New Growth Theory Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Issue with Solow model

A

Cannot account for cross-country income differences as capital’s share is small - everything is explained by A (tech) which is not sufficient

Hence introduced new growth theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Focus on 1st approach: R&D

Why are ideas different from other economic goods (2)

A

PUBLIC GOODS
Ideas are non-rivalrous (using an idea does not prevent others from using it too)

Ideas also only partially excludable (depending on tech and legal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What would we expect the cost of an idea to be

A

Fixed cost - since non-rival.

Either bought from independent R&D firm, or developed internally. Either way once acquired, use of ideas are costless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Suppose cost function C(q) = F + cq

q is quantity of product
F is fixed (research) cost (likely large)
c is constant MC

What would AC be

B) is AC><=MC

A

AC = F/Q + c

B) AC>MC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If producer of idea is a small perfect competitor.

How does it compete

B) draw diag

A

Price taker so P=MC

B) draw AC downward sloping, but recall AC>MC.

Also no production at this point, as making a loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

So no production of ideas with perfect competition.

What about monopolies

B) Draw diagr

C) what is a caveat to this

A

Yes

C) underproduce ideas compared to a social optimum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Problems with public production of ideas (2)

A

Financed by distortionary taxes - public dishappy

Public may also prefer private R&D and accept monopoly power, as long as they get innovation!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Issue of non-excludability

A

Non-excludability means private production will not occur (since cannot stop others from using ideas, thus no one produces! Free rider problem)

Hence why we need ideas to have some excludability e.g patent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Now model it:

2 sectors - goods sector and R&D sector

Fraction aL of labour in R&D, 1-aL in goods sector.
Both use knowledge/tech A

What is key difference from Solow model

A

Tech growth was exogenous in Solow, now is endogenised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is it tech growth now endogenised?

A

Production function for new ideas i.e more researches = more ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

So what is output equation Y (in goods sector)

B) what about the production function for new knowledge (A.)( (R&D sector)

Pg13

A

Y = A(1-aL)L

B)

A. = B[aLL] to the γ A to the ø

A is current ideas
A. - new ideas
aLL : number of people attempting to discover new ideas
Ø > 0 productivity of research increases with stock of ideas already discovered (since built upon ideas! Ideas are rarely completely new!!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What about R&D sector’s returns to scale to labour

A

Can be IRS CRS or DRS i.e γ>=<1

I.e increasing labour, can have knowledge transfer and IRS, or increasing labour could cause distractions working together! So decreasing returns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is K. (Change in capital stock) different to normal Solow

A

B) K. = sY (saving is a constant proportion of output)

(No δk in this as looking at human capital not physical)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Call growth rate of A gA.

What does output Y grow at

B) what does output per worker Y/L grow at

A

n + gA

B)
gA (since /L removes L from both sides which grows at rate n, so now just gA!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Growth in A gA expression (pg 17)

A

A. = B[aLL] to the γ A to the Ø
Divide by A
gA = A./A = B[aLL) to the γ A to the ø-1

Simple: we just divided by A. Basically the same except last term because
A to the ø / A = A to the ø-1 !!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Take logs of gA expression pg17

B) then differentiate with respect to time, why? Show 2 final expressions (g.A/gA and g.A)

A

LogGa = logBaL to the γ + ylogL + (ø-1)logA

Ba constant so do not separate

B) differentiate to get growth rates. Final eq:
g.A/gA = yn + (ø-1)gA
g.a = [γn + (ø-1)gA]gA

17
Q

Scenario 1: ø<1

When is there a stable equilibrium value of gA (expression)
Pg 19

B) draw diagram

C) on diagram, where is highest growth rate (turning point)

A

Rearrange to get stable value
g*A = yn/1-ø

B) Y axis g.A, X axis gA
When gA<gA, positive growth rate of knowledge
gA>gA
, negative/falling growth rate of knowledge.
Stable equilibrium value as left of g*a increases, while right of it moves back left.

C) ga = yn/2(1-ø) since its halfway of g*a!

18
Q

When Ø<1 , what can we say about aL

B) add it onto the diagram

A

aL is not in the ga equation!!!
aL does not effect the growth rate g
A - it has a level effect on A

(Just like how savings rate s only has level effect in Solow model, affects growth rate only temporarily)

B) draw arrow increasing ga but then arrows go backwards as only temporarily, then return to steady state.

19
Q

So when ø<1, an increase in aL does not affect the growth rate of tech.

What does it affect

B) diagram to show effect pg21

A

An increase in aL increases PERMANENT level of technology (A), but not the growth rate of it! (LEVEL EFFECT NOT GROWTH EFFECT)

B) lnA y axis,
Time x axis.

Draw dotted line as counterfactual, but then an increase in slope to show higher temporary growth rate. (This will fall back down overtime)

20
Q

Scenario 2: if ø>1

Is g.a still positive?

A

Using g.a = [yn - (ø-1)ga]ga

Since gA>0, g.A>0
Since growth rate is positive, growth rate is also increasing! (Unlike when ø<1 since growth rate could be negative beyond steady state g*A= yn/1-ø)

21
Q

So if positive growth rate (gA>0) and also increasing rate of growth g.A>0

What does this look like on diagram

A

Convex, curving upwards since ever increasing g.A>0!
So ever increasing growth rather than convergence!

Unlike when ø<1 where growth rate is positive and increasing, and then goes negative!

22
Q

We saw with ø<1 an increase in aL does not effect gA.

What about now when >1?

A

aL ↑⇒ gA ↑⇒ g ̇A ↑

So now it does have a permanent effect on growth rate!

23
Q

Scenario 3: ø=1

What do we get for gA and g.A

A

gA = B[aLL] to the γ

(A disappears since A¹-¹=0)

g.A = [yn - (1-1)ga]ga
=yngA

24
Q

So when ø=1, if n>0, and how does this look in diagram

B) what if n=0

A

gA grows overtime at rate yn (straight upward sloping)

B)
Growth rates of K,Y and Y/L all constant and positive equaling B[aLL] to the γ,
thus aL impacts long run growth rate (permanently rises it to a higher constant level)

25
So with ø<1: growth rate gA converges to yn/1-ø (an increase in aL cannot permanently raise steady state growth rate g*A). ø>1 , growth rate accelerates forever (g.A>0) (no steady state) (an increase in aL amplifies this acceleration) ø=1, if n=0, growth rate is constant at B[aLL]γ , and an increase in aL can increase permananet growth level e.g 2% to 3% (with no further acceleration) And if n>0, increasing growth rate (at rate yn), (aL amplifies the acceleration - hence why it says dynamics similar to ø>1)
26
So as mentioned, perfect comp makes loss so doesnt supply ideas. Private production requires excludability to create a monopoly, which still underproduces. Issues with public production too (distortionary taxes + households may be okay with monopoly as long as get innovation) So optimal amount of R&D is generally not attained. 3 distortions to research
Knowledge spillovers = researchers are not compensated for contributions towards improving productivity of future researchers (no reward for ø>1!), thus underproduce research Stepping on toes - research productivity lowered by duplication of ideas Consumer surplus effect - monopoly does not achieve full CS compared to perfect competition, monopoly profits
27
These distortions matter IRL, i.e benefit to society (CS) is so large for stuff like research into cures for malaria, that gov funds research in unis etc. What else should they do
Subsidise R&D