
- the level of sympathetic nervous system response depends on the type of threat and the person’s perception of how severe the threat is
the heroes-dodson law
- impact of SNS arousal on performance in not linear
- stress-induced deficits primarily affect cognitive functions
- perception
- attention
- decision-making
- motor functions can also be impacted
- rehearsed and automated skills influenced by stress response to lesser degree (overlearning) → are not things we need to process or make decisions about
stress reactivity
- elevated stress reactivity observed during a training scenario (physiological measures)
- stress reactivity associated with perceptual and cognitive distortions:
- auto-pilot
- tunnel vision (blood flow to eye vessels restricted)
- heightened visual clarity
- diminished sound (auditory exclusions)
stress reactivity x training
- no significant effect of training on physiological stress response and the perceptual and cognitive distortions (related to psychological response)
- police officers with higher levels of operational skills training demonstrated better performance
performance
- training x experience x stress reactivity
- together explain approximately one quarter of the variance in performance
- affect performance if we continue with training and experience, but still a lot of other factors that explain the other 3/4