module two Flashcards
(28 cards)
identifying social contexts
- understandings of the self are embedded within social contexts → subjectivities
- subjectivities exist at both the personal and generational levels
- how we understand ourselves ebbs and flows as we shift across social contexts and interact with different groups
subjectivities
- replaces identity in reference to the connection that exists between our understanding of self and social contexts
- similarities in socialization = possible similarities in subjectivities
4 components of subjectivities
- ideal self
- actual self
- possibilities
- biographical problems
ideal self
who you aspire to be
actual self
who you actually are right now
possibilites
characteristic/aspects of social context that enable one to envision that ideal self and makes you think achieving that ideal is possible
biographical problems
elements of the social context/larger society that serve as obstacles you need to overcome to achieving your ideal self
transition from early to late modernity
- pre-modern era
- first/early modernity
- second/late modernity
pre-modern era/pre-industrial era
- social change is slow
- identity as a given; do exactly what their parents do
- past approaches as a guide for current success & survival
first/early modernity
- industrialization; changes are occurring
- nation-states with clear, cohesive control = certainty and social stability
- identity involves some choice because industrialization = complex division of labour
second/late modernity
- rapidly increasing pace of globalization
- nonstop social change
- fragmentation of nation-states
- adaptability, flexibility and personal responsibility
- identity is acquired
identity in second/late modernity
identity in late modernity means governing the self in a risk society characterized by structures and processes of individualization
risk society
- The pace of social change and uncertainty as a constant = ongoing risk
- e.g. will AI do my job instead of me in 10 years
- navigate uncertainty by governing the self; the only thing you can control in this world is yourself and the choices you make
individualization
increasingly define their lives and identities independently of traditional social structures and norms because of rapid social change
3 components of individualization
- disembedding
- loss of security
- re-embedding
disembedding
- liberation from tradition
- what we gain from social change because of a breakdown of old traditional frameworks that previously structured people’s lives
- driven by globalization, technological advancements and social change
loss of security
- disenchantment
- what we lose because of social change
- increased responsibility of choices about life = loss of security and contributes to uncertainty
re-embedding
- practices of reintegration
- how we respond to “disembedding” and “loss of security”
- understanding who you are, what we will do and who we will be
why are both school and time on the land significant for Indigenous youth?
- the land is often linked to family and traditions while school is connected to success and futures
- the Inuit of Nunavut talk about how time spent on the land are times ‘out of time’ and where generations within families and communities connect and pass down knowledge from their shared heritage
- indigenous communities have long histories of experiencing exploitation and marginalization connected to Western education
what is structured violence
- structural violence is one way of describing social arrangements that put individuals and populations in harm’s way
- considered structural because they are embedded in the political and economic organization of the social world
how does structural violence manifest
manifests when there is an unequal balance of power, which skews the distribution of resources and opportunities in favour of a dominant group and then reproduces inequalities in health, economic status, political power, etc
What are some of the school-related cultural practices that impose structural violence
- the ‘hidden curriculum’ of Western schools propagates and teaches adherence to white dominant culture values, practices and worldviews
- sites of strength and traditional learning (i.e. the land) are largely divorced from government sponsored secondary education
- there is often little acknowledgment of historical violence enacted on indigenous communities
to what extent are caregivers involved in the research participants’ school lives
while many young people stated their general belief is that parents want them to be ‘successful’ in school, very few young people in either site discussed caregivers of having any significant involvement in their schooling
how do the values that underlie conflict resolution (e.g., bullying) vary between school and home
- young people find themselves in a dilemma where if they address conflict in a way that makes sense locally, they will face negative repercussions at school
- solving through aggression vs. school policy