Napoleon's impact on France 1799-1815 Flashcards
(57 cards)
Details of the making of the Constitution of the year VIII, including Napoleon’s adjustments
o Napoleon, Sieyes and Ducos were the newly elected provisional consuls, and swore an oath of allegiance to the republic on 10th November
o Napoleon overruled Sieyes on many matters: Sieyes wanted the First Consul to mainly be a figurehead, but Napoleon wanted him to be head of state with complete control, in peace and in war, at home and abroad, and he insisted that he would occupy this role. Sieyes wanted the second and third consuls to have voix deliberative (an equal voice in any decision making) but Napoleon wanted them only to have voix consultative (the right only to express an opinion)
o Napoleon issued a proclamation about the new constitution, stating that it was ‘founded on the true principles of representative government and on the sacred rights or property, equality and liberty’
How was the Constitution of the year VIII enlightened?
o The electoral system provided the basis for universal suffrage and was a feature of the constitution proposed by Sieyes: 6 million ‘Frenchmen of the age of 21 with a year’s domicile’ were named as voters – no longer property/wealth based (no financial limits on who can be a citizen)
o Presence of second and third consul still mean that power is somewhat checked
o Members of both the Legislature and the Tribunal were renewed by a fifth each year, preventing one group of people from becoming too dominant
o Existence of the Legislature and Tribunal to discuss/vote on laws was in itself a check to the consul’s power (ie Napoleon couldn’t just make laws)
o Constitution theoretically put in place by the people as a plebiscite was held to show support
How was the Constitution of the year VIII not enlightened? (limited franchise)
o Despite the franchise being enlarged to six million men, these men were only tasked with choosing 10% of their number to form a communal list (from whom local officials would be drawn), so the system was so indirect that the idea of popular sovereignty was a façade. From the communal list a departmental list was chosen (another 10%) who in turn formed a national list of notables, or ‘persons fit for public service’
How was the constitution not enlightened? (limited powers of representative bodies)
The representation in government was both incredibly indirect, and very limited in itself. The Tribunate, for example, which consisted of 100 men over 25 selected from the national list, could discuss legislation but not actually vote on it.
And members of the Legislature, whilst they could vote on legislation, weren’t allowed to discuss it. So the separation of legislative authority at lower levels was designed to limit popular sovereignty, and the concentration of authority at the very top was intended to give Napoleon dictatorship-like power.
Napoleon turned the Senate into an instrument of his personal power, whereas Sieyes intended for it to act as a brake on the executive – he continually expanded the Senate and packed it with his personal supporters through making direct nominees
How was the constitution not enlightened? (power of the First Consul)
o The First Consul had the power to choose both the 30-40 Council of State (who nominated officials and helped implement legislation) and the 60 members-for-life of the Senate (who appointed the Legislature and Tribunate, and also had power over some acts). So power very concentrated at the top.
o The First Consul initiates all legislation, can appoint and dismiss government ministers, can declare war and peace, and holds office for 10 years
Details of the 1800 plebiscite
o A plebiscite was held in February 1800 because under the Law of Brumaire, the new constitution had to be ‘submitted to the acceptance of the French people’.
o Modern historians have calculated that the turnout was roughly 25% (1.5 million) but Lucien as Minister of the Interior adjusted the statistics to suggest that 46.26% participated with the following results…
o The result was 99.94% for and 0.06% against but multiple factors mean that it wasn’t necessarily an accurate depiction of popular opinion: the ballot was open (so intimidation and malpractice was common).
o However, once the government were made aware of the problem of possible later victimisation, they promised to burn the lists when the votes had been counted. (though this promise wasn’t actually kept)
Details of the 1802 plebiscite
o Meant to determine whether Napoleon could become Life Consulate – meaning consulship for life and then the right to nominate his successor (first step towards the reintroduction of the hereditary principle, but not there yet)
o Napoleon accepted the constitution ‘if the will of the people demands it’, suggesting that the plebiscite was really intended to reflect popular sovereignty
o 50.55% voted (more than last time so perhaps shows more enthusiasm) and the results were 99.76% for and 0.24% against
o But it is known that some local officials tampered with results, sending in a unanimous ‘yes’ vote to please their superiors in some cases
Changes to the constitution in 1802
o The numbers of the Senate are expanded because the body, in the words of Napoleon, was responsible for ‘everything not provided for by the constitution, and necessary to its working’
o Between January and March 1802, the Tribunate and Legislative Body were severely purged. He had 20 removed from the Tribunate, 60 from the Legislative Body, and the Tribunate was also split into three.
Details of the 1804 plebiscite
o According to his declaration, this move was made in response to the ‘pressure of public opinion’
o Meant to determine whether Napoleon could become Emperor (the title becomes formally hereditary)
o 47.2% voted and the results were 99.93% for and 0.07% against
o But following results from the previous 1802 plebiscite, where 40% of ‘no’ votes came from the army, the government simply didn’t poll the soldiers this time, and just added in half a million ‘yes’ votes on their behalf
Napoleon’s coronation
o Napoleon is consecrated as Emperor on 2nd December 1804 in the cathedral of Notre Dame
o He places the crown upon his own head, which is an insult to the Pope and causes their relations to deteriorate thereafter
o Napoleon, on his coronation, swears to respect and impose ‘the laws of equal rights, political and civil liberties’
o In May 1805, Napoleon crowns himself again but this time in Milan Cathedral, symbolising his rule as King of Italy too.
Further constitutional developments after 1804
- Following the establishment of Napoleon as Emperor in 1804, the Tribunate and Legislature were hardly consulted at all. In 1810 the Tribunate was finally abolished, and the Legislature had its last meeting in 1813 (it only met a few sessions per year by this point)
- Government was increasingly conducted by the Senate and Council of State, both of which were under Napoleon’s personal control.
- Whilst the Senate, in theory, gained important new powers in 1804 with the formation of two new standing committees, one concerned with preserving individual liberty and the other with safeguarding the freedom of the press, these committees in reality had very little influence. Napoleon didn’t give either committee any real opportunity to consider complaints, and only a handful of cases were dealt with over 10 years.
Details of Napoleon’s marital status
- Josephine was now past child-bearing age and Napoleon wanted an heir to the throne, so he divorced her, managing to convince very reluctant church to formalise this.
- In 1810, at the age of 40, he married 18-year-old Marie-Louise of Austria (Marie-Antoinette’s niece). This could perhaps be used as an example of both Napoleon and the French public no longer caring that much about sticking to revolutionary principles – what is more important by this point is creating a stable government, and an heir was required in order for this to happen
- Napoleon’s son, also called Napoleon, was born in 1811
How did Napoleon get rid of Jacobin threats?
o Some Jacobins were responsible for a failed ‘dagger conspiracy’ in 1800
o In 1801, 129 Jacobin leaders were arrested and deported
How did Napoleon get rid of Royalist threats?
o Napoleon continued to use military tribunals to deal with rebel leaders
o In Brittany, 6000 Chouan prisoners were taken and 750 shot in 1800
o In February/March 1804, Bonaparte’s spy network wrongly reported that the Bourdon prince, the duc d’Enghien, was involved in a royalist conspiracy against him. He was seized and shot by Napoleon’s agents, and thereafter there wasn’t much royalist disturbance.
How did Napoleon get rid of liberal threats?
o Napoleon was generally accepted by ‘moderates’, but some liberals criticised what they saw as an emerging dictatorship in Napoleon.
o An example of such a person was Madame de Stael, who was a respected writer and thinker on ideas of ‘liberal government’, supporting rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
o Her salon where her lover, Benjamin Constant, and his friends met formed the hub of the liberal resistance movement.
o Napoleon grew so irritated with this group that, in 1803, he banished Madame de Stael and Benjamin Constant to a distance of 64km from Paris.
How did the developments of the war help Napoleon consolidate his position?
o Success against Austrian forces at the battle of Marengo in 1800 provided the opportunity for military propaganda surrounding Napoleon’s heroism
o The 1802 Peace of Amiens with Britain offered some respite from constant war for the first time in ten years, and was popular with the bourgeoisie (whose interests were in trade and peacetime occupations)
Details of the Legion of Honour
o The Legion of Honour was introduced in May 1802, which was meritocratic in principle. Over the following 12 years he gave out 32,000 awards for skilled work and service to the Emperor.
o Recipients of the Legion of Honour received a distinctive decoration and a small annual award: 250 francs a year, rising to 5000 francs for grand officers
o However, these awards were disproportionately given out to current or former members of the nobility, with only 1,500 of the total 32,000 being given to ordinary civilians. And even in some cases, the awards were made hereditary.
Details of the princely titles Napoleon gave out
Napoleon also accompanied his 1804 coronation by giving out princely titles to his relatives: his brothers Joseph and Louis were given such titles in 1804
How was the Imperial Nobility meritocratic/in line with 1789 revolutionary principles?
o Napoleon founded the ‘Imperial Nobility’ in March 1808, which included counts, barons and knights. These titles could be awarded for a variety of things and to a variety of people, with the title of knight being most open to people from all sorts of backgrounds and awarded based on merit.
o The majority of titles went to military men (59%) and most of the rest to civil servants, showing how those who became ennobled were genuinely serving the country well.
o The Imperial Nobility was only a seventh of the size of the old nobility of 1789, meaning that it wasn’t as dominant and that titles weren’t just handed out undeservedly.
How was the Imperial Nobility biased/not meritocratic? What was its real aim?
o There was also quite a big overlap with the old class of aristocracy, with 22.5% of those ennobled by Napoleon having already been from the Ancien Regime nobility.
o Only 2% of those ennobled were not military men, senior state officials, or other notables. This shows how whilst people who received such titles may have worked hard, specific sectors of society were very obviously favoured over the others, with most of the lower and middle classes being excluded.
o Provision was also made for title to become hereditary when a recipient had a sufficiently large income. This is distinctly unmeritocratic.
o Therefore, the Imperial Nobility became a prop to the policy of ralliement, which meant consolidating power through winning over the local elites.
Details of the lycées… how meritocratic? how effective?
o Education law of May 1802 established 45 highly selective, militarised lycées for boys ages 10-16
o Secondary education was highly centralised, with government appointed teachers teaching to a common syllabus from identical textbooks – aimed to create a sense of national unity
o Secondary education included the study of classical subjects (eg literature, Greek and Latin)
o Students got places at lycées by an open scholarship examination, so they were meritocratic in nature
o However, whilst they were theoretically open to all, the lycées only provided 6,400 places in total, and reserved 2,400 of these for the sons of soldiers and civil servants (Napoleon’s ‘notables’). So arguably wasn’t that meritocratic as merely reinforced the existing social hierarchy with the sons of nobles and military men getting clear preference
What other forms of secondary school were there?
o Boys could also go to other forms of secondary schools (colleges and instituts) but fees were very high and students had to pay an additional levy which was put towards the lycees. (so still meritocratic as Napoleon favoured the lycees)
Details of the primary school system
o The education law of 1802 also established ecoles populaires (state primary schools) in each commune, run by local municipalities and inspected by sub-prefects – primary education was generally left to the Catholic church to organise though.
When was the Imperial Institute created? What was its overall role and how did Napoleon justify it?
o The imperial university was created in March 1808, and was supposed to act as a supervisory, rather than a teaching, institution, with its role being to ensure that all education conformed to certain standards.
o On justifying the Imperial University to the Council of State, Napoleon told them ‘we must secure unity’ – uniformity of education = control