module 8 Flashcards
(28 cards)
potentially traumatic events
- any incident that involves the threat of sexual violence, serious harm, or death
- the threat can be direct or indirect
- inevitable in policing
- impact is individual and related to interpretations of the event
direct potentially traumatic event
- personally experiencing a PTE
- witnessing a PTE as it occurs to others
indirect potentially traumatic event
- being exposed to a PTE through a source other than directly experiencing or witnessing it
- e.g. being told about an event, reading about or seeing images about an event
perceptions of most to least traumatic PTEs
- first on scene
- responding to the scene but not first
- managing a scene
- repeated exposure over time, no “anchor event”
- indirect exposure
- unsupported and old trauma
anchor event
anchor events would have strong emotional or psychological impact and often serves as a reference point for future reactions and thoughts
PTSD criteria A
- “exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence in one (or more) of the following ways:
- directly experiencing the traumatic event(s).
- witnessing, in person, the event(s) as it occurred to others.
- learning that the traumatic event(s) occurred to a close family member or close friend. In cases of actual or threatened death of a family member or friend, the event(s) must have been violent or accidental.
- experiencing repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of the traumatic event(s) (e.g. first responders collecting human remains; police officers repeatedly expose to details of child abuse).”
direct trauma exposure
- officer-involved shooting
- life-threatening incident
- witnessing death (violent or accidental)
- serious assault
- explosion or fire
- line of duty death
indirect trauma exposure
- deceased people (violent or accidental)
- harm to children
- witnessing human suffering
- details at a scene
- explosion or fire
- line of duty death
top 5 dangerous officer calls where police homicide is most likely to occur
- investigating a robbery
- domestic dispute
- investigating firearms complaint
- stopping suspicious person or vehicle
- traffic violation
line of duty deaths
- not common in Canada, however there is ways the potential regardless of the type of call
potential impact of PTEs
- not wanting to respond to calls
- accumulation of trauma and stress over time
- maladaptive coping mechanisms (e.g. substances)
- respond differently (e.g. become more reactive or have increased hesitation)
- interpretation of threats as more or less severe
- general decline in mental health
impact of trauma
- negative cognitions
- avoidance
- approach
negative cognitions
- shifts in beliefs/thoughts about themselves, others, and the world that are often distorted
- consistent with criterion D of PTSD diagnostic criteria
negative cognition: danger/risk
- elevated perceptions of risk (e.g. interpretations of threats)
- danger-focused thoughts (e.g. where are the escape routes? What is someone’s real intention?)
- related uncontrollable physiologic response (e.g. fight or flight symptoms)
- catastrophizing
negative cognition: control
- excessive sense of personal responsibility for events
- self-scrutiny and self-blame over negative outcomes
- fails to account for the complexity and competing factors of an event (focused on their role not the external contributions and situation as a whole)
- some have a sense of helplessness or lack of control (less common)
negative cognition: humanity
- change in assumptive beliefs about the fundamental goodness of people
- cynicism about humanity (causes increased positive views on use of force)
- meaningful changes in thoughts about others’ motivations and intentions (e.g. perceive manipulation, harmful or self-serving intentions more often)
avoidance
- consistent with criterion C of the PTSD diagnostic criteria: persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning after the traumatic event(s) occurred
- e.g. avoiding where the event occurred, similar types of calls, talking about it, etc
avoidance: engagement withdrawal
- avoid dangerous or distressing events
- limit/avoid discretionary activities involving public contact
- withdraw from proactive policing activities (creates opportunity for something to happen again)
avoidance: emotional distancing
- psychologically distancing from the work
- psychologically distancing from the people they interact with on the job
- psychological and emotional distancing can be perceived as callousness by others
- can lead to dehumanization of groups of people (e.g. high risk lifestyles vs. children)
- dehumanization can protect officers from psychological impact and maintain their belief in a ‘just world’
approach: defensive
- engage with the public with the assumption of negative intention , which is related to the negative cognitions regarding safety/risk
- can lead to tenser, more aggressive interactions that escalate the situation
approach: rigid enforcement
- related to belief that more rigid enforcement (perception of control) could prevent further negative outcomes
- creates meaning and purpose in their work amid senselessness death and violence (perceive decreased risk from rigid enforcement)
- negatively related to acceptable use of officer discretion
PTSD criteria
- intrusions
- avoidance of stimuli
- negative alterations in conditions and mood
- alterations in arousal and reactivity
intrusions as a PTSD criteria
unwanted thoughts, memories, or feelings associated with a traumatic event
avoidance of stimuli as a PSTD criteria
avoiding thoughts, feelings, and even external reminders like people, places, or objects that evoke distress